飛鳥井雅経『鳥羽百首』「五月雨」「月」「紅葉」「雪」歌注釈

『鳥羽百首』は飛鳥井雅経の家集『明日香井集』の最初に配されている。建久九年（一一九八）に詠作が開始されたことが知られ、詠作時期が判明する雅経歌の最初の作品である。本稿では、『鳥羽百首』の「五月雨」九首、「月」九首、「紅葉」九首、「雪」一〇首の計三七首について、校異、他文献、現代語訳、本歌、参考歌、語釈、補説をまとめたものである。textapplication/pdfdepartmental bulletin pape

Observation of the Radiative Decay D0→φγ

journal articl

AN ITERATED LOGARITHM RESULT FOR PARTIAL SUMS OF A STATIONARY LINEAR PROCESS

application/pdfdepartmental bulletin pape

Demonstration of the effects of decreased size at metamorphosis on amphibians

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Pesticide Mixtures, Endocrine Disruption, and Amphibian Declines: Are We Underestimating the Impact?"</p><p></p><p>Environmental Health Perspectives 2006;114(S-1):40-50.</p><p>Published online 24 Jan 2006</p><p>PMCID:PMC1874187.</p><p>This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original DOI</p> () Newly metamorphosed leopard frog () attempting to ingest a cricket that is too large (frog is 3.3 cm SVL; cricket is 2.1 cm long). () A 67-cm-long garter snake () feeding on a newly metamorphosed 3.2-cm-long leopard frog (). Frogs are gape-limited predators and less likely to find appropriate food when size at metamorphosis is reduced by pesticides. Similarly, garter snakes (like all snakes) are gape-limited predators, so smaller frogs are more vulnerable to snake predation

Pesticide Mixtures, Endocrine Disruption, and Amphibian Declines: Are We Underestimating the Impact?-1

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Pesticide Mixtures, Endocrine Disruption, and Amphibian Declines: Are We Underestimating the Impact?"</p><p></p><p>Environmental Health Perspectives 2006;114(S-1):40-50.</p><p>Published online 24 Jan 2006</p><p>PMCID:PMC1874187.</p><p>This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original DOI</p

Dorsal (,) and frontal (,) view of newly metamorphosed (Gosner stage 46) control (,) and similar-aged animal exposed to the nine-pesticide mixture (,)

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Pesticide Mixtures, Endocrine Disruption, and Amphibian Declines: Are We Underestimating the Impact?"</p><p></p><p>Environmental Health Perspectives 2006;114(S-1):40-50.</p><p>Published online 24 Jan 2006</p><p>PMCID:PMC1874187.</p><p>This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original DOI</p> Control animal is in good body condition as expected. The pesticide-treated animal is in poor body condition because of a generalized gram-negative bacterial infection. The pathogen was identified in control and treated frogs, but only pesticide-exposed animals show signs of disease: head tilt, unilateral extensor muscle rigidity, anisocoria, and intermittent recumbency due to a severe otitis interna and meningitis. This presentation is consistent with infection, a stress-induced disease of frogs

Pesticide Mixtures, Endocrine Disruption, and Amphibian Declines: Are We Underestimating the Impact?-0

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Pesticide Mixtures, Endocrine Disruption, and Amphibian Declines: Are We Underestimating the Impact?"</p><p></p><p>Environmental Health Perspectives 2006;114(S-1):40-50.</p><p>Published online 24 Jan 2006</p><p>PMCID:PMC1874187.</p><p>This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original DOI</p

Histological transverse cross-section (8 μm) of presumptive male () and female () leopard frog () at metamorphosis (Gosner stage 46)

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Pesticide Mixtures, Endocrine Disruption, and Amphibian Declines: Are We Underestimating the Impact?"</p><p></p><p>Environmental Health Perspectives 2006;114(S-1):40-50.</p><p>Published online 24 Jan 2006</p><p>PMCID:PMC1874187.</p><p>This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original DOI</p> Gonads are not completely differentiated. Note the intact cortex (C) and medulla (M) separated by blue connective tissue (arrows in ). Also note medullary regression and ovarian vesicle (OV) but absence of significant oogenesis in the female (). A single oocyte (arrow) is noted in the female. Scale bar = 125 μm

Representative transverse cross-section through the thymus of a control animal () and () an animal treated with the nine-compound pesticide mixture

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Pesticide Mixtures, Endocrine Disruption, and Amphibian Declines: Are We Underestimating the Impact?"</p><p></p><p>Environmental Health Perspectives 2006;114(S-1):40-50.</p><p>Published online 24 Jan 2006</p><p>PMCID:PMC1874187.</p><p>This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original DOI</p> () The frequency of animals with detectable damage to the thymus. No control animals showed damage to the thymus. Animals exposed to 0.1 ppb atrazine or to -metolachlor (-met) had damage as shown in , with increasing frequencies of damage with exposure to Bicep II Magnum (atrazine + metolachlor, given to concentration of 0.1 ppb atrazine), and maximum damage with exposure to the pesticide mixture (Mix). Histological sections were 4 μm stained in Mallory’s trichrome stain. Scale bar = 0.5 mm for and

Pesticide Mixtures, Endocrine Disruption, and Amphibian Declines: Are We Underestimating the Impact?-9

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Pesticide Mixtures, Endocrine Disruption, and Amphibian Declines: Are We Underestimating the Impact?"</p><p></p><p>Environmental Health Perspectives 2006;114(S-1):40-50.</p><p>Published online 24 Jan 2006</p><p>PMCID:PMC1874187.</p><p>This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original DOI</p