Effect of magnesium given 1 hour after head trauma on brain edema and neurological outcome

✓ Excitatory amino acids (EAA), mainly glutamate and aspartate, are released in excessive amounts from terminals of ischemic or traumatically injured neurons. These excessive levels of EAAs initiate a cascade of events believed to lead to secondary delayed damage to the surrounding brain. The N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonists MK-801 and ketamine are reported to suppress excessive EAA release and to attenuate the development of focal brain edema following neuronal injury. Magnesium is also reported to work at the postsynaptic receptor to reduce the neurotoxic effect of glutamate. The present study was undertaken to examine the effect of postinjury treatment with Mg++ on brain edema and neurological outcome after traumatic brain injury. Sixty-nine rats that survived halothane anesthesia and closed head trauma (CHT) were randomly assigned to one of seven experimental groups: sham, CHT, and CHT with administration of Mg++ 1 hour postinjury. At 48 hours, brain tissue Mg++ concentration (calculated from optical density using a standard curve) was significantly increased compared to baseline levels (10.06 ± 2.44 mg/g vs. 6.83 ± 0.81 mg/g, p &lt; 0.01 calculated by one-way analysis of variance). Also at 48 hours postinjury, brain tissue specific gravity in the contused hemisphere of Mg++-treated rats was significantly greater than that in the contused hemisphere of untreated rats, indicating attenuation of brain edema formation by Mg++. The neurological severity score (NSS) of rats treated with Mg++ improved significantly at both 18 and 48 hours, compared to baseline values obtained 1 hour after CHT but prior to administration of Mg++ (11.2 ± 2.5 vs. 15.2 ± 4.1, p = 0.03; and 12.3 ± 6.1 vs. 17.3 ± 3.6, p = 0.004, respectively). In the untreated groups, the NSS at 18 and 48 hours was not significantly different from baseline values (that is, no neurological improvement). The present study indicates that postinjury treatment with Mg++ attenuates brain edema formation and improves neurological outcome after experimental CHT.</jats:p

Consumer versus resource control of species diversity and ecosystem functioning

A key question in ecology is which factors control species diversity in a community1, 2, 3. Two largely separate groups of ecologists have emphasized the importance of productivity or resource supply, and consumers or physical disturbance, respectively. These variables show unimodal relationships with diversity when manipulated in isolation4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Recent multivariate models9, 10, however, predict that these factors interact, such that the disturbance–diversity relationship depends on productivity, and vice versa. We tested these models in marine food webs, using field manipulations of nutrient resources and consumer pressure on rocky shores of contrasting productivity. Here we show that the effects of consumers and nutrients on diversity consistently depend on each other, and that the direction of their effects and peak diversity shift between sites of low and high productivity. Factorial meta-analysis of published experiments confirms these results across widely varying aquatic communities. Furthermore, our experiments demonstrate that these patterns extend to important ecosystem functions such as carbon storage and nitrogen retention. This suggests that human impacts on nutrient supply11 and food-web structure12, 13 have strong and interdependent effects on species diversity and ecosystem functioning, and must therefore be managed together