198 research outputs found
The activity of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparins in rabbit plasma:The need for using absolute anti-factor Xa and antithrombin activities
Summary of the Standards, Options and Recommendations for the use of positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDP-PET scanning) in oncology (2002)
GuidelinePractice GuidelineResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
The inhibition of thrombin-dependent positive-feedback reactions is critical to the expression of the anticoagulant effect of heparin
A systematic review on the accumulation of prophylactic dosages of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in patients with renal insufficiency
PURPOSE: Although therapeutic dosages of most low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are known to accumulate in patients with renal insufficiency, for the lower prophylactic dosages this has not been clearly proven. Nevertheless, dose reduction is often recommended. We conducted a systematic review to investigate whether prophylactic dosages of LMWH accumulate in renal insufficient patients. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted on 17 February 2015 using Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed publisher, and Google scholar. The syntax emphasized for LMWHs, impaired renal function, and pharmacokinetics. The search yielded 674 publications. After exclusion by reading the titles, abstracts, and if necessary the full paper, 11 publications remained. RESULTS: For dalteparin and tinzaparin, no accumulation was observed. Enoxaparin, on the other hand, did lead to accumulation in patients with renal insufficiency, although not in patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. Bemiparin and certoparin also did show accumulation. No data were available for nadroparin. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, we show that prophylactic dosages of tinzaparin and dalteparin are likely to be safe in patients with renal insufficiency and do not need dose reduction based on the absence of accumulation. However, prophylactic dosages of enoxaparin, bemiparin, and certoparin did show accumulation in patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) below 30 ml/min, and therefore, dose reduction is required. The differences in occurrence of accumulation seem to depend on the mean molecular weight of LMWHs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-015-1880-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users
Associations between venous thromboembolism onset, D-dimer, and soluble fibrin monomer complex after total knee arthroplasty
P-selectin, carcinoma metastasis and heparin: novel mechanistic connections with therapeutic implications
Erythrocytes do not activate purified and platelet soluble guanylate cyclases even in conditions favourable for NO synthesis
New Antithrombotic Agents For The Prevention And Treatment Of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Besides low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) a number of new antithrombotic agents have been evaluated mainly in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and, to a lesser extent, in the treatment of established DVT. They include the Pentasaccharide, a synthetic ultra LMWH, Dermatan Sulphate, a glycosaminoglycan which activates heparin cofactor II, Orgaran, a mixture of Heparan and of Dermatan Sulphate, Hirulog and Hirudin, two direct thrombin inhibitors. The efficacy and safety of these compounds have been studied in comparison with a placebo or with unfractionated heparin but not with LMWH which is considered as a gold standard for these clinical indications. It is thus difficult at present to appreciate the advantages of these new antithrombotic agents over conventional LMWH therapy.</jats:p
Platelet Survival Time (51CR) and Platelet Production Time (Aspirin-Mda Method): A Simultaneous Evaluation in Patients Affected with Cancers
- …
