The Dandelion Program: 2016 in Review

[Excerpt] The Dandelion Program is an initiative to build valuable Information Technology, life, and executive functional skills to help establish careers for people on the autism spectrum. The implementation and assessment of Dandelion pods concentrates on identifying and supporting individuals on the autism spectrum with the potential to excel in testing, data science, and cyber security roles. Over the course of 2016, the program continued to grow at a rapid rate, and achieved a large number of significant milestones. This report will cover some of the most significant developments over the course of the last year

Examples of DXC Dandelion Program Trainee Talent and Value

Over the last five years, the Dandelion Program initiated independent research studies to review the performance and benefits of the program, across all our teams

DXC Dandelion Program: 2017 in Review

[Excerpt] The Dandelion Program is an initiative to build valuable Information Technology, life, and executive functioning skills to help establish careers for people on the autism spectrum. The implementation and assessment of Dandelion pods (or ‘groups’) concentrates on identifying and supporting individuals on the autism spectrum with potential to excel in testing, data science, and cyber security roles. The Dandelion Program grew rapidly in 2017, and this report will cover its most significant developments throughout the year

Library Technology Conference 2015 Print Schedule

PDF of the complete program from the 2015 Library Technology Conference

Cellulosic Ethanol Technology Assessment

Resource /Energy Economics and Policy,

EDITORIAL.TECHNOLOGY AS A SUPPORT TO TRADITIONAL ASSESSMENT PRACTICES

Assessment in education is under pressure to change. Some drivers for change result from new ways of thinking about assessment and its educational purposes. Other drivers are external and are the result of wider changes in society. Technology falls into this second category. This special issue is concerned with change at the intersection of assessment and technology in education

Digital Ink Technology for e-assessment

Current research has shown that lecturers marking electronic assignments, typically Word documents, are able to provide personalised feedback at a relevant point in a student’s piece of assessment using paper technology such as a Tablet PC. Evaluation through in-depth interview and questionnaire shows that this was important to both students and lecturers alike. Some lecturers have felt that the Tablet PC allows greater creativity in assessment than technologies such as paper and pen and PC and keyboard input device. For example the use of colour linked to learning outcomes and grammar feedback, and the ease with which the eraser can be used for re-editing. It appears that the pedagogy has been extended from the traditional ‘pen and paper’ approach to the use of ‘digital ink technology’. Students said that they liked the personal feel of the electronic hand written feedback. Reflective practice for lecturers was supported through forums and a wiki and was evaluated using virtual ethnography. Lecturers record a flow experience in assessment as either enabling or disabling their creativity in e-assessment. The potential for extending the pedagogy into graphical environments is also evident for such things as annotating graphs and diagrams, mathematical notation and scientific nomenclature

Dandelion Program Generic Project Management Plan

[Excerpt] There are significant benefits to clients in establishing an arrangement with Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)/ Specialist People to access and acquire critical, skilled ICT resources by harnessing the talents and developing the skills of a capable, diverse segment of the workforce

Technology assessment between risk, uncertainty and ignorance

The use of most if not all technologies is accompanied by negative side effects, While we may profit from today’s technologies, it is most often future generations who bear most risks. Risk analysis therefore becomes a delicate issue, because future risks often cannot be assigned a meaningful occurance probability. This paper argues that technology assessement most often deal with uncertainty and ignorance rather than risk when we include future generations into our ethical, political or juridal thinking. This has serious implications as probabilistic decision approaches are not applicable anymore. I contend that a virtue ethical approach in which dianoetic virtues play a central role may supplement a welfare based ethics in order to overcome the difficulties in dealing with uncertainty and ignorance in technology assessement