Echocardiographic-fluoroscopic fusion imaging for transcatheter mitral valve repair guidance

The echocardiographic-fluoroscopic fusion imaging is a new imaging system which has recently become available, with the proposal to facilitate catheters and device navigation during catheter-based structural heart disease interventions. Several reports have described the early developments and the first clinical experiences, but literature focusing on the practical applications of fusion imaging technology to mitral valve transcatheter interventions, and on its potential advantages and current limitations, is still limited. In this review, we, therefore, describe the role of this novel imaging system during Mitraclip, Cardioband, and paravalvular leak closure interventions. The technical principles and the fluoroscopic anatomy of the interatrial septum and mitral valve are also described

Incidence, predictors and cerebrovascular consequences of leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES We examined the incidence, the impact of subsequent cerebrovascular events and the clinical or procedural predictors of leaflet thrombosis (LT) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS MEDLINE/PubMed was systematically screened for studies reporting on LT in TAVI patients. Incidence [both clinical and subclinical, i.e. detected with computed tomography (CT)] of LT was the primary end point of the study. Predictors of LT evaluated at multivariable analysis and impact of LT on stroke were the secondary ones. RESULTS Eighteen studies encompassing 11 124 patients evaluating incidence of LT were included. Pooled incidence of LT was 0.43% per month [5.16% per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.72, I2 = 98%]. Pooled incidence of subclinical LT was 1.36% per month (16.32% per year, 95% CI 0.71-2.19, I2 = 94%). Clinical LT was less frequent (0.04% per month, 0.48% per year, 95% CI 0.00-0.19, I2 = 93%). LT increased the risk of stroke [odds ratio (OR) 4.21, 95% CI 1.27-13.98], and was more frequent in patients with a valve diameter of 28-mm (OR 2.89: 1.55-5.8), for balloon-expandable (OR 8: 2.1-9.7) or after valve-in-valve procedures (OR 17.1: 3.1-84.9). Oral anticoagulation therapy reduced the risk of LT (OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.22-0.84, I2 = 64%), as well as the mean transvalvular gradient. CONCLUSIONS LT represents an infrequent event after TAVI, despite increasing risk of stroke. Given its full reversal with warfarin, in high-risk patients (those with valve-in-valve procedures, balloon expandable or large-sized devices), a protocol which includes a control CT appears reasonable

Incidence, predictors and cerebrovascular consequences of leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract OBJECTIVES We examined the incidence, the impact of subsequent cerebrovascular events and the clinical or procedural predictors of leaflet thrombosis (LT) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS MEDLINE/PubMed was systematically screened for studies reporting on LT in TAVI patients. Incidence [both clinical and subclinical, i.e. detected with computed tomography (CT)] of LT was the primary end point of the study. Predictors of LT evaluated at multivariable analysis and impact of LT on stroke were the secondary ones. RESULTS Eighteen studies encompassing 11 124 patients evaluating incidence of LT were included. Pooled incidence of LT was 0.43% per month [5.16% per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21–0.72, I2 = 98%]. Pooled incidence of subclinical LT was 1.36% per month (16.32% per year, 95% CI 0.71–2.19, I2 = 94%). Clinical LT was less frequent (0.04% per month, 0.48% per year, 95% CI 0.00–0.19, I2 = 93%). LT increased the risk of stroke [odds ratio (OR) 4.21, 95% CI 1.27–13.98], and was more frequent in patients with a valve diameter of 28-mm (OR 2.89: 1.55–5.8), for balloon-expandable (OR 8: 2.1–9.7) or after valve-in-valve procedures (OR 17.1: 3.1–84.9). Oral anticoagulation therapy reduced the risk of LT (OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.22–0.84, I2 = 64%), as well as the mean transvalvular gradient. CONCLUSIONS LT represents an infrequent event after TAVI, despite increasing risk of stroke. Given its full reversal with warfarin, in high-risk patients (those with valve-in-valve procedures, balloon expandable or large-sized devices), a protocol which includes a control CT appears reasonable. </jats:sec

Infective Endocarditis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Infective endocarditis may affect patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The purpose of this study was to provide detailed information on incidence rates, types of microorganisms, and outcomes of infective endocarditis after TAVR

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Pure Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation

Background Limited data exist about safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with pure native aortic regurgitation (AR). Objectives This study sought to compare the outcomes of TAVR with early- and new-generation devices in symptomatic patients with pure native AR. Methods From the pure native AR TAVR multicenter registry, procedural and clinical outcomes were assessed according to VARC-2 criteria and compared between early- and new-generation devices. Results A total of 331 patients with a mean STS score of 6.7 ± 6.7 underwent TAVR. The early- and new-generation devices were used in 119 patients (36.0%) and 212 patients (64.0%), respectively. STS score tended to be lower in the new-generation device group (6.2 ± 6.7 vs. 7.6 ± 6.7; p = 0.08), but transfemoral access was more frequently used in the early-generation device group (87.4% vs. 60.8%; p < 0.001). Compared with the early-generation devices, the new-generation devices were associated with a significantly higher device success rate (81.1% vs. 61.3%; p < 0.001) due to lower rates of second valve implantation (12.7% vs. 24.4%; p = 0.007) and post-procedural AR â\u89¥ moderate (4.2% vs. 18.8%; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in major 30-day endpoints between the 2 groups. The cumulative rates of all-cause and cardiovascular death at 1-year follow-up were 24.1% and 15.6%, respectively. The 1-year all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in the patients with post-procedural AR â\u89¥ moderate compared with those with post-procedural AR â\u89¤ mild (46.1% vs. 21.8%; log-rank p = 0.001). On multivariable analysis, post-procedural AR â\u89¥ moderate was independently associated with 1-year all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 2.85; 95% confidence interval: 1.52 to 5.35; p = 0.001). Conclusions Compared with the early-generation devices, TAVR using the new-generation devices was associated with improved procedural outcomes in treating patients with pure native AR. In patients with pure native AR, significant post-procedural AR was independently associated with increased mortality

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with Balloon- Versus Self-Expandable Bioprostheses for the Treatment of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis

BACKGROUND: Differences between balloon- and self-expandable transcatheter heart valves (BE-THVs and SE-THVs, respectively) may influence the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with BE-THV or SE-THV for computed tomography-diagnosed bicuspid aortic valve stenosis at 29 centers were included. The primary outcome was death or stroke. After propensity score matching in 10 data sets generated by multiple imputation, outcomes from transcatheter aortic valve replacement to 3-year follow-up were computed by multivariable binomial logistic mixed-effects models, multivariable linear mixed-effects models, or multivariable frailty models accounting for center-related influences and residual confounding effects (doubly robust adjustment). The results were replicated by inverse probability of treatment weighting and multivariable adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 1443 consecutive patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis undergoing BE-THV (n=860) or SE-THV (n=583) implantation were included. In-hospital and 30-day death or stroke did not significantly differ between BE-THV and SE-THV groups (5.1% versus 6.1%; hazard ratio after propensity score matching, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.51-2.02]). BE-THV implantation was associated with higher annulus rupture and mean transvalvular gradient compared with SE-THV implantation. In contrast, SE-THV implantation was associated with higher additional valve implantation and paravalvular regurgitation compared with BE-THV implantation. The results were consistent across the statistical methods used and between early- and new-generation THVs. At 30 days, pacemaker implantation was lower in the BE-THV group compared with the SE-THV group (11.9% versus 18.6%; hazard ratio after propensity score matching, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.36-0.93]). This result did not depend on the statistical method used. At 3 years, consistent with the 1- and 2-year analyses, death or stroke was not significantly different between the BE-THV and SE-THV groups (23.7% versus 26.2%; hazard ratio after propensity score matching, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.65-1.51]). Death or stroke across major clinical, anatomical, functional, and procedural conditions was consistent with the main analysis. After inverse probability of treatment weighting and multivariable adjustment, these conclusions remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis, death or stroke does not significantly differ between those receiving a BE-THV and those receiving an SE-THV over a follow-up of 3 years. BE-THV is associated with higher transvalvular mean gradient and more frequent annulus rupture, whereas SE-THV is associated with more frequent moderate to severe aortic regurgitation, additional THV implantation, and permanent pacemaker implantation.</p