Patient-centred measurement in ophthalmology – a paradigm shift

Ophthalmologists and researchers in ophthalmology understand what a rapidly evolving field ophthalmology is, and that to conduct good research it is essential to use the latest and best methods. In outcomes research, one modern initiative has been to conduct holistic measurement of outcomes inclusive of the patient's point of view; patient-centred outcome. This, of course, means including a questionnaire. However, the irony of trying to improve outcomes research by being inclusive of many measures is that the researcher may not be expert in all measures used. Certainly, few people conducting outcomes research in ophthalmology would claim to be questionnaire experts. Most tend to be experts in their ophthalmic subspecialty and probably simply choose a popular questionnaire that appears to fit their needs and think little more about it. Perhaps, unlike our own field, we assume that the field of questionnaire research is relatively stable. This is far from the case. The measurement of patient-centred outcomes with questionnaires is a rapidly evolving field. Indeed, over the last few years a paradigm shift has occurred in patient-centred measurement

Rasch Analysis of the Upper-Limb Sub-scale of the STREAM Tool in an Acute Stroke Population

Background – Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide. The most common impairment resulting from stroke is upper limb weakness. Objectives - To determine the usefulness and psychometric validity of the upper limb sub-scale of the STREAM in an acute stroke population. Methods: Rasch Analysis, including unidimensionality assumption testing, determining model fit, and analysis of: reliability, residual correlations, & differential item functioning. Results - 125 individuals were assessed using the upper limb sub-scale of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) tool. Rasch analysis suggests the STREAM is a unidimensional measure. However, when scored using the originally proposed method (0-2), or using the response pattern (0-5) neither variant fit the Rasch model (p < 0.05). Although, the reliability was good (Person-Separation Index – 0.847 & 0.903 respectively). Correcting for the disordered thresholds, and thereby producing the new scoring pattern, led to substantial improvement in the overall fit (chi-square probability of fit - 22%), however, the reliability was slightly reduced (PSI – 0.806). Conclusions - The study proposes a new scoring method for the upper limb sub-scale of the STREAM outcome measure in the acute stroke population.Stroke Associatio