Men's information-seeking behavior regarding cancer risk and screening: A meta-narrative systematic review

Objective: Preventive strategies are known to reduce cancer risk and incidence and improve prognosis. Men seldom seek medical information about cancer prevention and risk reduction. The aim of this meta‐narrative systematic review was to critically appraise evidence from qualitative, quantitative, and mixed‐methods studies that explored men's information‐seeking behaviors in relation to cancer prevention and risk reduction. // Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Education Full Text, and ERIC were systematically searched for studies published in English between January 1, 2006 and May 30, 2016. A total of 4117 titles were identified; of which, 31 studies were included (21 qualitative studies, 9 quantitative studies, and 1 mixed‐methods study). The methodological quality of the studies was appraised by using different tools. // Results: Most studies focused on screening for prostate (n = 18) and colorectal cancer (n = 7). Most men were passive information‐gatherers rather than active information‐seekers. Key sources of information included the Internet for active information‐seekers and health care professionals for passive information‐gatherers. Barriers to information‐seeking included information overload, embarrassment, and fear. Low literacy and health literacy levels were addressed in 3 studies and were identified as impediments to active information‐seeking. Facilitators to information‐seeking included family support, media, celebrity endorsements, and targeted information. // Conclusions: Men's information‐seeking behavior regarding cancer risk reduction, prevention, and screening is influenced by several factors. This necessitates targeted interventions aimed at raising awareness of cancer prevention and screening, while accounting for men's informational needs, preferred learning strategies, and literacy levels

Expanding the Interdisciplinary Palliative Medicine Workforce: A Longitudinal Education and Mentoring Program for Practicing Clinicians.

Coleman Foundatio

Effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke (FOCUS): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

Background Results of small trials indicate that fluoxetine might improve functional outcomes after stroke. The FOCUS trial aimed to provide a precise estimate of these effects. Methods FOCUS was a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial done at 103 hospitals in the UK. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, had a clinical stroke diagnosis, were enrolled and randomly assigned between 2 days and 15 days after onset, and had focal neurological deficits. Patients were randomly allocated fluoxetine 20 mg or matching placebo orally once daily for 6 months via a web-based system by use of a minimisation algorithm. The primary outcome was functional status, measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), at 6 months. Patients, carers, health-care staff, and the trial team were masked to treatment allocation. Functional status was assessed at 6 months and 12 months after randomisation. Patients were analysed according to their treatment allocation. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN83290762. Findings Between Sept 10, 2012, and March 31, 2017, 3127 patients were recruited. 1564 patients were allocated fluoxetine and 1563 allocated placebo. mRS data at 6 months were available for 1553 (99·3%) patients in each treatment group. The distribution across mRS categories at 6 months was similar in the fluoxetine and placebo groups (common odds ratio adjusted for minimisation variables 0·951 [95% CI 0·839–1·079]; p=0·439). Patients allocated fluoxetine were less likely than those allocated placebo to develop new depression by 6 months (210 [13·43%] patients vs 269 [17·21%]; difference 3·78% [95% CI 1·26–6·30]; p=0·0033), but they had more bone fractures (45 [2·88%] vs 23 [1·47%]; difference 1·41% [95% CI 0·38–2·43]; p=0·0070). There were no significant differences in any other event at 6 or 12 months. Interpretation Fluoxetine 20 mg given daily for 6 months after acute stroke does not seem to improve functional outcomes. Although the treatment reduced the occurrence of depression, it increased the frequency of bone fractures. These results do not support the routine use of fluoxetine either for the prevention of post-stroke depression or to promote recovery of function. Funding UK Stroke Association and NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme

Planarized and nanopatterned mesoporous silica thin films by chemical-mechanical polishing of gap-filled topographically patterned substrates

Nanopatterning of mesoporous silica thin films is achieved by a simple chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) process. Mesoporous silica thin films are deposited onto topographically patterned (rectangular cross-section channels) silicon substrates so that good gap fill is achieved within the topography. The straight-etched channels promote the ordering of the mesopores along the length of the channel. CMP can then be used to successfully remove excess film above the channels from the mesas, to leave only the material within the channels, without disrupting pore order. These results indicate the robustness of these mesoporous materials to damage during the CMP process making the prospect of integrating these materials into advanced circuitry a possibility

Multi-modality imaging in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: intermodal discrepancies in key prognostic parameters

Abstract Background/Introduction Multi-modality imaging is crucial for confirming diagnosis and assessing prognosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, inter-modality discrepancies in key parameters are commonly reported. Purpose To assess real-world inter-modal reporting discrepancies between transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in the measurement of four key parameters in HCM patients. Methods Consecutive HCM patients with TTE and CMR performed within 6 months of each other at a tertiary centre were retrospectively assessed for reported maximum wall thickness (MWT), left atrial diameter (LAd), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and presence of left ventricular apical aneurysm (LVAA). The CMR report was considered gold standard. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR) as appropriate. Results 353 consecutive HCM patients (72% male, median age 60.9 years, IQR 49.8–71.6 years) with TTE and CMR within 6 months (median difference 1.7 months, IQR 1.1–3.4 months) were assessed between 4th January 2018 and 9th April 2019. Of 284 patients with paired MWT data, median difference was 0.0 mm (IQR −1.0 to 3.0 mm, p=0.02), likely representing a difference in distributions of MWT. TTE both over and underestimated MWT (in 36% and 46% cases respectively). Of the 94 patients with paired LAd data, mean difference was 0.4±5.7 mm (95% CI −0.8010 to 1.546, p=0.5). N=320 patients with paired LVEF data (after excluding patients with atrial fibrillation (n=20)). Median difference in LVEF was 12% (IQR 5–19% p&amp;lt;0.0001). TTE underestimated LVEF in 88% of cases. CMR and TTE both identified 14 (5%) patients as having LVEF &amp;lt;50%. There were however 8 cases of disagreement in classification of LVEF &amp;lt;50%, due to over (n=4) or underestimation (n=4) by TTE. LVAA was accurately identified by TTE in only 9/30 (30%) of those patients with demonstrable LVAA by CMR (p=0.0008). TTE evidence of a discreet apical chamber (paradoxical jet on spectral or colour Doppler) was present in 16/21 (76%) cases where TTE failed to overtly identify LVAA. However, apical or mid-cavity obliteration was reported in 15/21 (71%) cases where TTE failed to identify LVAA. Conclusion(s) Echocardiography and CMR measurements are often used interchangeably in clinical practice but inter-modality discrepancies can affect diagnosis and sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk assessment. This is particularly important for binary risk factors such as LVEF&amp;lt;50% or LVAA which are considered major SCD risk factors in the latest American Heart Association guidelines. 25 (7%) patients in our cohort had major risk factors identified by CMR that were not identified on TTE. CMR is an important, recommended tool where TTE imaging is suboptimal, but attention to more subtle elements of abnormal intracavity blood flow may be able to increase LVAA detection during TTE. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. </jats:sec