Comparative gut transcriptome analysis reveals differences between virulent and avirulent Russian wheat aphids, Diuraphis noxia

Citation: Anathakrishnan, R., Sinha, D. K., Murugan, M., Zhu, K. Y., Chen, M. S., Zhu, Y. C., & Smith, C. M. (2014). Comparative gut transcriptome analysis reveals differences between virulent and avirulent Russian wheat aphids, Diuraphis noxia. Retrieved from http://krex.ksu.eduThe Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia, is a destructive pest of cereal crops that exhibits virulence to D. noxia resistance genes in wheat. Therefore, it is important to identify D. noxia virulence factors. The insect gut, the primary site of defense to ingested toxins, is also a likely site of differential gene expression in virulent insects. Comparative analyses of gut transcriptomes from virulent and avirulent D. noxia can improve an understanding of aphid gut physiology and may reveal factors critical to compatible D. noxia-wheat interactions. A total of 4, 600 clones were sequenced from gut cDNA libraries prepared from avirulent (biotype 1) and virulent (biotype 2) D. noxia feeding on biotype 1-resistant wheat. A majority of the sequences (66% in biotype 1, 64% in biotype 2) matched those from the NR database. BLASTX analysis of sequences with the highest E-values revealed that 59% of the biotype 1 sequences matched those of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. However, only 17% of the biotype 2 sequences were similar to those of A. pisum. RT-qPCR expression analyses confirmed that the biotype 2 gut transcriptome differs significantly from that of biotype 1. A transcript coding the tRNA-Leu gene was significantly up-regulated in the biotype 2 transcriptome, strongly suggesting that leucine metabolism is a critical factor in biotype 2 survival. Many more transcripts encoding protease inhibitors occurred in the avirulent biotype 1 gut than in the gut of virulent biotype 2. However, more protease transcripts occurred in the biotype 2 gut than in the biotype 1 gut, suggesting that the avirulent biotype produces protease inhibitors in response to plant proteases. The virulent biotype 2 produces trypsin-like and chymotrypsin-like serine protease counter-defenses to overcome biotype 1-resistant plants

An effective nonchemical treatment for head lice: A lot of hot air. American academy of pediatrics

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES. Head lice (Pediculus humanus capitis) are a major irritant to children and their parents around the world. Each year millions of children are infested with head lice, a condition known as pediculosis, which is responsible for tens of millions of lost school days. Head lice have evolved resistance to many of the currently used pediculicides; therefore, an effective new treatment for head lice is needed. In this study we examined the effectiveness of several methods that use hot air to kill head lice and their eggs. METHODS. We tested 6 different treatment methods on a total of 169 infested individuals. Each method delivers hot air to the scalp in a different way. We evaluated how well these methods kill lice and their eggs in situ. We also performed follow-up inspections to evaluate whether the sixth, most successful, method can cure head louse infestations. RESULTS. All 6 methods resulted in high egg mortality (Ն88%), but they showed more-variable success in killing hatched lice. The most successful method, which used a custom-built machine called the LouseBuster, resulted in nearly 100% mortality of eggs and 80% mortality of hatched lice. The LouseBuster was effective in killing lice and their eggs when operated at a comfortable temperature, slightly cooler than a standard blow-dryer. Virtually all subjects were cured of head lice when examined 1 week after treatment with the LouseBuster. There were no adverse effects of treatment. CONCLUSIONS. Our findings demonstrate that one 30-minute application of hot air has the potential to eradicate head lice infestations. In summary, hot air is an effective, safe treatment and one to which lice are unlikely to evolve resistance. www.pediatrics.org/cg