High frequency of ulcers, not associated with Helicobacter pylori, in the stomach in the first year after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Although gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are very frequent in organ transplant patients, there is a paucity of data about the endoscopic findings of kidney recipients. METHODS: Two thousand one hundred and thirty-five kidney transplants were performed between 1994 and 2007. During that period, 672 gastroscopies were performed in 543 of those patients. Their mean age was 49.5 years and 56.9% were male. Immunosuppressive combinations included cyclosporine-mycophenolate-steroids, cyclosporine-steroids and tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil-steroids. Ninety-eight percent of the patients received acid suppression therapy. RESULTS: The rate of clinically significant endoscopic findings was 84%. Macroscopic findings included inflammation in 46.7%, oesophagitis in 24.7%, ulcer in 16.9% and erosions in 14.8% of cases. Twenty-nine percent of endoscopies showed ulcer disease more frequently in the first 3 months (P=0.0014) after transplantation than later, and 45.7% of all ulcers developed in the first year. The presence of Helicobacter pylori was verified in 20.9% of cases, less than in the general, and also in the uraemic population (P<0.0001). There was no association between the presence of H. pylori and ulcers (P=0.28). Steroid pulse treatment for rejection was not associated with more ulcers (P=0.11); the use of mycophenolate mofetil increased the risk of erosions by 1.8-fold. CONCLUSION: More than 25% of all kidney recipients required upper endoscopy in their 'post-transplant life'; the prevalence of 'positive findings' and ulcer disease was higher than in the general population (P<0.0001). The most vulnerable period is the first 3 months. Mycophenolate mofetil had an impact on GI complications, whilst the presence of H. pylori in the transplant population is not associated with the presence of ulcers

Magnesium lactate in the treatment of Gitelman syndrome: patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Gitelman syndrome (GS) is a rare recessively inherited renal tubulopathy associated with renal potassium (K) and magnesium (Mg) loss. It requires lifelong K and Mg supplementation at high doses that are at best unpalatable and at worst, intolerable. In particular, gastrointestinal side effects often limit full therapeutic usage. METHODS: We report here the analysis of a cohort of 28 adult patients with genetically proven GS who attend our specialist tubular disorders clinic, in whom we initiated the use of a modified-release Mg preparation (slow-release Mg lactate) and who were surveyed by questionnaire. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (89%) preferred the new treatment regimen. Of these 25, 17 (68%) regarded their symptom burden as improved and seven reported no worsening. Of the 25 who were not Mg-treatment naïve, 13 (59%) patients reported fewer side effects, 7 (32%) described them as the same and only 2 (9%) considered side effects to be worse. Five were able to increase their dose without ill-effect. Overall, biochemistry improved in 91% of the 23 patients switched from therapy with other preparations who chose to continue the modified-release Mg preparation. Eleven (48%) improved both their Mg and K mean levels, 3 (13%) improved Mg levels only and in 7 cases (30%), K levels alone rose. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported and biochemical outcomes using modified-release Mg supplements were very favourable, and patient choice should play a large part in choosing Mg supplements with GS patients.This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, and contains data that were presented in abstract form at ASN Kidney week 2014.This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Oxford University Press via https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfw01

Efficacy of early biopsy in kidney allograft recipients with delayed graft function.

t is accepted that kidney transplants that display delayed graft function (DGF) show poorer survival and function, particularly when an acute rejection episode (ARE) occurs. A diagnostic biopsy to establish the reason for DGF, or acknowledge an ARE, even if borderline, can improve short- and long-term graft survivals. From January 2002 to September 2006 we retrospectively evaluated 358 kidney transplant recipients. We performed a biopsy to evaluate the cause of DGF in all patients who required dialysis, or had serum creatinine levels that increased, remained unchanged, or decreased less than 10% per day on three consecutive days during the first week after transplantation. An ARE was found in 18.8% (n = 19) of the biopsies. Early biopsy for patients with DGF is a safe method that allows uncovering of an ARE that would otherwise be undetected. The immediate recognition and treatment of rejection episodes can certainly increase long-term survival and function of renal transplants

Polar nephrectomy in a transplanted kidney: a case report.

After renal transplantation, infarction of the lower pole may be observed. We report an unusual case of lower pole infarction and perforation of the lower calyx due to thrombosis of a lower polar artery. This was managed successfully with partial nephrectomy (nephron-sparing surgery)

SARS-CoV-2 in kidney transplant and waitlisted patients during the first peak: the Welsh experience

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) global pandemic has led to many health care services, including transplantation, being temporarily suspended. For transplantation to safely recommence, there is a need to understand the effects of SARS-CoV-2 in transplant and waitlist patients. We identified 21 patients with proven SARS-CoV-2 infection (13 transplant; 8 waitlist) during the first peak of coronavirus disease 2019 in Wales. Median patient age was 57 years (range, 24-69), 62% were male, and all were white. Median body mass index was 29 kg/m2 (range, 22-42), and 81% had 1 or more significant comorbidities. Median time from transplant to SARS-CoV-2 infection was 135 months (range, 9-356) and median time since being listed was 17.5 months (range, 5-69) for waitlisted patients. Seventeen patients were admitted to the hospital (81%), 18% (n = 3) in intensive care unit, and 5 patients died (4 transplant recipients and 1 waitlist patient; 24%). Two of the 4 transplant patients who died had recent malignancy. Although the mortality of hospitalized transplant patients was high, their infection rate of 0.87% meant that the overall mortality of transplant patients due to SARS-CoV-2 was low and comparable to that of patients on the waitlist. These data provide confidence in restarting the transplant program, provided that a series of measures aiming to avoid infections in newly transplanted patients are taken