70 research outputs found
One-neutron halo structure in C-15
The one- or two-neutron removal reactions as well as reaction cross sections for C-14,C-15 on carbon target have been studied by using 110A MeV Ne-22 primary beam on Riken Projectile Fragment Separator in RIKEN. The longitudinal momentum distributions of C-13,C-14 fragments from C-15 and C-13 fragments from C-14 breakup have been measured at 83A MeV by means of direct time-of-flight method. Full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the distributions have been determined to be 71+/-9 MeV/c and 223+/-28 MeV/c for C-14 and C-13 from C-15, and 195+/-21 MeV/c for C-13 from C-14. The FWHM for C-13 fragments from C-15 and C-14 breakup are consistent with the Goldhaber model's prediction. While the FWHM of C-14 fragments from C-15 is much smaller, which confirms the experimental results from MSU and GANIL, an anomalous enhancement from its neighbors has been observed in the measured reaction cross section of C-15. The experimental data are discussed in the framework of the Glauber model. The analysis of both the fragment momentum distributions and reaction cross sections indicates a dominant s-wave component in the ground state of C-15.Copyright notice(c)2004 American Physical Society. All rights reserved.
Publisher's version: http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRC/v69/i3/e034613textapplication/pdfjournal articl
Measurement of branching fraction and time-dependent CP asymmetry parameters in B^0 → D^*+D^*-K^{0}_{S}decays
We present a measurement of the branching fraction and time-dependent CP violation parameters for B^0 → D^*+D^*-K^{0}_{S} decays. These results are obtained from a 414 fb^{-1} data sample that contains 449×10^6 B\bar{B} pairs collected at the Υ(4S) resonance with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energy e^+e^- collider. We obtain the branching fraction, B(B^0→D^*+D*^-K^{O}_{S})= [3.4±0.4(stat)±0.7(syst)]×10^-3, which is in agreement with the current world average. We also obtain an upper limit on the product branching fraction for a possible two-body decay, B(B^0 → D_s1^+(2536)D^*-)B(D_s1^+(2536)→ D^*+K^{O}_{S})s^+, where s^±[equivalent]m2(D^*±K^{0}_{S}), we extract the CP violation parameters, J_c/J_0=0.60^{+0.25}_{-0.28}(stat)±0.08(syst), 2J_s1/J_0sin2φ_1=-0.17^{+0.42}_{-0.42}(stat)±0.09(syst), 2J_s2/J_0cos2φ_1=-0.23^{+0.43}_{-0.41}(stat)±0.13(syst). A large value of J_c/J_0 would indicate a significant resonant contribution from a broad unknown D_s^**+ state. Although the sign of the factor, 2J_s2/J_0, can be deduced from theory, no conclusion can be drawn regarding the sign of cos2φ_1 given the errors.journal articl
Precision for WGBS libraries with reads length of 120 bp.
<p>Table reports precision varying the sequencing error from 0% to 6% for 250 thousands of 120 bp reads mapped against the build 37.3 of the human genome.</p
Tool settings used to map synthetic reads.
<p>Tool settings used to map reads of synthetic libraries. Default settings have been used for not specified parameters.</p><p>Ungapped alignments. In these experiments Bismark and BS-Seeker2 are used with Bowtie.</p><p>Gapped alignments. In these experiments Bismark and BS-Seeker2 are used with Bowtie2.</p><p>Gapped local alignments. In these experiments BS-Seeker2 is used with Bowtie2.</p
Performance evaluation on WGBS data.
<p>Performances comparison on real-life libraries among GPU-BSM, Bismark, BSMAP, BS-Seeker2, and segemehl. Two directional libraries are analyzed: <i>SRR019597</i>, which consists of 5.943.586 reads of length 76 bp, and <i>SRR019048</i>, which consists of 15.331.851 reads of length 87 bp. The first and second column of the table report the library and the name of the tools, respectively. The third column reports the time required to analyze the libraries. Columns 4 to 9 report the percentage of uniquely mapped reads according to the number of mapping differences. Differences are mismatches when the tools are used to look for ungapped alignments, whereas they may be mismatches and/or indels when the tools are used to look for gapped alignments. Computing time for GPU-BSM has been reported running it on a single and on two GPUs. As for multi-threading based tools, computing time has been reported for 12 cores. Tools settings: <i>i</i>) GPU-BSM -m 5 –ungapped -l 1, GPU-BSM -m 5 –e2e -l 1, GPU-BSM -m 5 -l 1; moreover for all experiments with GPU-BSM the following settings have been used: -L 76 for SRR019597 and -L 87 for SRR019048, -g 0 to run the experiment on a single GPU (-g 0 -g 1 to run the experiment on two GPUs); <i>ii</i>) Bismark -q ––directional, Bismark -q –directional –bowtie2 -p 6; <i>iii</i>) BSMAP -v 5 -w 2 -r 0 -p 12; <i>iv</i>) BS-Seeker2 -m 5 –aligner = bowtie -f sam, BS-Seeker2 -m 5 –aligner = bowtie2 -f sam –bt2–end-to-end –bt2-p 6, BS-Seeker2 -m 5 –aligner = bowtie2 -f sam –bt2-p 6<i>v</i>) segemehl -F 1 -H 1 -D 0 -A 70 –threads 12.</p><p>GPU-BSM run on a single GPU.</p><p>GPU-BSM run on two GPUs.</p><p>Bismark and BS-Seeker2 run in parallel two instances of Bowtie2. To ensure that both tools use 12 core we used the option -p 6/–bt2-p 6 so that each Bowtie2 instance runs with 6 threads.</p
F1 measure analyzing WGBS libraries with reads length of 75 bp.
<p>This figure reports F1 measure varying sequencing error from 0% to 6% for 250 thousands of 75 bp reads mapped against the build 37.3 of the human genome.</p
SNPLims: a data management system for genome wide association studies-3
Istogram of Call Rates; b) Histogram of GenCall Scores per sample; c) Histogram of GenCall Scores per SNPs; d) Histogram of Frequency of Minor Allele (MAF); e) Histogram of Hardy Weinberg P values (HWE) of control individuals.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "SNPLims: a data management system for genome wide association studies"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/9/S2/S13</p><p>BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9(Suppl 2):S13-S13.</p><p>Published online 26 Mar 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2323662.</p><p></p
SNPLims: a data management system for genome wide association studies-0
Istogram of Call Rates; b) Histogram of GenCall Scores per sample; c) Histogram of GenCall Scores per SNPs; d) Histogram of Frequency of Minor Allele (MAF); e) Histogram of Hardy Weinberg P values (HWE) of control individuals.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "SNPLims: a data management system for genome wide association studies"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/9/S2/S13</p><p>BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9(Suppl 2):S13-S13.</p><p>Published online 26 Mar 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2323662.</p><p></p
- …
