A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity

Our growing awareness of the microbial world’s importance and diversity contrasts starkly with our limited understanding of its fundamental structure. Despite recent advances in DNA sequencing, a lack of standardized protocols and common analytical frameworks impedes comparisons among studies, hindering the development of global inferences about microbial life on Earth. Here we present a meta-analysis of microbial community samples collected by hundreds of researchers for the Earth Microbiome Project. Coordinated protocols and new analytical methods, particularly the use of exact sequences instead of clustered operational taxonomic units, enable bacterial and archaeal ribosomal RNA gene sequences to be followed across multiple studies and allow us to explore patterns of diversity at an unprecedented scale. The result is both a reference database giving global context to DNA sequence data and a framework for incorporating data from future studies, fostering increasingly complete characterization of Earth’s microbial diversity

A communal catalogue reveals Earth's multiscale microbial diversity

Our growing awareness of the microbial world's importance and diversity contrasts starkly with our limited understanding of its fundamental structure. Despite recent advances in DNA sequencing, a lack of standardized protocols and common analytical frameworks impedes comparisons among studies, hindering the development of global inferences about microbial life on Earth. Here we present a meta-analysis of microbial community samples collected by hundreds of researchers for the Earth Microbiome Project. Coordinated protocols and new analytical methods, particularly the use of exact sequences instead of clustered operational taxonomic units, enable bacterial and archaeal ribosomal RNA gene sequences to be followed across multiple studies and allow us to explore patterns of diversity at an unprecedented scale. The result is both a reference database giving global context to DNA sequence data and a framework for incorporating data from future studies, fostering increasingly complete characterization of Earth's microbial diversity.Peer reviewe

ARTEFACTS: How do we want to deal with the future of our one and only planet?

The European Commission’s Science and Knowledge Service, the Joint Research Centre (JRC), decided to try working hand-in-hand with leading European science centres and museums. Behind this decision was the idea that the JRC could better support EU Institutions in engaging with the European public. The fact that European Union policies are firmly based on scientific evidence is a strong message which the JRC is uniquely able to illustrate. Such a collaboration would not only provide a platform to explain the benefits of EU policies to our daily lives but also provide an opportunity for European citizens to engage by taking a more active part in the EU policy making process for the future. A PILOT PROGRAMME To test the idea, the JRC launched an experimental programme to work with science museums: a perfect partner for three compelling reasons. Firstly, they attract a large and growing number of visitors. Leading science museums in Europe have typically 500 000 visitors per year. Furthermore, they are based in large European cities and attract local visitors as well as tourists from across Europe and beyond. The second reason for working with museums is that they have mastered the art of how to communicate key elements of sophisticated arguments across to the public and making complex topics of public interest readily accessible. That is a high-value added skill and a crucial part of the valorisation of public-funded research, never to be underestimated. Finally museums are, at present, undergoing something of a renaissance. Museums today are vibrant environments offering new techniques and technologies to both inform and entertain, and attract visitors of all demographics.JRC.H.2-Knowledge Management Methodologies, Communities and Disseminatio

The attraction of islands: travellers and tourists in the Cyclades (Greece) in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries

Islands have long acted as projection surfaces of ever-changing desires. Tourism organisations have drawn most vigorously upon the paradise metaphor in an attempt to position modern island holidays at the forefront of our minds – regardless of an island\u27s location. Tracing the most recent history of our island-longing and illuminating the use of the island metaphor by tourist organisations is the aim of this article. A short account of the history of tourism in Greece (especially the Cycladic Islands) provides the backdrop to an in-depth picture and text analysis of nine official English and German tourist guides to the Cyclades, as well as the English-speaking version of the official Cyclades website. Images and text are coded according to pre-determined themes and contrasted with each other. Investigating islands from the perspective of tourists and tourist organisations, it becomes apparent that the official brochures draw on established island tropes and stereotypical island imagery as a means to attract travellers, and thus follow a long-established pattern of what Western culture considers unique for island locations. Dissonances, however, are emerging as our longing for island locations is contradicted by our need for ease and speed of access, thus negating the sought-after quintessential ‘islandness’

Treatment Outcomes and Definition Inconsistencies in High-Risk Unilateral Retinoblastoma

Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of children with unilateral retinoblastoma (Rb) and high-risk histopathology features (HRHF) following upfront enucleation with/without adjuvant chemotherapy, and investigate cases locally considered non-HRHF but converted to a standardized HRHF definition. Design: Retrospective multinational clinical cohort study. Methods: Children with Rb who presented to 21 centers from 12 countries between 2011-2020, and underwent primary enucleation were recruited. Centers retrieved clinical data and were asked to report detailed histopathology findings, as well as indicate cases defined locally as high-risk. For analysis, only unilateral cases with standardized HRHF, defined as retrolaminar optic nerve invasion, massive choroidal invasion, scleral invasion, anterior-segment involvement, and/or combined nonmassive choroidal and prelaminar/laminar optic nerve invasion, were included. Main outcome measures included orbital tumor recurrence, systemic metastasis, survival and number, and outcome of cases converted to standardized HRHF. Results: A total of 600 children presenting to 14 centers in 9 countries were included. Of these, 505 (84.2%) were considered locally as HRHF and received adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up period of 39.2 ± 1.6 months (range: 0.8-60.0 months), 36 (6.0%) had orbital tumor recurrence, 49 (8.2%) metastasis, and 72 (12.0%) children died. Children not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were at significantly increased risk of orbital tumor recurrence, metastasis, and death (P ≤ .002). Of the study children, 63/600 (10.5%) were considered locally non-HRHF, but converted to standardized HRHF and included in the analysis. Of these, 6/63 (9.5%) had orbital tumor recurrence, 5/63 (7.9%) metastasis, and 6/63 (9.5%) children died. Isolated minor choroidal invasion with prelaminar/laminar optic nerve invasion was reported in 114 (19.0%) children, but considered locally as HRHF only in 68/114 (59.6%). Of these, 6/114 (5.3%) children developed metastasis and subsequently died, yielding a number needed to treat of 15. Conclusion: Based on this multinational cohort of children with Rb, we recommend the use of adjuvant chemotherapy following upfront enucleation and diagnosis of HRHF. Variation exists worldwide among centers when defining HRHF, resulting in adverse patient outcomes, warranting standardization