9 research outputs found
近世民衆教化にみる明清道徳律の土着化 : 『六諭衍義大意』の「翻訳」と活用について
本稿では、明清王朝で頒布された道徳倫理に関する勅諭「六諭」の近世日本における受容と伝播過程を分析し、明清の道徳律がどのような解釈・再生産過程を経て、近世日本の民衆世界に吸収されたかを考察する。まず、「六諭」及びそれを敷衍した教訓書『六諭衍義』の伝来と、近世日本の知識人によって和訳された『六諭衍義大意』の成立について簡単に紹介し、近世日本の民衆教化における「六諭」関係書の位置付けを明らかにする。次に、広島藩が頒布した一冊の『六諭衍義大意』の解説書『教訓道しるべ』を取り上げる。両書の違いを分析することで、「六諭」の受容過程における再解釈を解明する。そして代官早川正紀の教化活動における「六諭」関係書の活用について、『六教解』という『教訓道しるべ』を改題した書物を紹介する。『六教解』=『教訓道しるべ』は、当地の代官によって、様々な場面で民衆教化に用いられた。最後に、諸地域における『六諭衍義大意』『教訓道しるべ』『六教解』の活用状況を総覧し、近世日本における「六諭」の受容過程を明らかにする。textapplication/pdfdepartmental bulletin pape
MARCINKIEWICZ INTEGRALS WITH ROUGH KERNELS ON PRODUCT SPACES
application/pdfSuppose that $¥Omega(x^{¥prime}, y^{¥prime})¥in L^{1}(S^{n-1}¥times S^{m-1})$ is ahomogeneous function of degree zero $satis¥Phi ing$ the mean zero propeIty (1.1), and that $h(s,t)$ ls a bounded function on $Rx$ R. The Marcinkiewicz integral operator $m(f)$ along a continuous surface $¥gamma(u, v)$ on the product space $R^{n}xR^{m}(n¥geq 2, m¥geq 2)$ is defined by $¥iota_{O}f(¥xi, ¥eta, z)=(¥int_{R}¥int_{R}|F_{l,¥epsilon}(x, y, z)|^{2}2^{-2t-2¥epsilon}dtds)^{1/2}$ where $F_{t,e}(¥xi, ¥eta, z)$ $=¥int_{|_{¥nu}^{x}|^{:}}1$ and that two lower dimensional maximal functions related to $¥gamma$ are bounded on $L^{p}$ . These two lower dimensional maximal functions are natural extension of a well-known maximal function along curves.departmental bulletin pape
The Activation of Tertiary Carboxamides in Metal Complexes: An Experimental and Theoretical Study on the Methanolysis of Acylated Bispicolylamine Copper(II) Complexes
It is a well-established concept that the C−N bond cleavage of carboxamide functions is facilitated by the coordination
of a metal ion to the carbonyl oxygen atom. In contrast, the alternative C−N bond activation by coordination of a
neutral tertiary carboxamide nitrogen atom has not been studied. We present the first results on the effect of
nitrogen pyramidalization in N-coordinated metal complexes on the methanolysis of tertiary carboxamide groups.
An analysis of the reactions products obtained from the methanol cleavage of [(N-Acyl-bpa)Cu]2+ (bpa = N,N-bispicolylamine) complexes is presented together with experimental and high-level theoretically calculated structures.
The strong effect of different anions on the amide pyramidalization and subsequent C−N-bond cleavage is evaluated.
We show that dichloro complexes [(N-Acyl-bpa)CuCl2] have much less activated amide groups than the corresponding
triflate species. They should therefore be less reactive. However, [(N-Acyl-bpa)CuCl2] complexes dissociate in
solution to give cationic monochloro complexes [(N-Acyl-bpa)Cu(S)Cl]+ (S = solvent molecule). Theoretical calculations
show that the amide pyramidalization in the monochloro complexes is equal to that in the corresponding CF3SO3-
salts. Consequently, chloro and triflato complexes are cleaved with similar rates and efficiencies. Parallels to and
differences in the reactivity of purely organic distorted amides are discussed
Uyghur tribunal judgment
The People’s Republic of China’s (PRC’s) apparent long-term desire to eliminate the Uyghurs as a group was well known; but no nation and no international body dared to say as much about such a big and powerful state.
In 2020, at the request of the World Uyghur Congress, the Uyghur Tribunal of nine members, none expert or having particular interest in Uyghurs or China, was established to investigate ongoing atrocities and possible genocide against the Uyghurs, Kazakhs and other Turkic Muslim populations in Xinjiang.
A large body of evidence including where favourable to the PRC was gathered and 72 victim and expert witnesses were heard in three hearings. The PRC was invited on several occasions to participate but failed to respond. The Tribunal was supported by independent Counsel.
The Tribunal demonstrates the capacity and inclination of citizens everywhere to do what needs to be done without reward if their national and international institutions fail them.
The Tribunal approached its task with proper caution in making factual findings, only applying the law where there was complete clarity of the law and only making findings of fact and law when satisfied beyond reasonable doubt.
The Judgment found the PRC to have committed torture, crimes against humanity, and, by the imposition of measures to prevent births done with ‘intent to destroy a significant part of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang as such’, genocide.
The Judgment has been considered around the world assisting several parliaments to determine that the PRC has committed genocide of the Uyghurs - and has not been subject to substantive challenge.
The Tribunal members have done their work. Governments could easily have done what the Tribunal did – but didn’t.</p
Recommended from our members
Uyghur tribunal judgment
The People’s Republic of China’s (PRC’s) apparent long-term desire to eliminate the Uyghurs as a group was well known; but no nation and no international body dared to say as much about such a big and powerful state.
In 2020, at the request of the World Uyghur Congress, the Uyghur Tribunal of nine members, none expert or having particular interest in Uyghurs or China, was established to investigate ongoing atrocities and possible genocide against the Uyghurs, Kazakhs and other Turkic Muslim populations in Xinjiang.
A large body of evidence including where favourable to the PRC was gathered and 72 victim and expert witnesses were heard in three hearings. The PRC was invited on several occasions to participate but failed to respond. The Tribunal was supported by independent Counsel.
The Tribunal demonstrates the capacity and inclination of citizens everywhere to do what needs to be done without reward if their national and international institutions fail them.
The Tribunal approached its task with proper caution in making factual findings, only applying the law where there was complete clarity of the law and only making findings of fact and law when satisfied beyond reasonable doubt.
The Judgment found the PRC to have committed torture, crimes against humanity, and, by the imposition of measures to prevent births done with ‘intent to destroy a significant part of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang as such’, genocide.
The Judgment has been considered around the world assisting several parliaments to determine that the PRC has committed genocide of the Uyghurs - and has not been subject to substantive challenge.
The Tribunal members have done their work. Governments could easily have done what the Tribunal did – but didn’t.</p
Additional file 1 of The Translational Medicine Ontology and Knowledge Base: driving personalized medicine by bridging the gap between bench and bedside
Additional file 1: Supplement 01 (v03) to “The Translational Medicine Ontology and Knowledge Base: Driving personalized medicine by bridging the gap between bench and bedside” A supplemental document containing the TMKB SPARQL queries and results created for this manuscript. (PDF 476 KB
