Positioning novel biologicals in CKD-mineral and bone disorders

Renal osteodystrophy (ROD), the histologic bone lesions of chronic kidney disease (CKD), is now included in a wider syndrome with laboratory abnormalities of mineral metabolism and extra-skeletal calcifications or CKD-mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBD), to highlight the increased burden of mortality. Aging people, frequently identified as early CKD, could suffer from either the classical age-related osteoporosis (OP) or ROD. Distinguishing between these two bone diseases may not be easy without bone biopsy. In any case, besides classical therapies for ROD, nephrologists are now challenged by the possibility of using new drugs developed for OP. Importantly, while therapies for ROD mostly aim at controlling parathyroid secretion with bone effects regarded as indirect, new drugs for OP directly modulate bone cells activity. Thus, their action could be useful in specific types of ROD. Parathyroid hormone therapy, which is anabolic in OP, could be useful in renal patients with low turnover bone disease. Denosumab, the monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANK-L) that inhibits osteoclast activity and proliferation, could be beneficial in cases with high turnover bone. Use of romosozumab, the monoclonal antibody against sclerostin, which both stimulates osteoblasts and inhibits osteoclasts, could allow both anabolic and anti-resorptive effects. However, we should not forget the systemic role now attributed to CKD-MBD. In fact, therapies targeting bone cells activity could also result in unpredicted extra-bone effects and affect cardiovascular outcomes. In conclusion, the new biologicals established for OP could be useful in renal patients with either OP or ROD. In addition, their potential non-bone effects warrant investigation

Educating end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis modality selection: a clinical advice from the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) advisory board

status: publishe

Air pollution and kidney disease: Review of current evidence

Along with amazing technological advances, the industrial revolution of the mid-19th century introduced new sources of pollution. By the mid-20th century, the effects of these changes were beginning to be felt around the world. Among these changes, health problems due to environmental air pollution are increasingly recognized. At the beginning, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases were emphasized. However, accumulated data indicate that every organ system in the body may be involved, and the kidney is no exception. Although research on air pollution and kidney damage is recent, there is now scientific evidence that air pollution harms the kidney. In this holistic review, we have summarized the epidemiology, disease states and mechanisms of air pollution and kidney damage

The future of European Nephrology 'Guidelines' - a declaration of intent by European Renal Best Practice (ERBP)

The disparities of medical practice, together with a growing number of possible interventions, have increased the demand for well-conceived guidance for practitioners [1]. However, this development is hampered by the number and quality of scientific studies that test medical hypotheses, which are often unsatisfactory. This is especially true in nephrology, where well-conducted controlled trials are rare [2]. Because patients with renal failure are generally excluded from controlled studies in the general population [3], the development of sufficiently well-founded guidance in nephrology has always been difficult. With the development of European Best Practice Guidelines (EBPG), the European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplantation Association (ERA–EDTA) has created its own guidance-generating process. Similar initiatives have also arisen in the USA (Kidney Disease Outcome Initiative—K/DOQI), Australia (Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment—CARI), Canada (Canadian Society of Nephrology—CSN), the UK (United Kingdom Renal Association—UKRA), as well as at several other locations around the world. These institutions have generated a plethora of often parallel recommendations on similar topics but sometimes with different messages [4]. The question can be asked: ‘Is there still a place for an institution generating European nephrology guidance?’ If there is, how should such an initiative be managed to conform with current demands? To answer these questions, the Council of ERA–EDTA set up a commission that convened three times in the course of 2008–09. The present text is a distillation of the discussions, reflections and final conclusions of this commission. It is an ad hoc document, reflecting the current status. In the future, concepts and attitudes might change, as medical thinking is influenced by changes in practice, needs, general philosophy, ethics and political/financial conditions

Effect of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade in adults with diabetes mellitus and advanced chronic kidney disease not on dialysis : a systematic review and meta-analysis

The presumed superiority of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS)-blocking agents over other antihypertensive agents in patients with diabetes to delay development of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) has recently been challenged. In addition, there is ongoing uncertainty whether RAAS-blocking agents reduce mortality and/or delay ESKD in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-5. In this subgroup, there might be an expedited need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) when RAAS-blocking agents are used. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of at least 6-months duration in adult patients with diabetes who also have non-dialysis CKD stages 3-5. RCTs comparing single RAAS-blocking agents to placebo or alternative antihypertensive agents were included. Outcomes of interest were allcause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, progression of renal function, ESKD and adverse events. A total of nine trials (n = 9797 participants with CKD stages 3-5) fit our inclusion criteria. There was no difference between the RAAS group and control group regarding all-cause mortality {relative risk [RR] = 0.97 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.10]}, cardiovascular mortality [RR = 1.03 (95% CI 0.75-1.41)] and adverse events [RR = 1.05 (95% CI 0.89-1.25)]. There was a trend for a favourable effect for non-fatal cardiovascular events [RR = 0.90 (95% CI 0.81-1.00)] and a lower risk of the composite endpoint need for RRT/doubling of serum creatinine [RR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.92)] in the RAAS-blocking agents group versus the control group. We found evidence that in patients with diabetes mellitus and CKD stages 3-5, treatment with RAAS-blocking agents did not result in a clear survival advantage. The effect on renal outcomes did depend on the selected outcome measure. However, we did not find evidence that the use of RAAS-blocking agents expedited the need for RRT in patients with CKD stages 3-5

Understanding the Role of Sex Hormones in Cardiovascular Kidney Metabolic Syndrome: Toward Personalized Therapeutic Approaches

Cardiovascular kidney metabolic syndrome; Chronic kidney disease; Sex hormoneSíndrome metabólico renal cardiovascular; Enfermedad renal crónica; Hormonas sexualesSíndrome metabòlica renal cardiovascular; Malaltia renal crònica; Hormones sexualsCardiovascular kidney metabolic (CKM) syndrome represents a complex interplay of cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and metabolic comorbidities, posing a significant public health challenge. Gender exerts a critical influence on CKM syndrome, affecting the disease severity and onset through intricate interactions involving sex hormones and key physiological pathways such as the renin–angiotensin system, oxidative stress, inflammation, vascular disease and insulin resistance. It is widely known that beyond the contribution of traditional risk factors, men and women exhibit significant differences in CKM syndrome and its components, with distinct patterns observed in premenopausal women and postmenopausal women compared to men. Despite women generally experiencing a lower incidence of CVD, their outcomes following cardiovascular events are often worse compared to men. The disparities also extend to the treatment approaches for kidney failure, with a higher prevalence of dialysis among men despite women exhibiting higher rates of CKD. The impact of endogenous sex hormones, the correlations between CKM and its components, as well as the long-term effects of treatment modalities using sex hormones, including hormone replacement therapies and gender-affirming therapies, have drawn attention to this topic. Current research on CKM syndrome is hindered by the scarcity of large-scale studies and insufficient integration of gender-specific considerations into treatment strategies. The underlying mechanisms driving the gender disparities in the pathogenesis of CKM syndrome, including the roles of estrogen, progesterone and testosterone derivatives, remain poorly understood, thus limiting their application in personalized therapeutic interventions. This review synthesizes existing knowledge to clarify the intricate relationship between sex hormones, gender disparities, and the progression of CVD within CKM syndrome. By addressing these knowledge gaps, this study aims to guide future research efforts and promote tailored approaches for effectively managing CKD syndrome

An Update on Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease

Despite the improvements in diagnostic tools and medical applications, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), especially coronary artery disease (CAD), remain the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The main factors for the heightened risk in this population, beside advanced age and a high proportion of diabetes and hypertension, are malnutrition, chronic inflammation, accelerated atherosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction, coronary artery calcification, left ventricular structural and functional abnormalities, and bone mineral disorders. Chronic kidney disease is now recognized as an independent risk factor for CAD. In community-based studies, decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and proteinuria were both found to be independently associated with CAD. This paper will discuss classical and recent epidemiologic, pathophysiologic, and clinical aspects of CAD in CKD patients

Glomerular hyperfiltration as a therapeutic target for CKD

The global burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is high and increasing. Early diagnosis and intervention are key to improve outcomes. Single-nephron glomerular hyperfiltration is an early pathophysiologic manifestation of CKD that may result in absolute glomerular hyperfiltration, i.e. a high glomerular filtration rate (GFR), or be associated with normal or low GFR because of nephron loss (relative glomerular hyperfiltration). Even though compensatory glomerular hyperfiltration may contribute to maintain kidney function after the loss of kidney mass, the associated increased glomerular capillary pressure and glomerular and podocyte size drive podocyte loss, albuminuria and proximal tubular overload, contributing to CKD progression. In this regard, all kidney protective drugs in clinical use so far, from renin–angiotensin system blockers to mineralocorticoid receptor blockers to sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors to tolvaptan, induce an early dip in glomerular filtration that is thought to represent reversal of hyperfiltration. As glomerular hyperfiltration may be present early in the course of kidney disease, its recognition may provide an effective intervention window that may predate current criteria based on high albuminuria or loss of GFR. Nevertheless, there is no diagnostic method with high sensitivity and specificity to identify single-nephron glomerular hyperfiltration, except when it leads to obvious absolute glomerular hyperfiltration, as observed in the early stages of diabetic kidney disease when nephron mass is still preserved. We now review the concept of glomerular hyperfiltration as an indicator of CKD risk, including definitions, challenges in diagnosis and evaluation, underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, potential therapeutic approaches and unanswered questionsThis study was not funded by any grant. A.O.’s research is funded by Comunidad de Madrid en Biomedicina P2022/BMD-7223, CIFRA_COR-CM, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) FIS/Fondos FEDER (PI22/00469, PI22/00050, PI21/00251, ERAPerMed-JTC2022 (SPAREKID AC22/00027), RICORS program to RICORS2040 (RD21/0005/0001) funded by the European Union–NextGenerationEU, Mecanismo para la Recuperación y la Resiliencia (MRR) and SPACKDc PMP21/00109, FEDER funds, COST Action PERMEDIK CA21165, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology); PREVENTCKD Consortium. Project ID: 101101220, Programme: EU4H DG/Agency: HADE