644 research outputs found
Meta-analysis for physiotherapists: on the importance of standardization and blinding in the study of literature
The influence of physical activity and fractures on ultrasound parameters in elderly people
In this cross-sectional study we investigated the relationship between ultrasound measurements in the calcaneus versus daily physical activity and fractures sustained in the past in elderly subjects. Ultrasound measurements were performed at both heels, which enabled us to examine determinants of differences between contralateral heels. Participants were 132 men and 578 women, aged 70 years and over (mean age and standard deviation (SD): 83 ± 6 years), living in homes for the elderly (n = 343) or apartment houses for the elderly (n = 367). Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) were measured in the right and left calcaneus. The median difference (and interquartile range) between the two heels for BUA and SOS, expressed as a percentage of the mean value for each individual, was 9.6% (4.2-15.7%) and 1.0% (0.4-1.7%), corresponding to 25% and 40% of the study population SDI respectively. Greater differences in BUA between the two heels were associated with variables indicating poorer functional status, such as past fractures at the lower extremities. The level of daily physical activity was obtained by means of a questionnaire regarding household and leisure activities. Subsequently sumscores were calculated for daily physical activity and a subscore indicating weight-bearing physical activity. After adjustment for age, gender, residence, and body weight, physical activity scores were positively linearly related to both BUA and SOS. Each 5 point increase on the weight-bearing physical activity score, corresponding to, for example, walking for 2.5 h per week, was associated with a difference in BUA of 4.7 dB/MHz and in SOS of 5.1 m/s, which is similar to the differences associated with 10 kg higher body weight, or 10 years younger age. After the age of 50 years 47 subjects had fractured a hip, 61 subjects had sustained another lower extremity fracture, 104 subjects a wrist fracture, and 62 subjects another upper extremity fracture. After adjusting for age, gender and residence, odds ratios for all fracture types in the lowest terciles of BUA and SOS versus the highest terciles ranged from 1.9 to 3.8. This study showed significant differences in ultrasound measurements between the left and the right heel, indicating that measurements at both sides are necessary for optimal evaluation of bone strength. Furthermore, after careful adjustments, ultrasound parameters had higher values with higher daily physical activity in elderly subjects and discriminated subjects with a history of fracture from those without
The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: A practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke
Objectives: To determine the intra- and interrater reliability of the Action Research Arm (ARA) test, to assess its ability to detect a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 5.7 points, and to identify less reliable test items. Design: Intrarater reliability of the sum scores and of individual items was assessed by comparing (1) the ratings of the laboratory measurements of 20 patients with the ratings of the same measurements recorded on videotape by the original rater, and (2) the repeated ratings of videotaped measurements by the same rater. Interrater reliability was assessed by comparing the ratings of the videotaped measurements of 2 raters. The resulting limits of agreement were compared with the MCID. Patients: Stratified sample, based on the intake ARA score, of 20 chronic stroke patients (median age, 62yr; median time since stroke onset, 3.6yr; mean intake ARA score, 29.2). Main Outcome Measures: Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient (Spearman's rho); intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); mean difference and limits of agreement, based on ARA sum scores; and weighted kappa, based on individual items. Results: All intra- and interrater Spearman's rho and ICC values were higher than .98. The mean difference between ratings was highest for the interrater pair (.75; 95% confidence interval, .02-1.48), suggesting a small systematic difference between raters. Intrarater limits of agreement were -1.66 to 2.26; interrater limits of agreement were -2.35 to 3.85. Median weighted kappas exceeded .92. Conclusion: The high intra- and interrater reliability of the ARA test was confirmed, as was its ability to detect a clinically relevant difference of 5.7 points
Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures - Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example
Objective: This article outlines basic methods for quantifying reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Methods: The background noise in stable patients provides the desired information to quantify the reproducibility. From this, the smallest real difference (SRD) for longitudinal differences can be derived. We propose to use the SRD to define responsiveness: from all patients who change according to an external criterion, we take the percentage that changes at least SRD on the outcome measure. A more complete picture of the responsiveness of the outcome measure arises when the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) is constructed, corresponding to all possible cut-off change scores. The proposed methods are illustrated with an empirical example. Results: In the illustration the methods appeared to be very useful and complemented each other. We could evaluate whether the observed change score was larger than that expected due to chance. With the methods it was possible to evaluate both the ability of an instrument to detect change if there is a real change in health status (sensitivity to change) and the ability to detect absence of change if there is no real change (specificity to change). Conclusion: We presented the use of SRDs and ROC curves for quantifying reproducibility and responsiveness. We started with the basic notions and arrived at methods that are both understandable and useful
Parents' perceptions, attitudes and behaviours towards child safety: a study in 14 European countries
Injury is the leading cause of death for children 0- 19 years of age in Europe, accounting for 3.1 deaths per 10 000 children per year. The youngest children of the ages 0-4 years require the most protection in this age group, with 2.5 injury-related deaths per 10 000 children in Europe annually. As parents are the primary caregivers of children, it is necessary to learn more about parents' perceptions, attitudes and behaviours towards child safety. This study presents the findings of a 14-country study in Europe on this theme. A quantitative survey of parents of children aged 5 years or under was performed in 14 EU member states in order to enable better targeting of prevention efforts aimed at educating parents. The total sample size was 2088. The results show that 95% of parents reported that they personally take measures to avoid accidental injury to their children. Their top concern with regard to safety of their children was children being hit by a car. The most common response, when asked why some parents find it difficult to protect their children from accidental injury, was not being able to watch their children constantly. Lack of awareness or knowledge about the causes of accidents was the second response. Two-thirds of parents would like to see more help from the government to prevent childhood injuries. Three-quarters of parents agreed that child injuries can be avoided. It was concluded that parents want to be better informed about the causes of child accidents and about actions they and society can take to reduce injury-related risks to childre
Ultrasound measurements for the prediction of osteoporotic fractures in elderly people
In this prospective study we investigated the predictive value of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements and other potential predictors of osteoporotic fractures in the elderly. During a I-year period, 710 participants (132 men and 578 women), aged 70 years and older (mean age ± SD: 82.8 ± 5.9), were recruited from seven homes and apartment houses for the elderly. QUS measurements (broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS)) were assessed with a clinical bone densitometer. A structured questionnaire was used to collect information on other potential predictors. Follow-up of fractures was done each half year by telephone interviews. During the study period (median follow-up 2.8 years, maximum 3.7 years), 30 participants had a first hip fracture and 54 suffered from a first other nonspinal fracture. Cox regression analyses, adjusted for age and sex, showed that the relative risk (RR) of hip fracture for each standard deviation reduction was 2.3 (95% CI, 1.4-3.7) for BUA and 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.3) for SOS. Slightly weaker relationships were found for any fracture (BUA: RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.1; SOS: RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.6). Multivariable analyses identified low BUA values and immobility as the strongest predictors for hip fractures and any fracture. Female gender proved to be the strongest predictor for other nonspinal fractures. It can be concluded that QUS measurements can predict the risk for hip fracture and any fracture in elderly people
- …
