Are Canadian Women Prepared for the Transition to Primary HPV Testing in Cervical Screening? A National Survey of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs

As Canadian provinces and territories prepare to transition to HPV-based primary screening for cervical cancer, failure to identify and address potential barriers to screening could hinder program implementation. We examined screening-eligible Canadians' attitudes towards and knowledge of cervical screening. A nationally representative sample of screening-eligible Canadians (N = 3724) completed a web-based survey in the summer of 2022. Oversampling ensured that half of the sample were underscreened for cervical cancer (>3 years since previous screening or never screened). The participants completed validated scales of cervical cancer, HPV, and HPV test knowledge and HPV test and self-sampling attitudes and beliefs. Between-group differences (underscreened vs. adequately screened) were calculated for scales and items using independent sample t-tests or chi-square tests. The underscreened participants (n = 1871) demonstrated significantly lower knowledge of cervical cancer, HPV, and the HPV test. The adequately screened participants (n = 1853) scored higher on the Confidence and Worries subscales of the HPV Test Attitudes and Beliefs Scale. The underscreened participants scored higher on the Personal Barriers and Social Norms subscales. The underscreened participants also endorsed greater Autonomy conferred by self-sampling. Our findings suggest important differential patterns of knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs between the underscreened and adequately screened Canadians. These findings highlight the need to develop targeted communication strategies and promote patient-centered, tailored approaches in cervical screening programs

Predictors of low cervical cancer screening among immigrant women in Ontario, Canada

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Disparities in cervical cancer screening are known to exist in Ontario, Canada for foreign-born women. The relative importance of various barriers to screening may vary across ethnic groups. This study aimed to determine how predictors of low cervical cancer screening, reflective of sociodemographics, the health care system, and migration, varied by region of origin for Ontario's immigrant women.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using a validated billing code algorithm, we determined the proportion of women who were not screened during the three-year period of 2006-2008 among 455 864 identified immigrant women living in Ontario's urban centres. We created eight identical multivariate Poisson models, stratified by eight regions of origin for immigrant women. In these models, we adjusted for various sociodemographic, health care-related and migration-related variables. We then used the resulting adjusted relative risks to calculate population-attributable fractions for each variable by region of origin.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Region of origin was not a significant source of effect modification for lack of recent cervical cancer screening. Certain variables were significantly associated with lack of screening across all or nearly all world regions. These consisted of not being in the 35-49 year age group, residence in the lowest-income neighbourhoods, not being in a primary care patient enrolment model, a provider from the same region, and not having a female provider. For all women, the highest population-attributable risk was seen for not having a female provider, with values ranging from 16.8% [95% CI 14.6-19.1%] among women from the Middle East and North Africa to 27.4% [95% CI 26.2-28.6%] for women from East Asia and the Pacific.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>To increase screening rates across immigrant groups, efforts should be made to ensure that women have access to a regular source of primary care, and ideally access to a female health professional. Efforts should also be made to increase the enrolment of immigrant women in new primary care patient enrolment models.</p

Building on existing tools to improve chronic disease prevention and screening in public health : a cluster randomized trial

This study was funded as a grant proposal entitled ‘Advancing Cancer Prevention Among Deprived Neighbourhoods’ by the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute grant #704042 and by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research Institute of Cancer grant OCP #145450. AL is supported by a CIHR New Investigator Award, and as Chair in Implementation Science at the Peter Gilgan Centre for Women’s Cancers at Women’s College Hospital in partnership with the Canadian Cancer Society.Background The BETTER (Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care) intervention was designed to integrate the approach to chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care and demonstrated effective in a previous randomized trial. Methods We tested the effectiveness of the BETTER HEALTH intervention, a public health adaptation of BETTER, at improving participation in chronic disease prevention and screening actions for residents of low-income neighbourhoods in a cluster randomized trial, with ten low-income neighbourhoods in Durham Region Ontario randomized to immediate intervention vs. wait-list. The unit of analysis was the individual, and eligible participants were adults age 40–64 years residing in the neighbourhoods. Public health nurses trained as “prevention practitioners” held one prevention-focused visit with each participant. They provided participants with a tailored prevention prescription and supported them to set health-related goals. The primary outcome was a composite index: the number of evidence-based actions achieved at six months as a proportion of those for which participants were eligible at baseline. Results Of 126 participants (60 in immediate arm; 66 in wait-list arm), 125 were included in analyses (1 participant withdrew consent). In both arms, participants were eligible for a mean of 8.6 actions at baseline. At follow-up, participants in the immediate intervention arm met 64.5% of actions for which they were eligible versus 42.1% in the wait-list arm (rate ratio 1.53 [95% confidence interval 1.22–1.84]). Conclusion Public health nurses using the BETTER HEALTH intervention led to a higher proportion of identified evidence-based prevention and screening actions achieved at six months for people living with socioeconomic disadvantage.Publisher PDFPeer reviewe

Creating Safe Connections: A Co-Designed E-Learning Module to Advance Equity and Social Accountability in Preventative Primary Care

Ambreen Sayani,1,2 Zeenat Ladak,1,3 Jackie Manthorne,4 Erika Nicholson,5 Gary C Bloch,6,7 Janet Parsons,2 Stephen W Hwang,6 Bikila Amenu,8 Howard Freedman,8 Tara Jeji,8 Angus Pratt,8 Vinesha Ramasamy,8 Jean-Claude Camus,8 C Nadine Wathen,9 Jennifer CD MacGregor,9 Danielle Dilkes,10,11 Aisha Lofters1,12,13 1Women’s College Hospital Research &amp; Innovation Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2Institute of Health Policy, Management &amp; Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 3Applied Psychology &amp; Human Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 4Board of Directors, Canadian Cancer Survivor Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 5Executive Team, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 6Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 7Board of Directors, Inner City Health Associates &amp; Health Providers Against Poverty, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 8Patient Partner, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 9Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; 10Centre for Teaching &amp; Learning, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; 11Curriculum, Teaching, &amp; Learning, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 12Department of Family &amp; Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 13Peter Gilgan Centre for Women’s Cancers, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaCorrespondence: Ambreen Sayani, Women’s College Hospital Research &amp; Innovation Institute, Women’s College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B2, Canada, Tel +1 416 323 6400 ext 3772, Email [email protected]: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and in Canada. Primary care providers (PCPs) play a vital role in incorporating lung cancer prevention and early detection into routine practice. This study outlines the co-design of Creating Safe Connections, an e-learning module developed to build PCPs’ capacity to deliver equity-oriented preventative care.Methods: This manuscript describes the pre-design and co-design phases of the innovation process, guided by the Generative Co-Design Framework for Healthcare Innovation. The pre-design phase established a governance structure comprising patient partners with lived/living experience and interest-holders including PCPs. During the co-design phase, key module priorities and research goals were identified, including barriers to access, stigma and trauma, and operationalizing equity-oriented care. All aspects of the module—its name, logo, content, and knowledge mobilization strategies—were co-developed with the patient partners and health system partners. To inform the e-learning module content, interviews were conducted with community-based PCPs in Ontario, Canada to explore how they apply equity-oriented skills in practice. Interviews were analyzed using deductive content analysis.Results: PCPs’ (five family physicians, two nurse practitioners) interview analysis was informed by the four pillars of Trauma- and Violence-Informed Care: recognizing the impact of trauma and violence; creating emotionally, culturally, and physically safe environments; promoting choice, collaboration, and connection; and adopting a strengths-based, capacity-building approach. These themes shaped the co-design of a Continuing Medical Education-accredited module, which includes video narratives, case studies, a learner’s notebook, and interactive assessments.Conclusion: This work offers a model for the participatory co-design of equity-focused educational interventions that bridge gaps in provider training while aligning with the care needs and priorities identified by structurally underserved populations. The module uses lung cancer screening as a case example to illustrate approaches to addressing inequities in preventative care.Keywords: patient-partnered, accessibility, asynchronous learning, patient-centered care, lung cancer screening, smoking cessation, trauma- and violence-informed care, co-design, lived experience expertis

Understanding unequal ageing: towards a synthesis of intersectionality and life course analyses

Intersectionality has received an increasing amount of attention in health inequalities research in recent years. It suggests that treating social characteristics separately—mainly age, gender, ethnicity, and socio-economic position—does not match the reality that people simultaneously embody multiple characteristics and are therefore potentially subject to multiple forms of discrimination. Yet the intersectionality literature has paid very little attention to the nature of ageing or the life course, and gerontology has rarely incorporated insights from intersectionality. In this paper, we aim to illustrate how intersectionality might be synthesised with a life course perspective to deliver novel insights into unequal ageing, especially with respect to health. First we provide an overview of how intersectionality can be used in research on inequality, focusing on intersectional subgroups, discrimination, categorisation, and individual heterogeneity. We cover two key approaches—the use of interaction terms in conventional models and multilevel models which are particularly focussed on granular subgroup differences. In advancing a conceptual dialogue with the life course perspective, we discuss the concepts of roles, life stages, transitions, age/cohort, cumulative disadvantage/advantage, and trajectories. We conclude that the synergies between intersectionality and the life course hold exciting opportunities to bring new insights to unequal ageing and its attendant health inequalities

The state of HRM in the Middle East:Challenges and future research agenda

Based on a robust structured literature analysis, this paper highlights the key developments in the field of human resource management (HRM) in the Middle East. Utilizing the institutional perspective, the analysis contributes to the literature on HRM in the Middle East by focusing on four key themes. First, it highlights the topical need to analyze the context-specific nature of HRM in the region. Second, via the adoption of a systematic review, it highlights state of development in HRM in the research analysis set-up. Third, the analysis also helps to reveal the challenges facing the HRM function in the Middle East. Fourth, it presents an agenda for future research in the form of research directions. While doing the above, it revisits the notions of “universalistic” and “best practice” HRM (convergence) versus “best-fit” or context distinctive (divergence) and also alternate models/diffusion of HRM (crossvergence) in the Middle Eastern context. The analysis, based on the framework of cross-national HRM comparisons, helps to make both theoretical and practical implications

Canadian oncogenic human papillomavirus cervical infection prevalence: Systematic review and meta-analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infection prevalence is required to determine optimal vaccination strategies. We systematically reviewed the prevalence of oncogenic cervical HPV infection among Canadian females prior to immunization.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We included studies reporting DNA-confirmed oncogenic HPV prevalence estimates among Canadian females identified through searching electronic databases (e.g., MEDLINE) and public health websites. Two independent reviewers screened literature results, abstracted data and appraised study quality. Prevalence estimates were meta-analyzed among routine screening populations, HPV-positive, and by cytology/histology results.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Thirty studies plus 21 companion reports were included after screening 837 citations and 120 full-text articles. Many of the studies did not address non-response bias (74%) or use a representative sampling strategy (53%).</p> <p>Age-specific prevalence was highest among females aged < 20 years and slowly declined with increasing age. Across all populations, the highest prevalence estimates from the meta-analyses were observed for HPV types 16 (routine screening populations, 8 studies: 8.6% [95% confidence interval 6.5-10.7%]; HPV-infected, 9 studies: 43.5% [28.7-58.2%]; confirmed cervical cancer, 3 studies: 48.8% [34.0-63.6%]) and 18 (routine screening populations, 8 studies: 3.3% [1.5-5.1%]; HPV-infected, 9 studies: 13.6% [6.1-21.1%], confirmed cervical cancer, 4 studies: 17.1% [6.4-27.9%].</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results support vaccinating females < 20 years of age, along with targeted vaccination of some groups (e.g., under-screened populations). The highest prevalence occurred among HPV types 16 and 18, contributing a combined cervical cancer prevalence of 65.9%. Further cancer protection is expected from cross-protection of non-vaccine HPV types. Poor study quality and heterogeneity suggests that high-quality studies are needed.</p