Comparaison des différentes stratégies de prises en charge de la grossesse extra-utérine

An ectopic pregnancy is a pregnancy implanted outside uterine cavity. There are four different treatments to manage tubal ectopic pregnancy: expectation, medical treatment (methotrexate), conservative surgery (salpingotomy) and radical surgery (salpingectomy). The choice between these different treatments is based on feasibility criteria (medical treatment and expectation are not feasible in case of tubal rupture). These feasibility criteria can be summarized by activity of ectopic pregnancy. This activity allowed differentiating less active ectopic pregnancies that can be supported by medical treatment and active ectopic pregnancies that required surgery.All of these treatments present advantages and disadvantages and the major unresolved issue concerns subsequent fertility after management of ectopic pregnancy. Randomized trial DEMETER has thus been designed to evaluate a difference of 20% between medical management and conservative surgery for less active ectopic pregnancy and between conservative and radical surgery for active ectopic pregnancy. Differences for two years subsequent fertility after management of ectopic pregnancy were not more than 20% between medical management and conservative surgery for less active ectopic pregnancy as between conservative and radical surgery for active ectopic pregnancy. This trial also allowed concluding to the superiority of conservative surgery with a systematic postoperative injection of methotrexate compared to medical treatment for management of less active ectopic pregnancy. This superiority might be enhanced by postoperative methotrexate injection. The conversion rate to radical surgery when a conservative surgery is decided is important: 10% for less active ectopic pregnancy and 21% (significantly higher) for active ectopic pregnancy. Recovery time is shorter after conservative surgery compared to medical management.Results of DEMETER trial and literature review allowed giving guidelines for management of ectopic pregnancy. Less active ectopic pregnancy with hCG rate less than 5.000UI/l without tubal rupture or hemodynamic failure can be managed in first intention by medical treatment (methotrexate) if the women is assiduous to a close check. However, conservative surgery for less active ectopic pregnancy is a good option. A systematic postoperative injection of methotrexate in the 24 first hours after surgery should be recommended. Active ectopic pregnancy has to be managed surgically and decision between conservative and radical surgery should be done in the operative room. Finally, women have to be informed about the absence of difference between treatments for subsequent fertility.Une grossesse extra-utérine est une grossesse implantée en dehors de la cavité utérine. Il existe quatre thérapeutiques pour leur prise en charge : l’expectative, le traitement médical par méthotrexate, le traitement chirurgical conservateur (salpingotomie) et le traitement chirurgical radical (salpingectomie). Le choix entre ces 4 traitements repose tout d’abord sur des critères de faisabilité (traitement médical et expectative sont par exemple exclus en cas de rupture tubaire). Ces critères de faisabilité peuvent être résumés par la notion d’activité de la GEU. Cette notion permet de différencier les grossesses extra-utérines peu actives pouvant bénéficier d’un traitement médical des grossesses extra-utérines actives requérant un traitement chirurgical.Chaque traitement présente des avantages et des inconvénients et la principale question toujours en suspens concerne la fertilité après prise en charge d’une GEU. L’essai randomisé DEMETER a donc été conçu pour évaluer l’existence éventuelle d’une différence de fertilité de plus de 20% entre traitement médical et traitement chirurgical conservateur d’une part pour les GEU peu actives et entre traitement chirurgical conservateur et radical d’autre part pour les GEU actives.Il n’y a pas de différence significative de plus de 20% de fertilité deux ans après la prise en charge d’une grossesse extra-utérine que ce soit pour les grossesses peu actives entre traitement médical et traitement chirurgical conservateur ou pour les grossesses actives entre traitement chirurgical conservateur et radical. Par ailleurs, cet essai a aussi permis de conclure à la supériorité, en terme d’échec immédiat, du traitement chirurgical conservateur avec injection postopératoire de méthotrexate par rapport au traitement médical pour la prise en charge des GEU peu actives. La plus grande efficacité du traitement chirurgical conservateur est probablement majorée par l’injection postopératoire de méthotrexate. Le taux de conversion d’un traitement chirurgical conservateur vers un traitement chirurgical radical est important : 10% dans le groupe des GEU peu actives et 21% (significativement plus élevé) dans le groupe des GEU actives. Enfin, Le délai de guérison est plus court après traitement chirurgical conservateur qu’après traitement médical.Ces résultats couplés aux données de la littérature permettent d’élaborer des recommandations sur la prise en charge des grossesses extra-utérines. Notamment, pour les GEU peu actives avec un taux d’hCG inférieur à 5000UI/ml sans signe de rupture tubaire ou de défaillance hémodynamique, un traitement médical par méthotrexate doit être proposé sous réserve d’une bonne compliance de la patiente pour le suivi. Une prise en charge par chirurgie conservatrice reste une option valide. Dans ce cas, une injection postopératoire de méthotrexate sera réalisée systématiquement dans les 24 heures suivant l’intervention. Le traitement des GEU actives est chirurgical et la décision entre conservateur et radical a lieu en peropératoire. Enfin, une information aux patientes pourra être délivrée sur l’absence de différence de fertilité 2 ans après le traitement d’une GEU

Improvements in Fluid Structure Interaction simulations of LS-Dyna(r)

International audienceThe French Ministry of Defence’s procurement agency, the Direction Générale de l'Armement (DGA), is in charge of assessing and testing armament systems in order to equip the armed forces and prepare for the future. DGA Aeronautical Systems, the technical centre dedicated to evaluate and test aircraft, combines test and evaluation to clear, among others, parachute systems. The parachute evaluation is historically based on experimental data and so requires numerous flight tests which can prove expensive and time consuming. In order to have a greater understanding of the parachute dynamic behavior and to optimize the parachute systems flight tests, DGA Aeronautical Systems developed a modeling and simulation capability as a support to evaluation. For this purpose, DGA Aeronautical Systems, with the help of ISAE, developed Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) simulations of parachutes using the LS-Dyna commercial Finite Element Analysis (FEA) tool. This tool is largely used for solving highly nonlinear transient problems and enables doing coupled multi-physics simulations such as FSI simulations. DGA Aeronautical Systems has been using the software since 2003. In the recent years, the parachute simulation has been much improved thanks to the implementation of a porosity algorithm in LS-Dyna at the common request of DGA and parachute industry. The paper presents recent improvements in Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) techniques used to analyze the canopy inflation and the quasi-steady state descent phases characteristics. Up to now, only infinite mass type simulations were developed by constraining the parachute confluence point and applying a prescribed airflow to the fluid. The applied airflow velocity came from real in-flight measurements of paratrooper or load trajectory determinations. This simulation type is representative to wind tunnel tests. From now on, thanks to considerable computational resources, finite mass type simulations are also possible. It consists in applying the force of gravity to the parachute system. This allows simulating both the inflation phase (from vertical packed parachute geometry) and the quasi-steady state descent. Among others, the static line parachute of the new French Army troop parachute system called EPC (Ensemble de Parachutage du Combattant) was modeled at real scale. Modeling techniques are presented and results of the EPC static line parachute simulation are compared with real inflight measurements. The benefits of FSI simulations prior to parachute testing are presented. In a near future, incompressible and compressible Navier-Stokes solvers will be available in the next version of LS-Dyna. These code enhancements will be tested to simulate the parachute flight and hopefully will bring the ability to analyze more accurately the aerodynamics of the canopy and the structural behavior of the fabrics. These future capabilities are also discussed

The Egypt labor market panel survey: introducing the 2012 round

This paper introduces the 2012 round of the Egypt Labor Market Panel Survey (ELMPS), a publicly-available nationally representative longitudinal household survey. We describe the key characteristics of the ELMPS, including the samples and questionnaires for each round. Additionally, we examine the attrition processes observed in the panel and discuss the creation of weights to correct for attrition. We compare our data to other statistical sources for Egypt to evaluate the sample's representativeness. To demonstrate how the ELMPS allows for an improved understanding of the labor market, we compare unemployment trends using the ELMPS and other data on unemployment in Egypt

A protocol for developing a core outcome set for ectopic pregnancy

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ectopic pregnancy have reported many different outcomes, which are themselves often defined and measured in distinct ways. This level of variation results in an inability to compare results of individual RCTs. The development of a core outcome set to ensure outcomes important to key stakeholders are collected consistently will guide future research in ectopic pregnancy. STUDY AIM: To develop and implement a core outcome set to guide future research in ectopic pregnancy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We have established an international steering group of key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, researchers, and individuals with lived experience of ectopic pregnancy. We will identify potential outcomes from ectopic pregnancy from a comprehensive literature review of published randomised controlled trials. We will then utilise a modified Delphi method to prioritise outcomes. Subsequently, key stakeholders will be invited to score potential core outcomes on a nine-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not important) to 9 (critical). Repeated reflection and rescoring should promote whole and individual stakeholder group convergence towards consensus ‘core’ outcomes. We will also establish standardised definitions and recommend high-quality measurements for individual core outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: COMET 1492. Registered in November 2019

Do Surgeons Anticipate Women’s Hopes and Fears Associated with Prolapse Repair? A Qualitative Analysis in the PROSPERE Trial

Women’s preoperative perceptions of pelvic-floor disorders may differ from those of their physicians. Our objective was to specify women’s hopes and fears before cystocele repair, and to compare them to those that surgeons anticipate. We performed a secondary qualitative analysis of data from the PROSPERE trial. Among the 265 women included, 98% reported at least one hope and 86% one fear before surgery. Sixteen surgeons also completed the free expectations-questionnaire as a typical patient would. Women’s hopes covered seven themes, and women’s fears eleven. Women’s hopes were concerning prolapse repair (60%), improvement of urinary function (39%), capacity for physical activities (28%), sexual function (27%), well-being (25%), and end of pain or heaviness (19%). Women’s fears were concerning prolapse relapse (38%), perioperative concerns (28%), urinary disorders (26%), pain (19%), sexual problems (10%), and physical impairment (6%). Surgeons anticipated typical hopes and fears which were very similar to those the majority of women reported. However, only 60% of the women reported prolapse repair as an expectation. Women’s expectations appear reasonable and consistent with the scientific literature on the improvement and the risk of relapse or complication related to cystocele repair. Our analysis encourages surgeons to consider individual woman’s expectations before pelvic-floor repair

Is vulnerability to climate change gendered? And how? Insights from Egypt

Most climate change literature tends to downplay the gendered nature of vulnerability. At best, gender is discussed in terms of the male-female binary, seen as opposing forces rather than in varying relations of interdependency. Such construction can result in the adoption of maladaptive culturally unfit gender-blind policy and interventions. In Egypt, which is highly vulnerable to climate change, gender analysis of vulnerability is almost non-existent. This paper addresses this important research gap by asking and drawing on a rural Egyptian context ‘How do the gendered relational aspects of men’s and women’s livelihoods in the household and community influence vulnerability to climate change?’. To answer this question, I draw on gender analysis of social relations, framed within an understanding of sustainable livelihoods. During 16 months of fieldwork, I used multiple ethnographic methods to collect data from two culturally and ethnically diverse low-income villages in Egypt. My main argument is that experiences of climate change are closely intertwined with gender and wider social relations in the household and community. These are shaped by local gendered ideologies and cultures that are embedded in conjugal relations, kinship and relationship to the environment, as compared across the two villages. In this paper, I strongly argue that vulnerability to climate change is highly gendered and therefore gender analysis should be at the heart of climate change discourses, policy and interventions

Comparison of Different Managements of Ectopic Pregnancy

Une grossesse extra-utérine est une grossesse implantée en dehors de la cavité utérine. Il existe quatre thérapeutiques pour leur prise en charge : l’expectative, le traitement médical par méthotrexate, le traitement chirurgical conservateur (salpingotomie) et le traitement chirurgical radical (salpingectomie). Le choix entre ces 4 traitements repose tout d’abord sur des critères de faisabilité (traitement médical et expectative sont par exemple exclus en cas de rupture tubaire). Ces critères de faisabilité peuvent être résumés par la notion d’activité de la GEU. Cette notion permet de différencier les grossesses extra-utérines peu actives pouvant bénéficier d’un traitement médical des grossesses extra-utérines actives requérant un traitement chirurgical.Chaque traitement présente des avantages et des inconvénients et la principale question toujours en suspens concerne la fertilité après prise en charge d’une GEU. L’essai randomisé DEMETER a donc été conçu pour évaluer l’existence éventuelle d’une différence de fertilité de plus de 20% entre traitement médical et traitement chirurgical conservateur d’une part pour les GEU peu actives et entre traitement chirurgical conservateur et radical d’autre part pour les GEU actives.Il n’y a pas de différence significative de plus de 20% de fertilité deux ans après la prise en charge d’une grossesse extra-utérine que ce soit pour les grossesses peu actives entre traitement médical et traitement chirurgical conservateur ou pour les grossesses actives entre traitement chirurgical conservateur et radical. Par ailleurs, cet essai a aussi permis de conclure à la supériorité, en terme d’échec immédiat, du traitement chirurgical conservateur avec injection postopératoire de méthotrexate par rapport au traitement médical pour la prise en charge des GEU peu actives. La plus grande efficacité du traitement chirurgical conservateur est probablement majorée par l’injection postopératoire de méthotrexate. Le taux de conversion d’un traitement chirurgical conservateur vers un traitement chirurgical radical est important : 10% dans le groupe des GEU peu actives et 21% (significativement plus élevé) dans le groupe des GEU actives. Enfin, Le délai de guérison est plus court après traitement chirurgical conservateur qu’après traitement médical.Ces résultats couplés aux données de la littérature permettent d’élaborer des recommandations sur la prise en charge des grossesses extra-utérines. Notamment, pour les GEU peu actives avec un taux d’hCG inférieur à 5000UI/ml sans signe de rupture tubaire ou de défaillance hémodynamique, un traitement médical par méthotrexate doit être proposé sous réserve d’une bonne compliance de la patiente pour le suivi. Une prise en charge par chirurgie conservatrice reste une option valide. Dans ce cas, une injection postopératoire de méthotrexate sera réalisée systématiquement dans les 24 heures suivant l’intervention. Le traitement des GEU actives est chirurgical et la décision entre conservateur et radical a lieu en peropératoire. Enfin, une information aux patientes pourra être délivrée sur l’absence de différence de fertilité 2 ans après le traitement d’une GEU.An ectopic pregnancy is a pregnancy implanted outside uterine cavity. There are four different treatments to manage tubal ectopic pregnancy: expectation, medical treatment (methotrexate), conservative surgery (salpingotomy) and radical surgery (salpingectomy). The choice between these different treatments is based on feasibility criteria (medical treatment and expectation are not feasible in case of tubal rupture). These feasibility criteria can be summarized by activity of ectopic pregnancy. This activity allowed differentiating less active ectopic pregnancies that can be supported by medical treatment and active ectopic pregnancies that required surgery.All of these treatments present advantages and disadvantages and the major unresolved issue concerns subsequent fertility after management of ectopic pregnancy. Randomized trial DEMETER has thus been designed to evaluate a difference of 20% between medical management and conservative surgery for less active ectopic pregnancy and between conservative and radical surgery for active ectopic pregnancy. Differences for two years subsequent fertility after management of ectopic pregnancy were not more than 20% between medical management and conservative surgery for less active ectopic pregnancy as between conservative and radical surgery for active ectopic pregnancy. This trial also allowed concluding to the superiority of conservative surgery with a systematic postoperative injection of methotrexate compared to medical treatment for management of less active ectopic pregnancy. This superiority might be enhanced by postoperative methotrexate injection. The conversion rate to radical surgery when a conservative surgery is decided is important: 10% for less active ectopic pregnancy and 21% (significantly higher) for active ectopic pregnancy. Recovery time is shorter after conservative surgery compared to medical management.Results of DEMETER trial and literature review allowed giving guidelines for management of ectopic pregnancy. Less active ectopic pregnancy with hCG rate less than 5.000UI/l without tubal rupture or hemodynamic failure can be managed in first intention by medical treatment (methotrexate) if the women is assiduous to a close check. However, conservative surgery for less active ectopic pregnancy is a good option. A systematic postoperative injection of methotrexate in the 24 first hours after surgery should be recommended. Active ectopic pregnancy has to be managed surgically and decision between conservative and radical surgery should be done in the operative room. Finally, women have to be informed about the absence of difference between treatments for subsequent fertility