Simvastatin-induced cytotoxicity and chemosensitivity in the drug-resistant bladder cancer cell lines

학위논문(박사) --서울대학교 대학원 :의학과(비뇨기과학 전공),2009.2.Docto

FADD 유전자 발현에 의한 신세포암 세포고사

학위논문(석사)--서울대학교 대학원 :의학과 비뇨기과학전공,2003.Maste

Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) was introduced in 2012 and updated to version 2.1 (v2.1) in early 2019 to improve diagnostic performance and interreader reliability. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2.1 in comparison with v2. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2.1 for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Study Type Systematic review and meta-analysis. Subject One thousand two hundred forty-eight patients with 1406 lesions from 10 eligible articles. Field Strength/sequence Conventional MR sequences at 1.5 T and 3 T. Assessment Two reviewers independently identified and reviewed the original articles reporting diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2.1. Statistical Tests Meta-analytic summary sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random effects model. Meta-analytic sensitivity and specificity between PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 were compared. Results The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PI-RADS v2.1 were 87% (95% confidence intervals, 82-91%) and 74% (63-82%), respectively. In five studies available for a head-to-head comparison between PI-RADS v2.1 and v2, there were no significant differences in either sensitivity (90% [86-94%] vs. 88% [83-93%], respectively) or specificity (76% [59-93%] vs. 61% [39-83%], respectively; P = 0.37). The sensitivity and specificity were 81% (73-87%) and 82% (68-91%), respectively, for a PI-RADS score cutoff of >= 4, and 94% (88-97%) and 56% (35-97%) for >= 3. Regarding the zonal location, the sensitivity and specificity for the transitional zone only were 90% (84-96%) and 76% (62-90%) respectively, whereas for the whole gland they were 85% (79-91%) and 71% (57-85%). Data Conclusion PI-RADS v2.1 demonstrated good overall performance for the diagnosis of csPCa. PI-RADS v2.1 tended to show higher specificity than v2, but the difference lacked statistical significance. Level of Evidence 3 Technical Efficacy Stage

Adjuvant Low-dose Statin Use after Radical Prostatectomy: The PRO-STAT Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Statin use is reportedly associated with the risk of prostate cancer, outcomes after treatment, and prostate cancer-specific mortality. We sought to determine the efficacy of adjuvant atorvastatin in prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned patients with pathologic high-risk prostate cancer to receive either low-dose atorvastatin (20 mg/day, n = 183) or placebo (n = 181) for 1 year after radical prostatectomy. The primary endpoint was the 1-year biochemical recurrence rate. The secondary endpoints included the 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival and changes in lipid, testosterone, and sex hormone binding globulin levels. RESULTS: From October 2012 through January 2019, a total of 364 patients underwent randomization. Among 59 total primary end points, 30 (16.4%) and 29 (16.0%) occurred in the atorvastatin and placebo groups, respectively. Atorvastatin did not significantly reduce the primary endpoint of 1-year biochemical recurrence [HR, 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-1.60]. During a median follow-up of 24 months, 131 patients experienced biochemical recurrence (68 in the atorvastatin group and 63 in the placebo group), representing Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates of 24.0% and 25.4% in the atorvastatin and placebo groups, respectively, at 24 months (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.71-1.41). We observed no significant between-group differences in the testosterone and sex hormone binding globulin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with high-risk pathologic features after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, 1-year adjuvant use of atorvastatin was not associated with a lower risk of disease recurrence compared with that for placebo. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01759836).See related commentary by Murtola and Siltari, p. 4947

Noninvasive Precision Screening of Prostate Cancer by Urinary Multimarker Sensor and Artificial Intelligence Analysis

Screening for prostate cancer relies on the serum prostate-specific antigen test, which provides a high rate of false positives (80%). This results in a large number of unnecessary biopsies and subsequent overtreatment. Considering the frequency of the test, there is a critical unmet need of precision screening for prostate cancer. Here, we introduced a urinary multimarker biosensor with a capacity to learn to achieve this goal. The correlation of clinical state with the sensing signals from urinary multimarkers was analyzed by two common machine learning algorithms. As the number of biomarkers was increased, both algorithms provided a monotonic increase in screening performance. Under the best combination of biomarkers, the machine learning algorithms screened prostate cancer patients with more than 99% accuracy using 76 urine specimens. Urinary multimarker biosensor leveraged by machine learning analysis can be an important strategy of precision screening for cancers using a drop of bodily fluid

Value of clinical parameters and MRI with PI-RADSV2 in predicting seminal vesicle invasion of prostate cancer

Objective: To investigate the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RAD