On the Archaeology of “Dispositif Spatial ” from the debate of Foucault and Derrida on "Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique"

法國思想家德希達於1963年的哲學會議上，發表〈我思與瘋狂史〉評論傅柯在1961年出版的《古典時代瘋狂史》。德希達認為，傅柯在《古典時代瘋狂史》中以考古學的方式探尋非理性起源史、理性/瘋狂的界限史，本質上仍屬於某種歷史主義、某種編年史的考究，並且認為在經驗歷史的層次談論理性與瘋狂的界限猶如隔靴搔癢，無法進入此議題的本質。藉著《古典時代瘋狂史》的論調，德希達建構了另一種理性/瘋狂的界限論述，依此說明，理性與瘋狂的界限（理性/瘋狂），是伴隨著思想活動的每個當下而發生，故僅有在思想活動的層次才能形構出理性/瘋狂中間的分隔號、界限、起源。 本文在第一章概述這場爭論的背景：法國60年代的思想史脈絡。第二章進入傅柯「理性/瘋狂」的界限思考，並闡析德希達在〈我思與瘋狂史〉中對此論調的批評。第三章正式進入傅柯，筆者認為德希達誤解傅柯，一方面是傅柯在書寫《古典時代瘋狂史》時，考古學方法論尚未成熟，故交代不清；另一方面是德希達刻意將傅柯劃入起源的形上學，並藉此解構傳統在場的形上學。釐清傅柯對「理性/瘋狂」之起源概念的關鍵在於傅柯思想的基底材料：考古學意義下的話語事件。筆者將在此章節會清楚地交代。第四章闡釋考古學到系譜學的發展動態，並把焦點定在傅柯思想的核心概念：「配置」，筆者認為，配置是傅柯思想的基礎形式，透過配置，我們更能清楚地看到傅柯心目中的「起源/決斷」之意義（話語事件）；另一方面筆者依此概念疏理傅柯在1970後的思想轉型，於此我們涉及了傅柯的權力分析學，並解釋系譜學意義的話語事件。最後，在第五章，筆者藉由配置與話語事件的關係說明傅柯的空間性思維，藉此標誌出特屬於傅柯思想的特異性：異托邦：配置的是異托邦概念的實際操作，配置就是「異質拓樸學」。In 1963, French philosopher Derrida had commented on Foucault’s (Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique) in his conference paper . The archaeology method that Foucault applied to discuss the origin of non-reason and the limit of reason/madness, Derrida believed, is basically just a kind of historicism and chronicle study and it is far from enough to inquire the limit of reason/madness merely out of history of experience. Thus, Derrida constructed a different way to expound the limit of reason/madness, in order to declare that the relation of reason and madness is accompany with every moment of our thinking activity, and we can only construct the limit of reason/madness in the level of thinking activity. The first chapter of this dissertation, is the context of French intellectual history in 1960s, as the background of this debate. In the second chapter, I go through Foucault’s thought on the limit of “Reason/Madness”, and Derrida’s critic of it in. By the third chapter, I step from Foucault’s thoughts and claim that in this debate Derrida’s critic is actually out of his misunderstanding of Foucault. On the one side, since the Archaeology as a methodology is not mature when Foucault was written the , that turns out Foucault cannot declare the concept of Archaeology clearly; on the other side, Derrida sedulously put Foucault’s thought into the metaphysics of origin, and used it to deconstruct traditional metaphysics of presence. In order to clarify the origin of “Reason/Madness” ’s concept, the crucial point is to understand the basic material of Foucault’s thought: Discursive event in the framework of archaeology, which I mention in the third chapter. In the forth chapter, I discuss the development from archaeology to genealogy, and focus on the core concept “ Dispositif ” (Dispositive) in Foucault’s philosophy. I believe that Dispositif is the fundamental form of Foucault’s thought, and via Dispositif, we can getting more close to the meaning of “Origin/Decision” in Foucault’s mind; At the same time, I use this concept to sort out how Foucault’s thought changed after 1970. I mention Foucault ‘s analysis of power and explain how he deployed discursive event’s meaning in the genealogy. At last, in the fifth chapter, I explain Foucault’s spatial thought from the relationship between Dispositif and discursive event, from it I can point out the singularity of his thought: Hétérotopie，as Dispoistif is the actual usage of the Hétérotopie concept, Dispositif is Hétérotopologie

信息不透明、分析师关注与个股暴跌风险

本文以我国A股公司为研究样本,考察了公司信息透明度与个股暴跌风险之间的内在关系,以及证券分析师关注程度对这种关系的影响。研究结果显示,上市公司的信息透明度越低,其个股发生暴跌的风险越大。进一步的研究发现,旨在加强信息披露监管的新法规的出台,并没有显著减弱信息不透明的负面影响。在我国投资者法律保护环境尚不理想的情况下,证券分析师作为一种有效的法律外替代机制,其对股票的关注大大降低了信息不透明对个股暴跌风险的影响。本研究不仅有助于理解我国股市个股暴跌频繁背后的深层次原因,同时也为监管部门思考如何进行符合中国国情的市场透明度建设提供决策参考

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine versus Premixed Insulin in Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes:A Meta-analysis

目的:系统评价甘精胰岛素对比预混胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病的疗效与安全性,以为临床提供循证参考。方法:计算机检索Pub Med、中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据库和中文科技期刊数据库,收集甘精胰岛素(试验组)对比预混胰岛素(对照组)治疗2型糖尿病疗效与安全性的随机对照试验(RCT),对符合纳入标准的临床研究进行资料提取,并采用改良后的Jadad量表进行质量评价,采用Rev Man 5.0统计软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入10项RCT,合计1 655例患者。Meta分析结果显示,甘精胰岛素在降低糖化血红蛋白水平[MD=-0.41,95%CI(-0.64,-0.18),P<0.001]、空腹血糖水平[MD=-0.51,95%CI(-0.99,-0.02),P=0.04]方面均优于预混胰岛素,两组比较差异均有统计学意义,而在降低餐后2 h血糖水平[MD=-0.56,95%CI(-1.21,0.09),P=0.09]、体质量指数[MD=-0.52,95%CI(-1.52,0.48),P=0.31]方面,差异均无统计学意义;甘精胰岛素组患者的低血糖发生率[RR=0.65,95%CI(0.46,0.90),P=0.01]低于预混胰岛素组,差异有统计学意义。结论:甘精胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病的疗效与安全性优于预混胰岛素。OBJECTIVE:To systematically review the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine versus premixed insulin in treatment of type 2 diabetes,and provide evidence-based reference for clinical treatment. METHODS:Retrieved from Pub Med,CJFD,Wanfang Database and VIP Database,the randomized controlled trials(RCT)about the efficacy and safety of premixed insulin versus insulin glargine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes were collected. Meta-analysis was performed by using Rev Man 5.0 statistics software after extracting data and evaluating quality by modified Jadad. RESULTS:A total of 10 RCTs were enrolled,involving 1 655 patients. Results of Meta-analysis showed that insulin glargine was better than premixed insulin on reducing glycated hemoglobin[M=-0.41,95% CI(-0.64,-0.18),P<0.001] and fasting blood glucose [MD=-0.51,95% CI(-0.99,-0.02),P=0.04],there were significantly differences between 2 groups,and there were no significantly differences in reducing 2 h postprandial blood glucose [MD=-0.56,95% CI(-1.21,0.09),P=0.09] and body mass index [MD=-0.52,95% CI(-1.52,0.48),P=0.31];the incidence of hypoglycemia in insulin glargine group was significantly lower than premixed insulin,there were significantly differences between 2 groups [RR=0.65,95%CI(0.46,0.90),P=0.01]. CONCLUSIONS:The efficacy and safety of insulin glargine are better than premixed insulin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Measurement of integrated luminosity of data collected at 3.773 GeV by BESIII from 2021 to 2024

We present a measurement of the integrated luminosity e+e- of collision data collected by the BESIII detector at the BEPCII collider at a center-of-mass energy of Ecm = 3.773 GeV. The integrated luminosities of the datasets taken from December 2021 to June 2022, from November 2022 to June 2023, and from October 2023 to February 2024 were determined to be 4.995±0.019 fb-1, 8.157±0.031 fb-1, and 4.191±0.016 fb-1, respectively, by analyzing large angle Bhabha scattering events. The uncertainties are dominated by systematic effects, and the statistical uncertainties are negligible. Our results provide essential input for future analyses and precision measurements

Determination of the number of ψ(3686) events taken at BESIII

The number of ψ(3686) events collected by the BESIII detector during the 2021 run period is determined to be (2259.3±11.1)×106 by counting inclusive ψ(3686) hadronic events. The uncertainty is systematic and the statistical uncertainty is negligible. Meanwhile, the numbers of ψ(3686) events collected during the 2009 and 2012 run periods are updated to be (107.7±0.6)×106 and (345.4±2.6)×106, respectively. Both numbers are consistent with the previous measurements within one standard deviation. The total number of ψ(3686) events in the three data samples is (2712.4±14.3)×10^