Long-Term Locoregional Vascular Morbidity After Isolated Limb Perfusion and External-Beam Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity

Background: Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and melphalan, followed by delayed surgical resection and adjuvant external-beam radiotherapy is a limb salvage treatment strategy for locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas. The long-term vascular side effects of this combined procedure were evaluated. Methods: Thirty-two patients were treated for a locally advanced sarcoma of the upper (n = 5) or lower limb (n = 27). All patients underwent a noninvasive vascular work-up. Results: Five patients underwent a leg amputation, in two cases due to critical leg ischemia 10 years after ILP. With a median follow-up of 88 (range, 17-159) months, none of the patients with a salvaged lower leg (n = 22) experienced peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements in the involved leg (median, 1.02; range, .50-1.20) showed a significant decrease compared with the contralateral leg (median, 1.09; range, .91-1.36, P = .001). Pulsatility index (PI) was decreased in the treated leg in 17 of 22 patients at the femoral level (median, 6.30; range, 2.1-23.9 vs. median, 7.35; range, 4.8-21.9; P = .011) and in 19 of 20 patients at popliteal level (median, 8.35; range, 0-21.4 vs. median, 10.95; range, 8.0-32.6; P <.0005). In patients with follow-up of > 5 years, there was more often a decrease in ABI (P = .024) and PI at femoral level (P = .011). Conclusions: ILP followed by resection and external-beam radiotherapy can lead to major late vascular morbidity that requires amputation. Objective measurements show a time-related decrease of ABI and femoral PI in the treated extremity

Isolated Limb Perfusion and External Beam Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremity: Long-Term Effects on Normal Tissue According to the LENT-SOMA Scoring System

BACKGROUND: With the combined treatment procedure of isolated limb perfusion (ILP), delayed surgical resection and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities, limb salvage rates of more than 80% can be achieved. However, long-term damage to the healthy surrounding tissue cannot be prevented. We studied the late effects on the normal tissue using the LENT-SOMA scoring system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 32 patients-median age 47 (range 14-71) years-were treated for a locally advanced STS with ILP, surgical resection and often adjuvant 60-70 Gy EBRT. After a median follow-up of 88 (range 17-159) months, the patients were scored, using the LENT-SOMA scales, for the following late tissue damage: muscle/soft tissue, peripheral nerves, skin/subcutaneous tissue and vessels. RESULTS: According to the individual SOM parameters of the LENT-SOMA scales, 20 patients (63%) scored grade-3 toxicity on one or more separate items, reflecting severe symptoms with a negative impact on daily activities. Of these patients, 3 (9%) even scored grade-4 toxicity on some of the parameters, denoting irreversible functional damage necessitating major therapeutic intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In evaluating long-term morbidity after a combined treatment procedure for STS of the extremity, using modified LENT-SOMA scores, two-thirds of patients were found to have experienced serious late toxic effects

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with tumour necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan as palliative limb-saving treatment in patients with locally advanced soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities with regional or distant metastases. Is it worthwhile?

The management of locally advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities in patients who present with regional and/or distant metastases at the time of diagnosis remains an unsolved problem. The recently introduced hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and melphalan has been shown to be an effective limb-saving treatment modality, but is it feasible to use this approach with palliative intent? Nine patients, five men and four women, mean age 41 (range 21-75) years with locally advanced extremity STS and regional (n = 3) or distant (n = 6) metastases at the time of diagnosis, underwent a palliative HILP with TNF-alpha and melphalan. Resection of the residual tumour mass was performed, if possible, 6-8 weeks after HILP. Treatment-related morbidity, local recurrences and the limb salvage rare were scored during follow-up. The median follow-up period was 9 (range 3-39) months (seven deaths, but six were due to metastatic disease). Treatment-related morbidity was seen after 3 of the 10 perfusions performed (30%) and consisted of superficial wound infections (n = 2), blow out of the external iliac artery followed by an iliac thrombosis (n = I). Two patients showed local recurrences after HILP followed by resection of the residual tumour mass, and one patient showed local progression after two perfusions without resection. Limb salvage was achieved in 8 patients (89%). Therefore, HILP with TNF-alpha and melphalan for locally advanced extremity STS in patients with disseminated disease is feasible. The local management of locally advanced extremity STS should be the same whether the intent is curative or palliative, as the local control improves the quality of life

FUNCTIONAL MORBIDITY OF HYPERTHERMIC ISOLATED REGIONAL PERFUSION OF THE EXTREMITIES

Background: Isolated regional perfusion (IRP) of an extremity is a major operation. The therapeutic value for stage I melanoma is still controversial and is presently being investigated in a prospective, randomized study by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. So far there are no reliable data available concerning the morbidity of IRP. Therefore, we performed a prospective, randomized study on this topic. Methods: In a prospective study, a group of 97 patients with a stage I melanoma localized on an arm or leg were randomized for IRP with melphalan followed by wide excision (WE) and fasciotomy or for WE only. Morbidity was evaluated on the basis of the following parameters: duration of hospitalization, postoperative pain, postoperative performance, and grade of perfusion toxicity. At 12-month follow-up, a physical diagnostic examination was performed to measure the mobility of the joints, and the circumference and volume of the treated and untreated extremities. Results: All the parameters, including the physical diagnostic examination, could be evaluated in 83 of the 97 patients (8 patients died of metastatic disease and 1 patient died of another disease before they could be investigated; 2 patients were in too poor physical condition due to metastases to be examined, and 3 patients were unable to participate for nonmedical reasons). Age and sex distribution were comparable in the various patient groups. Treatment mortality was 0%. There were no complications except for urine retention (one patient) and wound dehiscence (one patient). After IRP + WE of the lower limb, the period of hospitalization was an average of 1.9 days longer (p = 0.01) than for WE on the limb only. This difference was absent for the arm. Naturally after perfusion, there was a significant difference in toxic reactions (edema and pain) between the IRP + WE patients and the WE-only patients. However, at 12-month follow-up, the difference in morbidity between IRP + WE and WE-only patients was no longer present: Morbidity of joints and circumference of the limb were the same. A number of subjective complaints were encountered fairly often after IRP + WE (e.g., pricking sensations or pain during changes in the weather), which can possibly be explained by fibrosis caused by perfusion. These complaints were not quantified further because they did not hinder the patients' functioning. Conclusions: In the long term, IRP with fasciotomy does not cause any additional morbidity. Immediately after the operation, there was more morbidity as a result of the perfusion, which caused a 2-day- longer period of hospitalization in the patients with lower-limb perfusion compared with those who underwent WE only. These findings are in contrast to those in the literature, in which 25% limitation of motion in the ankle joint after perfusion is mentioned. One explanation may be that we always performed fasciotomy after perfusion to prevent (sub)clinical compression syndrome and avoid late fibrosis

Angiographic response of locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma following hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor

Background: Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), and melphalan is associated with a dramatic anti-tumor effect in which the neo-vascularization of the tumor is supposed to be the major target, The aim of the present study was to correlate the angiographic findings with the pathological response in patients undergoing HILP for locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma, Patients and Methods: Twenty-five patients, 14 male and 11 female, mean age 47 years (range 18-80) were studied. Angiographies were performed before and a median period of 7 weeks (range 4-14 weeks) after HILP. Eight weeks after perfusion, the residual tumor mass was resected and pathologically examined, The changes in tumor vascularization after treatment were scored and compared with the pathological response, Results: All baseline angiograms showed a hypervascular tumor. After HILP, a normal angiography result (NA) was observed in 18 patients (72%) and an abnormal angiography result (AA) was observed in seven patients (28%). All patients with an NA showed a pathologically complete response (pCR) or a pathological partial response with >90% necrosis of the tumor, Of seven patients with an AA, pathological examination showed a PCR in one patient, 10-50% viable tumor volume in four patients, and no pathological response after perfusion in two patients. A good correlation was seen between angiographic and pathological classification (p <0.001), Conclusion: An angiography performed after hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with TNF-alpha and melphalan provides a good indication, regardless of whether a good pathological response is expected

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor alpha, interferon gamma, and melphalan for locally advanced nonmelanoma skin tumors of the extremities - A multicenter study

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interferon gamma, and melphalan has proved to be useful in the treatment of recurrent malignant melanoma and of locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether this modality is also effective in the treatment of locally advanced nonmelanoma skin tumors of the extremities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with locally advanced primary, recurrent, or metastatic skin tumors of the extremities (12 with squamous cell carcinoma and 3 with Merkel cell carcinoma) underwent HILP with TNF-alpha, interferon gamma, and melphalan. Six tumors were localized in the upper extremity (40%), and 9 in the lower extremity (60%). Treatment-related complications, limb salvage rate, local recurrence, and regional and distant metastases were scored during a median follow-up of 20 months. RESULTS: After HILP, 9 patients (60%) showed a complete response (with histopathological confirmation). Four patients (27%) showed a partial response (with histopathological confirmation in 1 patient), and 2 patients (13%) showed no change (with histopathological confirmation in 1 patient and with clinical evidence in 1 patient). Two patients (13%) showed treatment-related complications. The limb salvage was achieved in 12 patients (80%), and the local recurrences developed in 4 patients (27%). During follow-up, regional lymph node metastases were observed in 2 patients (13%) and distant metastases in 2 patients (13%). CONCLUSION: Based on our results, HILP with TNF-alpha, interferon gamma, and melphalan should be considered as a limb-saving treatment modality in patients with locally advanced nonmelanoma skin tumors of the extremities who would otherwise be candidates for ablative surgery