Acute right heart failure in a patient with right heart thrombus and pulmonary thromboembolism

Right Heart Thrombus (RiHT) management is really controversial, and appropriate guidelines are not present for the management. In patients referring with RiHT and Pulmonary Embolism (PE), there are three ways of managing these patients. Out of the three one is thrombectomy which is with high risk taking in mind the comorbidities these patients have. The other is using thrombolytic which, in many cases is contraindicated or with high risk. The other less effective way is full anticoagulation. It is really controversial to choose between these ways of management and no clear approach is present. The case presented is a 44-year-old morbid obese male with history of dyspnea on exertion (functional Class II) and foot oedema or the last three months, who was transferred to the emergency department with respiratory distress and hypoxia. Echocardiography was done for the patient which showed moderate Right Ventricular (RV) dysfunction with severe RV enlargement and a severe Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) with TR gradient of 70mmHg. He also had a semi-mobile large pedunculated mass in favour of a clot in his RV cavity. With the impression of PE heparin was administered to the patient and he was admitted in the coronary care unit. Pulmonary Computed Tomography (CT) angiography showed sub-segmental Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy (PTE) in the left lung. He had negative cardiac markers and stable vital signs and so full anticoagulation was chosen for his treatment. His clinical course was uneventful and after 10 days of treatment the RV size and function improved significantly. On follow-up after a month he was doing well. Although recent Guidelines of European Society of Cardiology in management of acute PE stated that RiHT, particularly mobile, are associated with a significantly increased early mortality risk in patients with acute PE. Immediate therapy is mandatory, but optimal treatment is controversial in the absence of controlled trials. Thrombolysis and embolectomy are probably both effective while anticoagulation alone seems to be less effective. � 2016, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. All rights reserved

Acute type A aortic dissection missed as acute coronary syndrome

Although the aortic dissection is not common, its outcome is frequently fatal, and many patients with aortic dissection die before referral to the hospital or any diagnostic testing. The symptoms of aortic dissection can be similar to myocardial ischemia. A 66-year-old male referred to our hospital with suspicion of aortic dissection after echocardiography while evaluating for his high blood pressure. He had symptoms of acute coronary syndrome two years before and had done coronary angiography. On presentation to our hospital he had a high blood pressure. On reviewing his past medical history and examining, in the film of coronary angiography, the dissection flap in ascending aorta was identified. Although type A aortic dissection is a catastrophic condition with high mortality and requires prompt surgical treatment but in some cases it may be misdiagnosed as acute coronary syndrome. Sometimes against its high mortality when left untreated, patients survive and are diagnosed later in life incidentally. So it is of great importance to have great clinical suspicion for aortic dissection in patients referring to the hospital with chest pain and the predisposing factors. © 2016, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. All rights reserved

De novo myasthenia gravis in a patient with malignant melanoma after concurrent SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy:Case report and literature review

In recent years, the advent and increasingly common use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer treatment have been notable. While ICIs have shown relatively better toxicity profiles compared to traditional chemotherapy agents, they are linked to a unique range of toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), stemming from immune system dysregulation. Following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, cancer patients were universally categorized as the highest priority subgroup for vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), despite being excluded from vaccine trials. The exclusion of cancer patients from vaccine trials has raised concerns within the scientific community about the potential for a hyperactive autoimmune response, which could lead to severe irAEs in patients receiving concurrent ICIs and anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Retrospective studies have indicated subtle safety concerns for mRNA vaccines in cancer patients who have undergone ICI treatment, with none of these studies encompassing inactivated anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Here, we present a case of a patient with malignant melanoma who developed fatal myasthenia gravis (MG) following concurrent vaccination with Sinopharm's inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (BBIBP-CorV) and initiation of pembrolizumab. Additionally, we examine current research on the relationship between anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and irAEs in patients treated with ICIs and propose a potential mechanism responsible for the fatal MG in our patient.</p

Long-term outcome of patients with transposition of the great arteries and a systemic right ventricle:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Patients with a transposition of the great arteries (TGA) and a systemic right ventricle are at risk of heart failure (HF) development, arrhythmia and early mortality. Prognostic evaluations in clinical studies are hampered by small sample sizes and single-centred approaches. We aimed to investigate yearly rate of outcome and factors affecting it.METHODS: A systematic literature search of four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus) was conducted from inception to June 2022. Studies reporting the association of a systemic right ventricle with mortality with a minimal follow-up of 2 years during adulthood were selected. Incidence of HF hospitalization and/or arrhythmia were captured as additional endpoints. For each outcome, a summary effect estimate was calculated.RESULTS: From a total of 3891 identified records, 56 studies met the selection criteria. These studies described the follow-up (on average 7.27 years) of 5358 systemic right ventricle patients. The mortality incidence was 1.3 (1-1.7) per 100 patients/year. The incidence of HF hospitalization was 2.6 (1.9-3.7) per 100 patients/year. Predictors of poor outcome were a lower left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) (standardized mean differences (SMD) of -0.43 (-0.77 to -0.09) and - 0.85 (-1.35 to -0.35), respectively), higher plasma concentrations of NT-proBNP (SMD of 1.24 (0.49-1.99)), and NYHA class ≥2 (risk ratio of 2.17 (1.40-3.35)).CONCLUSIONS: TGA patients with a systemic right ventricle have increased incidence of mortality and HF hospitalization. A lower LVEF and RVEF, higher levels of NT-proBNP and NYHA class ≥2 are associated with poor outcome.</p

Long-term outcome of patients with transposition of the great arteries and a systemic right ventricle:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Patients with a transposition of the great arteries (TGA) and a systemic right ventricle are at risk of heart failure (HF) development, arrhythmia and early mortality. Prognostic evaluations in clinical studies are hampered by small sample sizes and single-centred approaches. We aimed to investigate yearly rate of outcome and factors affecting it.METHODS: A systematic literature search of four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus) was conducted from inception to June 2022. Studies reporting the association of a systemic right ventricle with mortality with a minimal follow-up of 2 years during adulthood were selected. Incidence of HF hospitalization and/or arrhythmia were captured as additional endpoints. For each outcome, a summary effect estimate was calculated.RESULTS: From a total of 3891 identified records, 56 studies met the selection criteria. These studies described the follow-up (on average 7.27 years) of 5358 systemic right ventricle patients. The mortality incidence was 1.3 (1-1.7) per 100 patients/year. The incidence of HF hospitalization was 2.6 (1.9-3.7) per 100 patients/year. Predictors of poor outcome were a lower left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) (standardized mean differences (SMD) of -0.43 (-0.77 to -0.09) and - 0.85 (-1.35 to -0.35), respectively), higher plasma concentrations of NT-proBNP (SMD of 1.24 (0.49-1.99)), and NYHA class ≥2 (risk ratio of 2.17 (1.40-3.35)).CONCLUSIONS: TGA patients with a systemic right ventricle have increased incidence of mortality and HF hospitalization. A lower LVEF and RVEF, higher levels of NT-proBNP and NYHA class ≥2 are associated with poor outcome.</p

Acute myocardial infarction following blunt chest trauma and coronary artery dissection

Blunt chest traumatic coronary artery dissection is an uncommon cause of atherosclerotic and non-atherosclerotic Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI). Injuries of the coronary artery after blunt chest trauma are caused by different mechanisms such as vascular spasm, dissection and intimal tear or rupture of an existing thrombus formation. Chest pain might be masked by other injuries in patients with multiple traumas in car accident. Present case report is on a 37-year-old male without any specific past medical history who reported to the emergency department of a hospital with chest discomfort and was discharged with the impression of chest wall pain. After three days he experienced severe chest pain and he was admitted with the impression of acute coronary syndrome and underwent coronary angiography which showed Left Anterior Descending (LAD) artery dissection. The possibility of injury of the coronary artery should be kept in mind after blunt trauma to the chest. This condition is sometimes underdiagnosed. Its diagnosis may be difficult because chest pain can be interpreted as being secondary to chest wall contusion or it may be overshadowed by other injuries. Coronary dissection diagnosis after chest trauma requires clinical suspicion and systematic evaluation. Electrocardiography (ECG) should be done for every patient with thoracic trauma as the clinical findings may be misleading. © 2016, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. All rights reserved