Stability Considerations for Final Focus Systems of Future Linear Colliders

The final focus systems for the future linear colliders need to focus beams to nm-range spot sizes at the collision point. The design spot size varies from several nm for 500 GeV to the one nm range for 3 TeV. In order to keep the beams in collision and to maintain the luminosity stringent stability optimization must be applied. We discuss different sources of beam perturbations and estimate the expected beamline stability based on previous experimental observations. Possible measures for beam stabilization are discussed and plans of further collaborative efforts are outlined

The Next Linear Collider machine protection system

The Next Linear Collider (NLC) electron and positron beams are capable of damaging the linac accelerating structure and beamline vacuum chambers during an individual aberrant accelerator pulse. Machine protection system (MPS) considerations, outlined in this paper, have an impact on the engineering and design of most machine components downstream of the damping ring injector complex. The MPS consists of two functional levels. The first is a system that provides a benign, single bunch, low intensity, high emittance beam that will be used for commissioning and at any time that the integrity or the settings of the downstream component are in doubt. This level also provides for the smooth transition back and forth between high power operation and the benign diagnostic pilot bunch operation. The pilot bunch parameters in the main linac are estimated on the basis of the expected stress in the accelerator structure copper. Beam tests have been done at the SLAC linac to examine the behaviour of the copper at the damage stress threshold. Typical pilot beam parameters (compared with nominal) are: 10 times reduced intensity, 10 times increased horizontal emittance and 1000 times increased vertical emittance, resulting in a reduction in charge density of 105. The second level is the primary protection against a single aberrant pulse. It’s goal is to reduce the possibility that a substantial transverse field changes the trajectory of the high power beam from one pulse to the next. All devices that could produce such a field are 1) monitored by a fast response network and 2) have deliberately slowed response times. A ‘maximum allowable interpulse difference ’ is evaluated for each such device as well as the beam trajectory monitors in each interpulse period.

A Large Hadron Electron Collider at CERN

This document provides a brief overview of the recently published report on the design of the Large Hadron Electron Collider (LHeC), which comprises its physics programme, accelerator physics, technology and main detector concepts. The LHeC exploits and develops challenging, though principally existing, accelerator and detector technologies. This summary is complemented by brief illustrations of some of the highlights of the physics programme, which relies on a vastly extended kinematic range, luminosity and unprecedented precision in deep inelastic scattering. Illustrations are provided regarding high precision QCD, new physics (Higgs, SUSY) and electron-ion physics. The LHeC is designed to run synchronously with the LHC in the twenties and to achieve an integrated luminosity of O(100) fb$^{-1}$. It will become the cleanest high resolution microscope of mankind and will substantially extend as well as complement the investigation of the physics of the TeV energy scale, which has been enabled by the LHC

The trajectory control in the SLC linac

Due to wake field effects, the trajectories of accelerated beams in the Linac should be well maintained to avoid severe beam breakup. In order to maintain a small emittance at the end of the Linac, the tolerance on the trajectory deviations become tighter when the beam intensities increase. The existing two beam trajectory correction method works well when the theoretical model agrees with the real machine lattice. Unknown energy deviations along the linac as well as wake field effects can cause the real lattice to deviate from the model. This makes the trajectory correction difficult. Several automated procedures have been developed to solve these problems. They are: an automated procedure to frequently steer the whole Linac by dividing the Linac into several small regions; an automated procedure to empirically correct the model to fit the real lattice and eight trajectory correcting feedback loops along the linac and steering through the collimator region with restricted corrector strengths and a restricted number of correctors. 6 refs., 2 figs

A reanalysis of B0-B0 mixing in e+e- annihilation at 29 GeV

Data taken by the Mark II detector at the PEP storage ring was used to measure the rate of dilepton production in multihadronic events produced by e+e- annihilation at [radical sign]s=29 GeV. We determine the probability that a hadron initially containing a b (b) quark decays to a positive (negative) lepton to be 0.17-0.08+0.15, with 90% confidence level limits of 0.06 and 0.38.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/28616/3/0000428.pd

Search for B-decay to Higgs bosons for Higgs boson masses between 50 and 210 MeV/c2

We use data from the Mark II experiment at PEP to search for the process B-->h0X for mh0 between 50 and 210 MeV/c2. No evidence for the Higgs boson is seen in this mass range. The limit obtained rules out the standard Higgs boson for masses between 70 and 210 MeV/c2 and significantly constrains extensions of the Higgs sector.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/27719/1/0000107.pd