33 research outputs found
그리드 컴퓨팅 시장의 경제 모형 구축 및 사회적 효율성 최적화에 관한 시뮬레이션 연구
학위논문(석사)--서울대학교 대학원 :협동과정 기술정책전공,2004.Maste
주파수 가중 그래미언을 이용한 상태 가중 모델 축소 기법과 마이크로 관성 센서에의 적용
Thesis (doctoral)--서울대학교 대학원 :전기·컴퓨터공학부,2002.Docto
Effect of sildenafil added to antifibrotic treatment in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Sildenafil is a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor used to treat idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension; however, its benefits are unclear in patients with advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We aimed to evaluate its effect as an add-on to antifibrotic agents on clinical outcomes of real-world IPF patients. Among a total of 607 IPF patients treated with antifibrotic agent, 66 concurrently received sildenafil. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences in age, sex, body mass index, forced vital capacity (FVC), and diffusing capacity (DLCO) between the sildenafil and no-sildenafil groups. The outcomes of these groups in terms of FVC decline rate, all-cause mortality, hospitalization, and acute exacerbation were compared. Propensity score matching identified 51 matched pairs. The mean age of the patients was 69.5 years and 80.4% were male. Mean FVC and DLCO were 51.7% and 29.5% of the predicted values, respectively. The FVC decline rates did not differ significantly (p = 0.714) between the sildenafil (- 101 mL/year) and no-sildenafil (- 117 mL/year) groups. In multivariable analyses adjusted for comorbidities and presence of pulmonary hypertension, sildenafil had no significant impact on all-cause mortality, hospitalization, or acute exacerbation. Sildenafil add-on to antifibrotic treatment had no significant effects on the clinical outcomes of IPF patients
Antifibrotic treatment improves clinical outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a propensity score matching analysis.
Long-term clinical course and outcome of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features
Impact of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis on clinical outcomes of lung cancer patients
The clinical characteristics of lung cancer in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) differ from those of lung cancer in patients without IPF. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the impact of IPF on the clinical course of patients with lung cancer. Clinical data of IPF patients with lung cancer (n=122) were compared with those of patients with lung cancer without IPF (n=488) matched by age, sex, histopathology, stage, and date of diagnosis of lung cancer. The median follow-up period after diagnosis of lung cancer was 16 months. Among patients with IPF, the mean age was 68 years, 95.9% were male, 93.2% were ever-smokers, and squamous cell carcinoma was the most common cancer type (48.4%). The IPF group had poorer lung function and lower lobe predominance of lung cancer than the no-IPF group. The IPF group showed a poorer prognosis than the no-IPF group (5-year survival rate: 14.5% vs. 30.1%, respectively; P<0.001), even after adjusting for lung function and regardless of the treatment method. Among patients with IPF, 16.8% experienced acute exacerbation within 1 month after treatment of lung cancer. The treatment outcome of patients with lung cancer and IPF was generally unfavorable, and acute exacerbation triggered by treatment frequently occurred
Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: Where Are We Now?
Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a diverse collection of lung disorders sharing similar features, such as inflammation and fibrosis. The diagnosis and management of ILD require a multidisciplinary approach using clinical, radiological, and pathological evaluation. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) is a distinct form of progressive and fibrotic disease, occurring in ILD cases other than in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). It is defined based on clinical symptoms, lung function, and chest imaging, regardless of the underlying condition. The progression to PPF must be monitored through a combination of pulmonary function tests (forced vital capacity [FVC] and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide), an assessment of symptoms, and computed tomography scans, with regular follow-up. Although the precise mechanisms of PPF remain unclear, there is evidence of shared pathogenetic mechanisms with IPF, contributing to similar disease behavior and worse prognosis compared to non-PPF ILD. Pharmacological treatment of PPF includes immunomodulatory agents to reduce inflammation and the use of antifibrotics to target progressive fibrosis. Nintedanib, a known antifibrotic agent, was found to be effective in slowing IPF progression and reducing the annual rate of decline in FVC among patients with PPF compared to placebos. Nonpharmacological treatment, including pulmonary rehabilitation, supplemental oxygen therapy, and vaccination, also play important roles in the management of PPF, leading to comprehensive care for patients with ILD. Although there is currently no cure for PPF, there are treatments that can help slow the progression of the disease and improve quality of life
