268 research outputs found

    A Gender-Based Approach to Oral Health Changes Across the Lifespan

    Get PDF
    As many other aspects of human health, oral health differs between men and women, especially at specific life stages. Since many stages of the female life are characterized by vast changes in reproductive hormones, there are corresponding changes that occur throughout the body, including the oral cavity. The sex and age specific changes and risk factors associated with oral health are often overlooked by health care professionals and the general population. This review seeks to elucidate the particular risk factors to which women are susceptible as they age, and point out where during the life course female oral health differs from that of males. Since men and women experience different changes in general and oral health during the course of their lives, health care professionals need to make care more gender and age specific. Dentists are in a particularly good position to implement sex and age specific care because of the regularity with which it is recommended people visit their dentists. Acknowledgement that women of different ages have specific oral health concerns will likely lead to improved oral health status in women of all ages

    Embracing dynamic public health policy impacts in infectious diseases responses: leveraging implementation science to improve practice

    Get PDF
    RationaleThe host-pathogen relationship is inherently dynamic and constantly evolving. Applying an implementation science lens to policy evaluation suggests that policy impacts are variable depending upon key implementation outcomes (feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness costs) and conditions and contexts.COVID-19 case studyExperiences with non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) including masking, testing, and social distancing/business and school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic response highlight the importance of considering public health policy impacts through an implementation science lens of constantly evolving contexts, conditions, evidence, and public perceptions. As implementation outcomes (feasibility, acceptability) changed, the effectiveness of these interventions changed thereby altering public health policy impact. Sustainment of behavioral change may be a key factor determining the duration of effectiveness and ultimate impact of pandemic policy recommendations, particularly for interventions that require ongoing compliance at the level of the individual.Practical framework for assessing and evaluating pandemic policyUpdating public health policy recommendations as more data and alternative interventions become available is the evidence-based policy approach and grounded in principles of implementation science and dynamic sustainability. Achieving the ideal of real-time policy updates requires improvements in public health data collection and analysis infrastructure and a shift in public health messaging to incorporate uncertainty and the necessity of ongoing changes. In this review, the Dynamic Infectious Diseases Public Health Response Framework is presented as a model with a practical tool for iteratively incorporating implementation outcomes into public health policy design with the aim of sustaining benefits and identifying when policies are no longer functioning as intended and need to be adapted or de-implemented.Conclusions and implicationsReal-time decision making requires sensitivity to conditions on the ground and adaptation of interventions at all levels. When asking about the public health effectiveness and impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions, the focus should be on when, how, and for how long they can achieve public health impact. In the future, rather than focusing on models of public health intervention effectiveness that assume static impacts, policy impacts should be considered as dynamic with ongoing re-evaluation as conditions change to meet the ongoing needs of the ultimate end-user of the intervention: the public

    Pandemic scientific data sharing recommendations: examining and re-imagining pre-print servers after the end of the world-wide emergency

    Get PDF
    Early in the pandemic, pre-print servers sped rapid evidence sharing. A collaborative of major medical journals supported their use to ensure equitable access to scientific advancements. In the intervening three years, we have made major advancements in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 and learned about the benefits and limitations of pre-prints as a mechanism for sharing and disseminating scientific knowledge

    Impact of lifting school mask mandates on community SARS-CoV-2 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths: a retrospective observational study

    Get PDF
    BackgroundSchool masking mandates were widely adopted as a pandemic control measure, however, limited data are available regarding their effectiveness as a strategy for reducing burden of disease in the surrounding community.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of school masking policy de-adoption (mask-lifting) on SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates, hospitalizations, and deaths in the surrounding community.MethodsDesign: Retrospective observational study with an event study design, a difference-in-difference method; a target trial emulation (TTE) framework was applied as a secondary analysis. Cohort creation: Data collected from 9/2021 to 6/2022 on SARS-CoV-2 cases, hospitalizations, deaths and vaccination rates were combined with district-level masking policy data. Analysis: In the event study, the impact of masking policy de-adoption on SARS-CoV-2 cases per 100,000 county residents stratified by age during the 8-week period following the policy change was estimated. Effects on hospitalization and deaths per 1,000,000 residents were secondarily estimated. In a secondary analysis, a target trial emulation framework was applied to estimate average treatment effects.ResultsN = 3,970 districts composed of 53,453 schools were included in the cohort. In the event study, no consistent trends for COVID-19 case rates were identified for the whole cohort or for any age group. For the whole cohort, there was a statistically significant increase found 6–8 weeks following the policy change (maximum increase, 1.91 hospitalizations per 1,000,000 county residents); increases in hospitalizations were also found in the stratified analysis for all age groups, although absolute impacts were small. An increase in deaths was found during the period from 4 to 7 weeks following the policy change (maximum increase 0.62 deaths per 1,000,000 residents). In the stratified analysis, small increases in death rates were seen in 50–69 year olds (range, 0.088–1.49) and >70 year olds (range, 0.23–2.58) but not in younger groups. In the TTE framework, cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were similar in control and intervention counties.ConclusionThis study evaluating the impact of lifting of mask mandates in schools, analyzed in two ways, was consistent results ranging from no impact to a small but statistically significant impact of the policy change on SARS-CoV-2 case and severe outcomes rates in the surrounding community. Findings can be used to inform future pandemic policy responses for elementary and secondary schools

    National Cohort Study of Preoperative Bacteriuria, Surgical Prophylaxis, and Postoperative Outcomes

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background: Despite recommendations against screening urine for bacteriuria prior to non-urological surgery, it is still a common practice. If the urine culture (Ucx) is positive, clinicians often feel compelled to give targeted therapy or expand the peri-operative prophylaxis (PPX) regimen to cover the urinary organism. Large multicenter studies are lacking. We aimed to evaluate rates and results of preoperative urine screening and postoperative outcomes among a national cohort of surgical patients. Methods: All patients who underwent cardiac, orthopedic implant, or vascular surgery within the national VA health care system during the period from 10/1/08–9/30/13 and had the PPX regimen manually validated were included. Rates of positive Ucx and wound cultures during the 90-day post-operative period were compared between patients with and without pre-operative bacteriuria. Among patients with a positive pre-op urine culture the association between activity of surgical PPX and positive post-op cultures was evaluated. Results: N = 78,810 surgeries were evaluated (21,889 cardiac, 46,565 orthopedic implant, 10,356 vascular). A pre-op Ucx was performed in 26% (Fig); of these, 6.6% were positive and 852 (63%) received PPX active against the uropathogen. Positive pre-op Ucx was associated with higher rates of positive post-op Ucx and wound cultures (Fig). Among patients who received active PPX, post-op Ucx was positive in 46% compared with 39% who received inactive PPX. The rate of post-op wound cultures was not different between patients who received active (25%) vs. inactive (24%) PPX. The pre-op and post-op organisms were the same in 117/221 (52.9%) Ucx and 17/104 (16.3%) wound cultures, respectively. PPX activity did not affect the match rate. Conclusion: This is the largest, multicenter study demonstrating no difference in post-op urine and wound cultures in patients receiving active vs. inactive surgical PPX for pre-op bacteriuria. Prevalence of bacteriuria was similar to other surgical populations. Limitations include predominantly male population and need for further characterization of pre-op antibiotic therapy and UTI and SSI outcomes. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures

    Engaging Patients in Antimicrobial Stewardship: Co-designed Educational Tool to Improve Periprocedural Care Through De-implementation of Guideline-Discordant Antimicrobial Use

    Get PDF
    Effective de-implementation models often include replacement of an ineffective practice with an alternative. We co-developed patient education materials as a replacement strategy for inappropriate post-procedural antibiotics in cardiac device procedures. Lessons learned and developed materials may be used to promote infection prevention in other periprocedural settings

    SHEA position statement on pandemic preparedness for policymakers: introduction and overview.

    Get PDF
    Throughout history, pandemics and their aftereffects have spurred society to make substantial improvements in healthcare. After the Black Death in 14th century Europe, changes were made to elevate standards of care and nutrition that resulted in improved life expectancy. The 1918 influenza pandemic spurred a movement that emphasized public health surveillance and detection of future outbreaks and eventually led to the creation of the World Health Organization Global Influenza Surveillance Network. In the present, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed many of the pre-existing problems within the US healthcare system, which included (1) a lack of capacity to manage a large influx of contagious patients while simultaneously maintaining routine and emergency care to non-COVID patients; (2) a "just in time" supply network that led to shortages and competition among hospitals, nursing homes, and other care sites for essential supplies; and (3) longstanding inequities in the distribution of healthcare and the healthcare workforce. The decades-long shift from domestic manufacturing to a reliance on global supply chains has compounded ongoing gaps in preparedness for supplies such as personal protective equipment and ventilators. Inequities in racial and socioeconomic outcomes highlighted during the pandemic have accelerated the call to focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within our communities. The pandemic accelerated cooperation between government entities and the healthcare system, resulting in swift implementation of mitigation measures, new therapies and vaccinations at unprecedented speeds, despite our fragmented healthcare delivery system and political divisions. Still, widespread misinformation or disinformation and political divisions contributed to eroded trust in the public health system and prevented an even uptake of mitigation measures, vaccines and therapeutics, impeding our ability to contain the spread of the virus in this country. Ultimately, the lessons of COVID-19 illustrate the need to better prepare for the next pandemic. Rising microbial resistance, emerging and re-emerging pathogens, increased globalization, an aging population, and climate change are all factors that increase the likelihood of another pandemic

    SHEA position statement on pandemic preparedness for policymakers: pandemic data collection, maintenance, and release.

    Get PDF
    The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology in America (SHEA) strongly supports modernization of data collection processes and the creation of publicly available data repositories that include a wide variety of data elements and mechanisms for securely storing both cleaned and uncleaned data sets that can be curated as clinical and research needs arise. These elements can be used for clinical research and quality monitoring and to evaluate the impacts of different policies on different outcomes. Achieving these goals will require dedicated, sustained and long-term funding to support data science teams and the creation of central data repositories that include data sets that can be "linked" via a variety of different mechanisms and also data sets that include institutional and state and local policies and procedures. A team-based approach to data science is strongly encouraged and supported to achieve the goal of a sustainable, adaptable national shared data resource
    corecore