Does the mind map learning strategy facilitate information retrieval and critical thinking in medical students?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A learning strategy underutilized in medical education is mind mapping. Mind maps are multi-sensory tools that may help medical students organize, integrate, and retain information. Recent work suggests that using mind mapping as a note-taking strategy facilitates critical thinking. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a relationship existed between mind mapping and critical thinking, as measured by the Health Sciences Reasoning Test (HSRT), and whether a relationship existed between mind mapping and recall of domain-based information.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In this quasi-experimental study, 131 first-year medical students were randomly assigned to a standard note-taking (SNT) group or mind map (MM) group during orientation. Subjects were given a demographic survey and pre-HSRT. They were then given an unfamiliar text passage, a pre-quiz based upon the passage, and a 30-minute break, during which time subjects in the MM group were given a presentation on mind mapping. After the break, subjects were given the same passage and wrote notes based on their group (SNT or MM) assignment. A post-quiz based upon the passage was administered, followed by a post-HSRT. Differences in mean pre- and post-quiz scores between groups were analyzed using independent samples <it>t</it>-tests, whereas differences in mean pre- and post-HSRT total scores and subscores between groups were analyzed using ANOVA. Mind map depth was assessed using the Mind Map Assessment Rubric (MMAR).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There were no significant differences in mean scores on both the pre- and post-quizzes between note-taking groups. And, no significant differences were found between pre- and post-HSRT mean total scores and subscores.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Although mind mapping was not found to increase short-term recall of domain-based information or critical thinking compared to SNT, a brief introduction to mind mapping allowed novice MM subjects to perform similarly to SNT subjects. This demonstrates that medical students using mind maps can successfully retrieve information in the short term, and does not put them at a disadvantage compared to SNT students. Future studies should explore longitudinal effects of mind-map proficiency training on both short- and long-term information retrieval and critical thinking.</p

Interrater reliability of the mind map assessment rubric in a cohort of medical students

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Learning strategies are thinking tools that students can use to actively acquire information. Examples of learning strategies include mnemonics, charts, and maps. One strategy that may help students master the tsunami of information presented in medical school is the mind map learning strategy. Currently, there is no valid and reliable rubric to grade mind maps and this may contribute to their underutilization in medicine. Because concept maps and mind maps engage learners similarly at a metacognitive level, a valid and reliable concept map assessment scoring system was adapted to form the mind map assessment rubric (MMAR). The MMAR can assess mind map depth based upon concept-links, cross-links, hierarchies, examples, pictures, and colors. The purpose of this study was to examine interrater reliability of the MMAR.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This exploratory study was conducted at a US medical school as part of a larger investigation on learning strategies. Sixty-six (<it>N </it>= 66) first-year medical students were given a 394-word text passage followed by a 30-minute presentation on mind mapping. After the presentation, subjects were again given the text passage and instructed to create mind maps based upon the passage. The mind maps were collected and independently scored using the MMAR by 3 examiners. Interrater reliability was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (<it>ICC</it>) statistic. Statistics were calculated using SPSS version 12.0 (Chicago, IL).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Analysis of the mind maps revealed the following: concept-links <it>ICC </it>= .05 (95% CI, -.42 to .38), cross-links <it>ICC </it>= .58 (95% CI, .37 to .73), hierarchies <it>ICC </it>= .23 (95% CI, -.15 to .50), examples <it>ICC </it>= .53 (95% CI, .29 to .69), pictures <it>ICC </it>= .86 (95% CI, .79 to .91), colors <it>ICC </it>= .73 (95% CI, .59 to .82), and total score <it>ICC </it>= .86 (95% CI, .79 to .91).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The high <it>ICC </it>value for total mind map score indicates strong MMAR interrater reliability. Pictures and colors demonstrated moderate to strong interrater reliability. We conclude that the MMAR may be a valid and reliable tool to assess mind maps in medicine. However, further research on the validity and reliability of the MMAR is necessary.</p

Anatomico-radiologic study of the distribution of the suboccipital artery of Salmon.

The frequency of suboccipital injections to treat headaches has increased. The third segment of the vertebral artery is located in the suboccipital triangle and its main muscular branch, the suboccipital artery of Salmon (SAS), supplies blood to the suboccipital muscles. The purpose of this study was to radiographically investigate the morphology and territory of distribution of SAS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Computed tomography angiographs of brains of 50 subjects (25 female, 25 men, mean age 70.2 years) were analyzed. RESULTS: SAS was present in 48% of subjects. The vessel was present bilaterally in 37.1%, and had a mean (SD) luminal diameter of 1.71 (0.34)mm and mean (SD) length of 36.42 (17.1)mm. SAS was found to have two morphologic patterns: (1) a single main trunk with collateral branches (52.6%) and (2) a short common trunk that divided into two branches (48.4%). The SAS supplied the obliquus capitis inferior, semispinalis capitis, and splenius capitis muscles. When the SAS was absent, the suboccipital muscles were supplied by a branch of the occipital artery. No anastomoses were found between the SAS and occipital artery. CONCLUSION: The suboccipital muscles are vascularized by the SAS and occipital artery. The detailed course of the SAS is important for clinicians and surgeons who perform procedures in the suboccipital region