25 research outputs found

    Prevalence of high frequency hearing loss consistent with noise exposure among people working with sound systems and general population in Brazil: A cross-sectional study

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Music is ever present in our daily lives, establishing a link between humans and the arts through the senses and pleasure. Sound technicians are the link between musicians and audiences or consumers. Recently, general concern has arisen regarding occurrences of hearing loss induced by noise from excessively amplified sound-producing activities within leisure and professional environments. Sound technicians' activities expose them to the risk of hearing loss, and consequently put at risk their quality of life, the quality of the musical product and consumers' hearing. The aim of this study was to measure the prevalence of high frequency hearing loss consistent with noise exposure among sound technicians in Brazil and compare this with a control group without occupational noise exposure.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This was a cross-sectional study comparing 177 participants in two groups: 82 sound technicians and 95 controls (non-sound technicians). A questionnaire on music listening habits and associated complaints was applied, and data were gathered regarding the professionals' numbers of working hours per day and both groups' hearing complaint and presence of tinnitus. The participants' ear canals were visually inspected using an otoscope. Hearing assessments were performed (tonal and speech audiometry) using a portable digital AD 229 E audiometer funded by FAPESP.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was no statistically significant difference between the sound technicians and controls regarding age and gender. Thus, the study sample was homogenous and would be unlikely to lead to bias in the results. A statistically significant difference in hearing loss was observed between the groups: 50% among the sound technicians and 10.5% among the controls. The difference could be addressed to high sound levels.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The sound technicians presented a higher prevalence of high frequency hearing loss consistent with noise exposure than did the general population, although the possibility of residual confounding due to unmeasured factors such as socioeconomic status cannot be ruled out.</p

    On Objective Criteria for Hearing Impairment and Hearing Disability

    Full text link

    Hearing Impairment in Orchestral Musicians

    Full text link

    Painful Caliceal Calculi

    Full text link

    Audiological and Temporal Bone Findings in Myxedema

    Full text link
    Fifteen patients with confirmed myxedema at a median age of 48 years (range 32 to 60 years) were referred for audiological evaluation before and after treatment with levothyroxine. The median interval between the pretreatment and posttreatment investigations was 18 months (range 9 to 27 months). In addition, 13 patients at a median age of 78 years (range 64 to 95 years) were audiologically reexamined after long-standing levothyroxine treatment. The observation period upon treatment with levothyroxine was 40 months (range 32 to 46 months). No improvement in hearing sensitivity could be demonstrated either in the younger patients or in the elderly. When compared to an age- and sex-matched unscreened population, the myxedematous patients did not demonstrate any different degree of hearing loss. Histological investigation of the temporal bones from an 83-year-old woman with myxedema, however, showed no morphological changes or deposition of glycosaminoglycans, changes which are compatible with true age-related hearing loss. It is concluded that no association exists between myxedema and hearing impairment and that no morphological or structural changes due to myxedema can be demonstrated in the temporal bones. </jats:p
    corecore