Which facets of mindfulness protect Individuals from the negative experiences of obsessive intrusive thoughts?

Obsessive intrusive thoughts (OITs) are experienced by the majority of the general population, and in their more extreme forms are characteristic of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). These cognitions are said to exist on a continuum that includes differences in their frequency and associated distress. The key factors that contribute to an increased frequency and distress are how the individual appraises and responds to the OIT. Facets of mindfulness, such as nonjudgment and nonreactivity, offer an alternative approach to OITs than the negative appraisals and commonly utilised control strategies that often contribute to distress. Clarifying the role of facets of mindfulness in relation to these cognitions offers a means to elucidate individual characteristics that may offer protection from distress associated with OITs. A sample of nonclinical individuals (n = 583) completed an online survey that assessed their experiences of OITs, including frequency, emotional reaction and appraisals, and trait mindfulness. The findings from a series of multiple regression analyses confirmed that specific facets of mindfulness relating to acting with awareness and acceptance (nonjudgment and nonreactivity) consistently predicted less frequent and distressing experiences of OITs. In contrast, the observe facet emerged as a consistent predictor of negative experiences of OITs. These findings suggest that acting with awareness and acceptance may confer protective characteristics in relation to OITs, but that the observe facet may reflect a hypervigilance to OITs. Mindfulness-based prevention and intervention for OCD should be tailored to take account of the potential differential effects of increasing specific facets of mindfulness

Unveiling the Potential of AI in Plastic Surgery Education: A Comparative Study of Leading AI Platforms’ Performance on In-training Examinations

Background:. Within the last few years, artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have sparked fascination for their potential as an educational tool. Although it has been documented that one such chatbot, ChatGPT, is capable of performing at a moderate level on plastic surgery examinations and has the capacity to become a beneficial educational tool, the potential of other chatbots remains unexplored. Methods:. To investigate the efficacy of AI chatbots in plastic surgery education, performance on the 2019–2023 Plastic Surgery In-service Training Examination (PSITE) was compared among seven popular AI platforms: ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, Google Bard, Google PaLM, Microsoft Bing AI, Claude, and My AI by Snapchat. Answers were evaluated for accuracy and incorrect responses were characterized by question category and error type. Results:. ChatGPT-4.0 outperformed the other platforms, reaching accuracy rates up to 79%. On the 2023 PSITE, ChatGPT-4.0 ranked in the 95th percentile of first-year residents; however, relative performance worsened when compared with upper-level residents, with the platform ranking in the 12th percentile of sixth-year residents. The performance among other chatbots was comparable, with their average PSITE score (2019–2023) ranging from 48.6% to 57.0%. Conclusions:. Results of our study indicate that ChatGPT-4.0 has potential as an educational tool in the field of plastic surgery; however, given their poor performance on the PSITE, the use of other chatbots should be cautioned against at this time. To our knowledge, this is the first article comparing the performance of multiple AI chatbots within the realm of plastic surgery education