Safety and efficacy of odronextamab in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma

Background: Odronextamab, a CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody that engages cytotoxic T cells to destroy malignant B cells, has demonstrated encouraging activity across multiple subtypes of relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients and methods: This phase II study (ELM-2; NCT03888105) evaluated odronextamab in patients with R/R follicular lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy. Patients received intravenous odronextamab in 21-day cycles, with step-up dosing in cycle 1 to help mitigate the risk of cytokine release syndrome, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by independent central review. Results: Among 128 patients evaluated, 95% completed cycle 1, and 85% completed four or more cycles. At 20.1 months’ efficacy follow-up, objective response rate was 80.0% and complete response rate was 73.4%. Median duration of complete response was 25.1 months. Median progression-free survival was 20.7 months, and median overall survival was not reached. Discontinuation of odronextamab due to adverse events occurred in 16% of patients. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were cytokine release syndrome [56%; grade ≥3 1.7% (1/60) with 0.7/4/20 mg step-up], neutropenia (39%), and pyrexia (38%). Conclusions: Odronextamab achieved high complete response rates with generally manageable safety in patients with heavily pretreated R/R follicular lymphoma

IELSG38: phase II trial of front-line chlorambucil plus subcutaneous rituximab induction and maintenance in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma

The IELSG38 trial was conducted to investigate the effects of subcutaneous (SC) rituximab on the complete remission (CR) rate and the benefits of SC rituximab maintenance in patients with extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) who received front-line treatment with chlorambucil plus rituximab. Study treatment was an induction phase with oral chlorambucil 6 mg/m2/day on weeks 1-6, 9-10, 13-14, 17-18, and 21-22, and intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of weeks 1-4, and 1,400 mg SC on weeks 9, 13, 17, and 21. Then, a maintenance phase followed with rituximab administered at 1,400 mg SC every two months for two years. Of the 112 patients enrolled, 109 were evaluated for efficacy. The CR rates increased from 52% at the end of the induction phase to 70% upon completion of the maintenance phase. With a median follow-up of 5.8 years, the 5-year event-free, progression-free, and overall survival rates were 87% (95% CI: 78-92), 84% (95% CI: 75-89), and 93% (95% CI: 86-96), respectively. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities were neutropenia (33%) and lymphocytopenia (16%). Six patients experienced treatment-related serious adverse events, including fever of unknown origin, sepsis, pneumonia, respiratory failure, severe cerebellar ataxia, and fatal acute myeloid leukemia. The trial showed that SC rituximab did not improve the CR rate at the conclusion of the induction phase, which was the main endpoint. Nevertheless, SC rituximab maintenance might have facilitated long-term disease control, potentially contributing to enhanced event-free and progression-free survival

Azacitidine salvage therapy for relapse of myeloid malignancies following allogeneic hematopoietic SCT

International audiencePatients with hematopoietic malignancies relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT) have a poor prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed the patients who received azacitidine in our center in the course of treatment of their post-transplant relapse. We identified 31 patients. Relapse occurred at a median of 3.7 (1.7-37.6) months following allo-HSCT. Patients received a median number of three cycles (1-12) of azacitidine (7 days, 75 mg/m(2) daily). Thirty-nine percent of patients had either a monosomal karyotype or a complex karyotype. Eleven patients (35%) received at least one DLI. Eleven patients responded to azacitidine, with four patients achieving a CR (13%). Median time to best response was 92 (35-247) days, with a median duration of 209 (64-751) days. One-year estimated survival rate was 14%. In conclusion, azacitidine may reinduce durable remissions in very few patients with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome. The toxicity related to azacitidine was high, although it may be difficult to distinguish between treatment-related side effects, namely due to cytopenia and toxicity due to the relapse or disease progression itself. Early administration of azacitidine after transplant followed by DLI should be considered as a pre-emptive therapy for potential relapse in patients with minimal residual disease or high-risk myeloid malignancies