Higher risk of tuberculosis reactivation when anti-TNF is combined with immunosuppressive agents. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Objective. Treatment with tumour necrosis factor antagonists (anti-TNF) has been recognized as a risk factor for tuberculosis (TB) reactivation. Our aim was to evaluate risk of TB reactivation in rheumatologic and non-rheumatologic diseases treated with the same anti-TNF agents with and without concomitant therapies. Methods. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab in both rheumatologic and non-rheumatologic diseases until 2012. Results were calculated as pooled rates and/or pooled odd ratios (OR). Results. Overall, 40 RCTs with a total of 14,683 patients (anti-TNF: 10,010; placebo: 4673) were included. TB reactivation was 0.26% (26/10,010) in the anti-TNF group and 0% (0/4673) in the control group, corresponding to an OR of 24.8 (95% CI 2.4-133). TB risk was higher when anti-TNF agents were combined with methotrexate or azathioprine as compared with either controls (24/4241 versus 0/4673; OR 54; 95% CI 5.3-88) or anti-TNF monotherapy (24/4241 versus 2/5769; OR 13.3; 95% CI 3.7-100). When anti-TNF was used as monotherapy, TB risk tended to be higher than placebo (2/5769 versus 0/4673; OR 4; 95% CI 0.2-15.7). Conclusions. TB risk with anti-TNF agents appeared to be increased when these agents were used in combination with methotrexate or azathioprine as compared with monotherapy regimen. TB risk seemed to be higher than placebo, even when monotherapy is prescribed

Update on the management of inflammatory bowel disease: specific role of adalimumab

Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) medications are a class of biologics employed in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Adalimumab is the first fully human monoclonal immunoglobulin directed against TNF-α, which binds with high affinity and specificity to membrane and soluble TNF. Adalimumab administered subcutaneously has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, and severe chronic psoriasis. Studies have shown that adalimumab is effective for inducing and maintaining remission of moderate-to-severe active Crohn’s disease (CD) patients at an induction dose of 160/80 mg (week 0 and 2) and at a maintenance dose of 40 mg every other week. The efficacy of adalimumab as a second-line therapy has also been documented for patients with loss of response or intolerance to infliximab. Adalimumab is also superior to placebo for inducing and maintaining complete perianal fistula closure. It also seems effective for reducing extraintestinal manifestations. The safety profile is similar to that of other anti-TNF therapy in CD patients, with lower immunogenicity and rate of adverse injection reactions than infliximab. Adalimumab is not approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Recently, however, the results of the first randomized, controlled trial on adalimumab for UC showed that adalimumab at 160/80 mg induction dose was safe and effective for inducing remission and clinical response after 8 weeks in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC failing treatment with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants. More data are necessary to clarify the therapeutic role of adalimumab in UC. This review of the literature summarizes available data on the efficacy and safety profile adalimumab in patients with IBD

JAK inhibitors: an evidence-based choice of the most appropriate molecule

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) represent a fundamental therapeutic tool for the treatment of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Although JAKis are often considered a homogeneous class of drugs whose members are thought to be largely interchangeable, there are significant differences in their efficacy and safety profiles. This narrative review analyzes the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences among JAKIs, highlighting their clinical relevance based on the most recent available evidence. The article aims to provide rheumatologists, gastroenterologists and dermatologists with practical guidance for choosing the most appropriate JAKi for each patient, given the lack of evidence-based recommendations on this topic, to improve clinical outcomes. Due to its preferential action on JAK1, intestinal metabolization and proven absence of impact on male fertility, filgotinib may be characterized by an improved benefit/risk ratio compared with other less selective JAKis

Drug-related pneumonitis in patients receiving Vedolizumab therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Noninfective drug-related pneumonitis (DRP) is a well-known adverse effect of several drugs: clinical manifestations have mostly an acute/subacute onset and vary from mild to life-threatening. Several DRP cases have been described in patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor α, rituximab, and tocilizumab.1,2 To date, only 4 reports of vedolizumab-related pneumonitis have been presented

Therapeutic adherence in inflammatory bowel disease: User guide from a multidisciplinary modified Delphi consensus

Background: Therapeutic non-adherence can significantly impair the quality of life of patients affected by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), leading to worse treatment outcomes, more frequent hospitalizations, and increased healthcare expenses. Identifying and enhancing treatment adherence is a key goal in managing IBD. Aim: To establish a consensus on the definition of therapeutic adherence, determination of risk factors, and identify patients with IBD at higher risk of non-adherence. Methods: A modified Delphi method was employed to develop consensus statements. Initially, an extensive literature review was conducted on therapeutic adherence in patients affected by IBD, leading to the formulation of 13 statements. These statements were assessed and approved after two rounds of voting (level of agreement 1 to 9; cut-off ≥7 for approval). Results: In the first voting round, all 13 statements achieved a mean score of ≥7. During a subsequent plenary session, 12 of the 13 statements reached positive consensus, with final cumulative agreement ranging from 80 % to 100 %. Conclusion: The 12 statements are intended to offer practical guidance to enhance therapeutic adherence in patients with IBD. Patients’ profiles at higher risk of non-adherence need prompt recognition and implementation of appropriate strategies by dedicated physicians