Management of Coeliac and Hepatic Artery Aneurysms: An Experience of 84 Cases

Objective: To report outcomes following open or endovascular treatment of true hepatic and coeliac artery aneurysms at a single referral centre. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients treated for true hepatic and coeliac artery aneurysms between May 2002 and December 2021. Outcome measures included complications, graft patency, and survival rate. Results: Overall, 84 patients were included with a median age of 63 years (interquartile range 55, 79). The majority (76%) of the patients were men. Frequent comorbidities included a history of tobacco (69%), hypertension (65%), hyperlipidaemia (32%), and diabetes (15%). Multiple synchronous aneurysms were detected in 22 patients (26%). There were 33 (39%) symptomatic aneurysms (abdominal pain without rupture [n = 18], rupture [n = 10], and sepsis [n = 5]). Seventeen patients (20%) had mycotic aetiology. Fifty patients (60%) underwent endovascular treatment with either covered stent placement (n = 29) or coil embolisation (n = 21), and 34 patients (40%) were treated with open surgery using allogenic iliac artery (n = 15), autologous saphenous vein (n = 15), GoreTex graft (n = 2), or ligation (n = 2). The complication rate was 32% in the open group and 18% in the endovascular group (p = .048). The overall 90 day post-operative mortality rate was 1.2%, five year primary patency was 90.0%, five year survival rate was 81.2%, and mean follow up was 6.9 ± 4.2 years. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment is the preferred approach whenever technically possible. Despite higher post-operative morbidity, an open approach with vascular reconstruction using autologous or allogenic vascular grafts yields acceptable long term results

Patient and clinician opinions of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of patients with rare diseases: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND Rare diseases may be life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions. Patient care needs are often complex and challenging to coordinate and deliver effectively. Rare diseases and their clinical management may therefore substantially impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may complement clinical assessments by elucidating patients' perspectives on their health status and care priorities. This study explored the opinions of patients and clinicians on the use of PROMs in the management of patients with rare diseases in routine clinical practice. METHODS A total of 15 semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted with four patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC); five renal transplant recipients; and six PSC doctors from University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB) NHS Foundation Trust. A focus group session was also conducted with 10 clinical staff members (doctors, nurses and other allied health professionals from UHB). The suitability and acceptability of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) and the Short Form 12 (SF12) were assessed by patients with PSC and their doctors while the Paediatric quality of life inventory Transplant Module (PedsQL-TM) and the EuroQoL-5 dimensions (EQ. 5D) were evaluated by the renal transplant recipients and their doctors. The discussions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Coding of the transcripts was done using the Nvivo 11 Plus software. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify the main themes and subthemes. RESULTS Four themes were identified, namely: (i) potential benefits of PROMs in the management of rare diseases; (ii) views on selected questionnaires; (iii) practical considerations for implementation; and (iv) potential facilitators and barriers of implementation. Patients and clinicians suggested that the use of ePROMs may facilitate patient-centred care by promoting patient-clinician communication, highlighting aspects of HRQOL that are important to patients and encouraging patient involvement in their care. They also felt that the disease-specific CLDQ and PedsQL-TM were more relevant than the generic SF12 and EQ-5D. CONCLUSIONS Patients with rare diseases often experience impaired HRQOL. The use of an ePROM system may enhance the routine management of patients with rare diseases