335 research outputs found

    Ergodic Transformations of the Space of pp-adic Integers

    Full text link
    Let L1\mathcal L_1 be the set of all mappings f ⁣:ZpZpf\colon\Z_p\Z_p of the space of all pp-adic integers Zp\Z_p into itself that satisfy Lipschitz condition with a constant 1. We prove that the mapping fL1f\in\mathcal L_1 is ergodic with respect to the normalized Haar measure on Zp\Z_p if and only if ff induces a single cycle permutation on each residue ring Z/pkZ\Z/p^k\Z modulo pkp^k, for all k=1,2,3,...k=1,2,3,.... The multivariate case, as well as measure-preserving mappings, are considered also. Results of the paper in a combination with earlier results of the author give explicit description of ergodic mappings from L1\mathcal L_1. This characterization is complete for p=2p=2. As an application we obtain a characterization of polynomials (and certain locally analytic functions) that induce ergodic transformations of pp-adic spheres. The latter result implies a solution of a problem (posed by A.~Khrennikov) about the ergodicity of a perturbed monomial mapping on a sphere.Comment: To be published in Proceedings of the 2-nd Int'l Conference on p-adic Mathematical Physics (15-25 Sept., 2005, Belgrade

    Automata finiteness criterion in terms of van der Put series of automata functions

    Full text link
    In the paper we develop the pp-adic theory of discrete automata. Every automaton A\mathfrak A (transducer) whose input/output alphabets consist of pp symbols can be associated to a continuous (in fact, 1-Lipschitz) map from pp-adic integers to pp integers, the automaton function fAf_\mathfrak A. The pp-adic theory (in particular, the pp-adic ergodic theory) turned out to be very efficient in a study of properties of automata expressed via properties of automata functions. In the paper we prove a criterion for finiteness of the number of states of automaton in terms of van der Put series of the automaton function. The criterion displays connections between pp-adic analysis and the theory of automata sequences

    The Non-Archimedean Theory of Discrete Systems

    Full text link
    In the paper, we study behavior of discrete dynamical systems (automata) w.r.t. transitivity; that is, speaking loosely, we consider how diverse may be behavior of the system w.r.t. variety of word transformations performed by the system: We call a system completely transitive if, given arbitrary pair a,ba,b of finite words that have equal lengths, the system A\mathfrak A, while evolution during (discrete) time, at a certain moment transforms aa into bb. To every system A\mathfrak A, we put into a correspondence a family FA\mathcal F_{\mathfrak A} of continuous maps of a suitable non-Archimedean metric space and show that the system is completely transitive if and only if the family FA\mathcal F_{\mathfrak A} is ergodic w.r.t. the Haar measure; then we find easy-to-verify conditions the system must satisfy to be completely transitive. The theory can be applied to analyze behavior of straight-line computer programs (in particular, pseudo-random number generators that are used in cryptography and simulations) since basic CPU instructions (both numerical and logical) can be considered as continuous maps of a (non-Archimedean) metric space Z2\mathbb Z_2 of 2-adic integers.Comment: The extended version of the talk given at MACIS-201

    Ergodicity criteria for non-expanding transformations of 2-adic spheres

    Full text link
    In the paper, we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for ergodicity (with respect to the normalized Haar measure) of discrete dynamical systems on 2-adic spheres S2r(a)\mathbf S_{2^{-r}}(a) of radius 2r2^{-r}, r1r\ge 1, centered at some point aa from the ultrametric space of 2-adic integers Z2\mathbb Z_2. The map f ⁣:Z2Z2f\colon\mathbb Z_2\to\mathbb Z_2 is assumed to be non-expanding and measure-preserving; that is, ff satisfies a Lipschitz condition with a constant 1 with respect to the 2-adic metric, and ff preserves a natural probability measure on Z2\mathbb Z_2, the Haar measure μ2\mu_2 on Z2\mathbb Z_2 which is normalized so that μ2(Z2)=1\mu_2(\mathbb Z_2)=1
    corecore