44 research outputs found
The effect of functional splinting on mild dysplastic hips after walking onset
BACKGROUND: For treatment of Graf class IIb dysplastic hips at walking onset a treatment concept with abduction splints allowing patterns as walking and crawling under constant abduction control was investigated. However, as the splint still incapacitates child movements the research question remains whether the physiologically progressing maturation of hips can be significantly altered using such abduction splints for walking children. METHODS: Of 106 children showing late hip dysplasia, 68 children treated with the Hoffman-Daimler (HD-splint) abduction splint were compared with 38 children with neglect of the abduction treatment in this retrospective study. Radiographic analyses were performed measuring the development of the age dependent acetabular angle. RESULTS: The regression analysis for splint treatment showed a significant linear regression for both splint treatment and no splint treatment group (r(2 )= 0,31 respectively r(2 )= 0,33). No statistical difference between both treatment groups was apparent. CONCLUSION: Considering the characteristics of this study, there seems to be no strong rationale supporting the use of an abduction device in growing children. As no significant difference between treatment groups is apparent, a future controlled prospective study on splinting effects can be considered ethically allowed
Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case–control study
Is the Prevalence of Specific Types of Congenital Heart Defects Different for Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic Infants?
Reliability of Ultrasonography in the follow-up of Hip Dysplasia in Children above 2 Years of Age
Purpose: the aim of the present study was to assess whether ultrasonography (US) was reliable in the follow-up of children above 2 years of age who had previously been treated for congenital or developmental hip dislocation or dysplasia (HD). Material and Methods: As part of the routine follow-up, we examined 53 children (106 hips), aged 2–12 years (mean 6 years). Using US, the coverage of the femoral head was assessed by the distance from the lateral tangent of the ossified femoral head to the lateral bony acetabular rim (lateral head distance, LHD). the corresponding distance was measured on radiographs (LHDR). the radiographic femoral head coverage was assessed by the migration percentage (MP) and the center-edge (CE) angle. Results: We found a good accordance between sonographic LHD and the radiographic parameters MP and CE in all age groups, indicating that femoral head coverage was reliably assessed by US. There was also a high correlation between LHD and LHDR (r=0.85). All hips with subluxation were detected by US. In 11 hips that appeared normal on US, but with dysplasia or uncertain findings by radiography, the condition spontaneously normalized in 9 out of 9 examined hips with further follow-up. Conclusion: Because a reliable assessment of the hip is obtained, we recommend that US should be used as the primary imaging technique in the routine follow-up of children above 2 years of age with previous HD. Radiography should be omitted when US shows normal findings and is only needed when the US LHD is above the upper normal limit or the hip looks abnormal or suspicious by subjective evaluation. </jats:p
Intra-articular hyaluronan injections in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled multicentre trial. Hyaluronan Multicentre Trial Group.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of intra-articular injections of hyaluronan on symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Two hundred and forty patients with symptomatic, radiological knee OA were randomly assigned to treatment with weekly injections for five weeks with either 25 mg of high molecular weight hyaluronan or vehicle. Results were evaluated at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, and 20 by visual analogue scales (pain, function, motion, activity), algofunctional index, and global evaluation by patient and investigator. Analysis was by "intention to treat', "per protocol', and area under the curve principles on unstratified patient groups and for patients stratified into four groups of equal size by age and baseline algofunctional index. RESULTS: No serious side effects were reported. At 20 weeks both treatment groups were improved compared with baseline, with no difference between unstratified groups treated with placebo or hyaluronan. Comparison of treatment groups stratified by age and baseline algofunctional index revealed a significant difference in favour of hyaluronan over placebo (pain, activity, algofunctional index, global evaluations by patient and investigator) for patients older than 60 years and with a baseline algofunctional index greater than 10. There was no clinically relevant difference between the two treatments for the other three stratified subgroups of younger age or fewer symptoms. Similar results were obtained by area under the curve, intention to treat, and per protocol analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients older than 60 years with knee osteoarthritis and with significant symptoms corresponding to an index of severity of knee disease of 10 or more, comprise the group most likely to benefit from treatment with intra-articular hyaluronan injections
