Impact of intracoronary bone marrow cell therapy on left ventricular function in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a collaborative meta-analysis

Aims The objective of the present analysis was to systematically examine the effect of intracoronary bone marrow cell (BMC) therapy on left ventricular (LV) function after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in various subgroups of patients by performing a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Methods and results We identified all randomized controlled trials comparing intracoronary BMC infusion as treatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. We contacted the principal investigator for each participating trial to provide summary data with regard to different pre-specified subgroups [age, diabetes mellitus, time from symptoms to percutaneous coronary intervention, infarct-related artery, LV end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), LV ejection fraction (EF), infarct size, presence of microvascular obstruction, timing of cell infusion, and injected cell number] and three different endpoints [change in LVEF, LVEDVI, and LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI)]. Data from 16 studies were combined including 1641 patients (984 cell therapy, 657 controls). The absolute improvement in LVEF was greater among BMC-treated patients compared with controls: [2.55% increase, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.83-3.26, P < 0.001]. Cell therapy significantly reduced LVEDVI and LVESVI (−3.17 mL/m², 95% CI: −4.86 to −1.47, P < 0.001; −2.60 mL/m², 95% CI −3.84 to −1.35, P < 0.001, respectively). Treatment benefit in terms of LVEF improvement was more pronounced in younger patients (age <55, 3.38%, 95% CI: 2.36-4.39) compared with older patients (age ≥55 years, 1.77%, 95% CI: 0.80-2.74, P = 0.03). This heterogeneity in treatment effect was also observed with respect to the reduction in LVEDVI and LVESVI. Moreover, patients with baseline LVEF <40% derived more benefit from intracoronary BMC therapy. LVEF improvement was 5.30%, 95% CI: 4.27-6.33 in patients with LVEF <40% compared with 1.45%, 95% CI: 0.60 to 2.31 in LVEF ≥40%, P < 0.001. No clear interaction was observed between other subgroups and outcomes. Conclusion Intracoronary BMC infusion is associated with improvement of LV function and remodelling in patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Younger patients and patients with a more severely depressed LVEF at baseline derived most benefit from this adjunctive therap

Sex Differences in Arrhythmic Burden with the Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

Background: Data on the arrhythmic burden of women at risk for sudden cardiac death are limited, especially in patients using the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD). Objective: We aimed to characterize WCD compliance, atrial and ventricular arrhythmic burden, and WCD outcomes by sex in patients enrolled in the Prospective Registry of Patients Using the Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator (WEARIT-II U.S. Registry). Methods: In the WEARIT-II Registry, we stratified 2000 patients by sex into women (n = 598) and men (n = 1402). WCD wear time, ventricular and atrial arrhythmic events during WCD use, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation rates at the end of WCD use were evaluated. Results: The mean WCD wear time was similar in women and men (94 days vs 90 days; P = .145), with longer daily use in women (21.4 h/d vs 20.7 h/d; P = .001). Burden of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation was higher in women, with 30 events per 100 patient-years compared with 18 events per 100 patient-years in men (P = .017), with similar findings for treated and non-treated ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. Recurrent atrial arrhythmias/sustained ventricular tachycardia was also more frequent in women than in men (167 events per 100 patient-years vs 73 events per 100 patient-years; P = .042). However, ICD implantation rate at the end of WCD use was similar in both women and men (41% vs 39%; P = .448). Conclusion: In the WEARIT-II Registry, we have shown a higher burden of ventricular and atrial arrhythmic events in women than in men. ICD implantation rates at the end of WCD use were similar. Our findings warrant monitoring women at risk for sudden cardiac death who have a high burden of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias while using the WCD

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment

The aetiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is heterogenous and overlaps with that of several comorbidities like atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, valvular heart disease, iron deficiency, or sarcopenia. The diagnosis of HFpEF involves evaluating cardiac dysfunction through imaging techniques and assessing increased left ventricular filling pressure, which can be measured directly or estimated through various proxies including natriuretic peptides. To better narrow down the differential diagnosis of HFpEF, European and American heart failure guidelines advocate the use of different algorithms including comorbidities that require diagnosis and rigorous treatment during the evaluation process. Therapeutic recommendations differ between guidelines. Whilst sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors have a solid evidence base, the recommendations differ with regard to the use of inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone axis. Unless indicated for specific comorbidities, the use of beta-blockers should be discouraged in HFpEF. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current state of the art in HFpEF diagnosis, clinical evaluation, and treatment

Less loop diuretic use in patients on sacubitril/valsartan undergoing remote pulmonary artery pressure monitoring

Aims Control of pulmonary pressures monitored remotely reduced heart failure hospitalizations mainly by lowering filling pressures through the use of loop diuretics. Sacubitril/valsartan improves heart failure outcomes and increases the kidney sensitivity for diuretics. We explored whether sacubitril/valsartan is associated with less utilization of loop diuretics in patients guided with haemodynamic monitoring in the CardioMEMS European Monitoring Study for Heart Failure (MEMS-HF). Methods and results The MEMS-HF population (n = 239) was separated by the use of sacubitril/valsartan (n = 68) or no use of it (n = 164). Utilization of diuretics and their doses was prespecified in the protocol and was monitored in both groups. Multivariable regression, ANCOVA, and a generalized linear model were used to fit baseline covariates with furosemide equivalents and changes for 12 months. MEMS-HF participants (n = 239) were grouped in sacubitril/valsartan users [n = 68, 64 ± 11 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 25 ± 9%, cardiac index (CI) 1.89 ± 0.4 L/min/m2] vs. non-users (n = 164, 70 ± 10 years, LVEF 36 ± 16%, CI 2.11 ± 0.58 L/min/m2, P = 0.0002, P < 0.0001, and P = 0.0015, respectively). In contrast, mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) values were comparable between groups (29 ± 11 vs. 31 ± 11 mmHg, P = 0.127). Utilization of loop diuretics was lower in patients taking sacubitril/valsartan compared with those without (P = 0.01). Significant predictor of loop diuretic use was a history of renal failure (P = 0.005) but not age (P = 0.091). After subjects were stratified by sacubitril/valsartan or other diuretic use, PAP was nominally, but not significantly lower in sacubitril/valsartan-treated patients (baseline: P = 0.52; 6 months: P = 0.07; 12 months: P = 0.53), while there was no difference in outcome or PAP changes. This difference was observed despite lower CI (P = 0.0015). Comparable changes were not observed for other non-loop diuretics (P = 0.21). Conclusions In patients whose treatment was guided by remote PAP monitoring, concomitant use of sacubitril/valsartan was associated with reduced utilization of loop diuretics, which could potentially be relevant for outcomes

telemonitoring for chronic heart failure: narrative review of the 20-Year journey from concept to standard care in germany

Background: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is amajorcauseof morbidity and mortality worldwide, placing a significant burden on health care systems. The concept of telemedicine for CHF was first introduced in the late 1990s, and since 2010, studies have demonstrated its potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce health care costs. Over the following decade, technological advancements and changes in health care policy led to the development of more sophisticated telemedicine solutions for CHF, including remote patient management through invasive or noninvasive telemonitoring devices, mobile apps, and virtual consultations. Years of public funding in Germany have generated evidence that remote patient management improves outcomes for patients with CHF, such as quality of life, and reduces hospital admissions. Based on these data, the Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss; G-BA) decided, independently of the current European Society of Cardiology recommendations, to incorporate telemedicine as a standard digital intervention for high-risk patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in Germany in 2020. Objective: This review aims to illustratethejourney from the initial concept through pioneering studies that led to telemedicine's integration into standard care, and to share current experiences that have positioned Germany as a leader in cardiovascular telemedicine. Methods: We review and discuss existing literature and evidence on the development and implementation of telemonitoring for CHF in Germany over the past 20 years. Relevant studies, reports, and guidelines were identified through a comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and specialized journals focused on CHF telemonitoring. Results: Pioneering studies, such as the TIM-HF2 (Telemedical Interventional Management in Heart Failure II) and IN-TIME (Influence of Home Monitoring on Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure Patients with Impaired Left Ventricular Function) trials, demonstrated the effectiveness of remote patient management applications for patients with CHF in Germany and their applicability to current practices involving both invasive and noninvasive methods. Collaborations between researchers and technology developers overcame barriers, leading to sustainable improvements in patient care. Ongoing research on artificial intelligence applications for prioritizing and interpreting individual health data will continue to transform digital health care. Conclusions: The establishment of telemedical care for patients with HF across Europe is likely to benefit from experiences in Germany, where significant improvements have been achieved in the care of patients with HF

Need for a Standardized Translational Drug Development Platform: Lessons Learned from the Repurposing of Drugs for COVID-19

In the absence of drugs to treat or prevent COVID-19, drug repurposing can be a valuable strategy. Despite a substantial number of clinical trials, drug repurposing did not deliver on its promise. While success was observed with some repurposed drugs (e.g., remdesivir, dexamethasone, tocilizumab, baricitinib), others failed to show clinical efficacy. One reason is the lack of clear translational processes based on adequate preclinical profiling before clinical evaluation. Combined with limitations of existing in vitro and in vivo models, there is a need for a systematic approach to urgent antiviral drug development in the context of a global pandemic. We implemented a methodology to test repurposed and experimental drugs to generate robust preclinical evidence for further clinical development. This translational drug development platform comprises in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models of SARS-CoV-2, along with pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation approaches to evaluate exposure levels in plasma and target organs. Here, we provide examples of identified repurposed antiviral drugs tested within our multidisciplinary collaboration to highlight lessons learned in urgent antiviral drug development during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our data confirm the importance of assessing in vitro and in vivo potency in multiple assays to boost the translatability of pre-clinical data. The value of pharmacokinetic modeling and simulations for compound prioritization is also discussed. We advocate the need for a standardized translational drug development platform for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 to generate preclinical evidence in support of clinical trials. We propose clear prerequisites for progression of drug candidates for repurposing into clinical trials. Further research is needed to gain a deeper understanding of the scope and limitations of the presented translational drug development platform