Ultrastructure and 28S rDNA Phylogeny of Two Gregarines: Cephaloidophora cf. communis and Heliospora cf. longissima with Remarks on Gregarine Morphology and Phylogenetic Analysis

18S rRNA gene sequences (SSU rDNA) in gregarines are problematic for phylogenetic analysis, mainly due to artifacts related to long branch attraction (LBA). In this study, we sequenced 18S rRNA (SSU rRNA), 5.8S rRNA, and 28S rRNA (LSU rRNA) genes of two gregarine species from crustacean hosts (gregarine superfamily Cephaloidophoroidea): Cephaloidophora cf. communis from a marine cirripedian Balanus balanus (White Sea), and Heliospora cf. longissima from the freshwater amphipods, Eulimnogammarus verrucosus and E. vittatus (Lake Baikal). Phylogenetic analyses of SSU rDNA sequences failed to produce a robust tree topology, for a limited taxon sample (31 operational taxonomic units (OTU), based on 1,604 sites), while LSU (2,869 sites), and concatenated dataset based on SSU, 5.8S, and LSU (4,627 sites) produced more consistent tree topologies for the same taxon sample. Analyses testing for LBA-influence were negative, therefore we suggested that the main reason of the failed topologies in SSU rDNA analyses is insufficient data (insufficient taxon sampling and limited molecular data), rather than LBA. Possible advantages of Bayesian analyses, compared to Maximum Likelihood, and usage of LSU rDNA within the context of apicomplexan phylogenetics were discussed. One of the advantages of LSU is likely its lower rate of evolution in long-branching apicomplexans (e.g., gregarines), relative to other (non-long-branching) apicomplexans, compared to SSU rDNA. Ultrastructure of the epicytic folds was studied. There are 3 to 5 apical arcs (also known as rippled dense structures) and 2 to 5 apical filaments in the tops of the folds. This small number of the apical structures fits into morphological diversity of the epicyte in other Cephaloidophoroidea, but this is not a synapomorphy of the group because this was also detected in several unrelated gregarines. C. cf. communis was found to contain a septum between the epimerite and the protomerite, which has not been reported in other gregarines. More exact terminology, which takes into account number of body sections and septa, is proposed for morphological descriptions of trophozoites and free mature gamonts of gregarines. In accordance with this, C. cf. communis gamonts are tricystid and biseptate, whereas H. cf. longissima gamonts are tricystid and uniseptate, similar to other eugregarines

Protococcidian Eleutheroschizon duboscqi, an Unusual Apicomplexan Interconnecting Gregarines and Cryptosporidia.

This study focused on the attachment strategy, cell structure and the host-parasite interactions of the protococcidian Eleutheroschizon duboscqi, parasitising the polychaete Scoloplos armiger. The attached trophozoites and gamonts of E. duboscqi were detected at different development stages. The parasite develops epicellularly, covered by a host cell-derived, two-membrane parasitophorous sac forming a caudal tipped appendage. Staining with Evans blue suggests that this tail is protein-rich, supported by the presence of a fibrous substance in this area. Despite the ultrastructural evidence for long filaments in the tail, it stained only weakly for F-actin, while spectrin seemed to accumulate in this area. The attachment apparatus consists of lobes arranged in one (trophozoites) or two (gamonts) circles, crowned by a ring of filamentous fascicles. During trophozoite maturation, the internal space between the parasitophorous sac and parasite turns translucent, the parasite trilaminar pellicle seems to reorganise and is covered by a dense fibrous glycocalyx. The parasite surface is organised in broad folds with grooves in between. Micropores are situated at the bottom of the grooves. A layer of filaments organised in bands, underlying the folds and ending above the attachment fascicles, was detected just beneath the pellicle. Confocal microscopy, along with the application of cytoskeletal drugs (jasplakinolide, cytochalasin D, oryzalin) confirmed the presence of actin and tubulin polymerised forms in both the parasitophorous sac and the parasite, while myosin labelling was restricted to the sac. Despite positive tubulin labelling, no microtubules were detected in mature stages. The attachment strategy of E. duboscqi shares features with that of cryptosporidia and gregarines, i.e. the parasite itself conspicuously resembles an epicellularly located gregarine, while the parasitophorous sac develops in a similar manner to that in cryptosporidia. This study provides a re-evaluation of epicellular development in other apicomplexans and directly compares their niche with that of E. duboscqi

Motility in blastogregarines (Apicomplexa): Native and drug-induced organisation of Siedleckia nematoides cytoskeletal elements.

Recent studies on motility of Apicomplexa concur with the so-called glideosome concept applied for apicomplexan zoites, describing a unique mechanism of substrate-dependent gliding motility facilitated by a conserved form of actomyosin motor and subpellicular microtubules. In contrast, the gregarines and blastogregarines exhibit different modes and mechanisms of motility, correlating with diverse modifications of their cortex. This study focuses on the motility and cytoskeleton of the blastogregarine Siedleckia nematoides Caullery et Mesnil, 1898 parasitising the polychaete Scoloplos cf. armiger (Müller, 1776). The blastogregarine moves independently on a solid substrate without any signs of gliding motility; the motility in a liquid environment (in both the attached and detached forms) rather resembles a sequence of pendular, twisting, undulation, and sometimes spasmodic movements. Despite the presence of key glideosome components such as pellicle consisting of the plasma membrane and the inner membrane complex, actin, myosin, subpellicular microtubules, micronemes and glycocalyx layer, the motility mechanism of S. nematoides differs from the glideosome machinery. Nevertheless, experimental assays using cytoskeletal probes proved that the polymerised forms of actin and tubulin play an essential role in the S. nematoides movement. Similar to Selenidium archigregarines, the subpellicular microtubules organised in several layers seem to be the leading motor structures in blastogregarine motility. The majority of the detected actin was stabilised in a polymerised form and appeared to be located beneath the inner membrane complex. The experimental data suggest the subpellicular microtubules to be associated with filamentous structures (= cross-linking protein complexes), presumably of actin nature

A new view on the morphology and phylogeny of eugregarines suggested by the evidence from the gregarine Ancora sagittata (Leuckart, 1860) Labbé, 1899 (Apicomplexa: Eugregarinida)

International audienceBackground: Gregarines are a group of early branching Apicomplexa parasitizing invertebrate animals. Despite their wide distribution and relevance to the understanding the phylogenesis of apicomplexans, gregarines remain understudied: light microscopy data are insufficient for classification, and electron microscopy and molecular data are fragmentary and overlap only partially.Methods Scanning and transmission electron microscopy, PCR, DNA cloning and sequencing (Sanger and NGS), molecular phylogenetic analyses using ribosomal RNA genes (18S (SSU), 5.8S, and 28S (LSU) ribosomal DNAs (rDNAs)).Results and Discussion: We present the results of an ultrastructural and molecular phylogenetic study on the marine gregarine Ancora sagittata from the polychaete Capitella capitata followed by evolutionary and taxonomic synthesis of the morphological and molecular phylogenetic evidence on eugregarines. The ultrastructure of Ancora sagittata generally corresponds to that of other eugregarines, but reveals some differences in epicytic folds (crests) and attachment apparatus to gregarines in the family Lecudinidae, where Ancora sagittata has been classified. Molecular phylogenetic trees based on SSU (18S) rDNA reveal several robust clades (superfamilies) of eugregarines, including Ancoroidea superfam. nov., which comprises two families (Ancoridae fam. nov. and Polyplicariidae) and branches separately from the Lecudinidae; thus, all representatives of Ancoroidea are here officially removed from the Lecudinidae. Analysis of sequence data also points to possible cryptic species within Ancora sagittata and the inclusion of numerous environmental sequences from anoxic habitats within the Ancoroidea. LSU (28S) rDNA phylogenies, unlike the analysis of SSU rDNA alone, recover a well-supported monophyly of the gregarines involved (eugregarines), although this conclusion is currently limited by sparse taxon sampling and the presence of fast-evolving sequences in some species. Comparative morphological analyses of gregarine teguments and attachment organelles lead us to revise their terminology. The terms “longitudinal folds” and “mucron” are restricted to archigregarines, whereas the terms “epicystic crests” and “epimerite” are proposed to describe the candidate synapomorphies of eugregarines, which, consequently, are considered as a monophyletic group. Abolishing the suborders Aseptata and Septata, incorporating neogregarines into the Eugregarinida, and treating the major molecular phylogenetic lineages of eugregarines as superfamilies appear as the best way of reconciling recent morphological and molecular evidence. Accordingly, the diagnosis of the order Eugregarinida Léger, 1900 is updated

Fine structure of <i>Eleutheroschizon duboscqi</i> mature trophozoites.

<p><b>A.</b> Mature trophozoite transforming into a gamont stage. TEM. <b>B.</b> Detailed view of the annular joint point and a well-developed fascicle of filaments. TEM. <b>C.</b> The view of mitochondria and a micropore (white circle) at the attachment site. The inset shows the micropore in detail. TEM. <b>D.</b> Higher magnification of the caudal region. TEM <b>E.</b> Two partially detached, mature trophozoites. SEM. <b>F.</b> The attachment site of a partially detached, mature trophozoite with well-developed fascicles and short filaments. SEM. <b>G.</b> Diagonal section of the apical part of a mature trophozoite. TEM. <b>H-I.</b> Craters left after detachment of mature trophozoites with well-developed attachment fascicles. Flat holes organised in one circle correspond to the developing lobes. SEM. <b>J.</b> A crater left after a trophozoite of more advanced stage as indicated by the presence of one circle of deep holes corresponding to well-developed lobes and one extra lobe starting the formation of a second circle. SEM. <i>a—</i>parasite amylopectin, <i>black arrow</i>—PS, <i>black arrowhead—</i>parasite plasma membrane, <i>black asterisk</i>—space between the parasite and PS, <i>black double/paired arrowheads</i>—parasite cytomembranes, <i>c</i>—parasite cytoplasm, <i>er</i>—parasite endoplasmic reticulum, <i>fa</i>—attachment fascicles, <i>fh—</i>holes in the host tissue left after the fascicles of the detached parasite, <i>fi—</i>short attachment filaments, <i>g</i>—glycocalyx, <i>h—</i>host cell, <i>l</i>—attachment lobe, <i>lh</i>—holes in the host tissue left after the lobes of the detached parasite, <i>m</i>—parasite mitochondria, <i>mv</i>—host microvilli, <i>n—</i>parasite nucleus, <i>p</i>—parasite, <i>sf—</i>parasite subpellicular filaments, <i>white arrow</i>—host cell plasma membrane, <i>white arrowhead</i>—dense band, <i>white asterisk</i>—empty attachment site, <i>white double arrowhead</i>—base of the PS.</p