Infinite computations with random oracles

We consider the following problem for various infinite time machines. If a real is computable relative to large set of oracles such as a set of full measure or just of positive measure, a comeager set, or a nonmeager Borel set, is it already computable? We show that the answer is independent from ZFC for ordinal time machines (OTMs) with and without ordinal parameters and give a positive answer for most other machines. For instance, we consider, infinite time Turing machines (ITTMs), unresetting and resetting infinite time register machines (wITRMs, ITRMs), and \alpha-Turing machines for countable admissible ordinals \alpha

Reachability for infinite time Turing machines with long tapes

Infinite time Turing machine models with tape length $\alpha$, denoted $T_\alpha$, strengthen the machines of Hamkins and Kidder [HL00] with tape length $\omega$. A new phenomenon is that for some countable ordinals $\alpha$, some cells cannot be halting positions of $T_\alpha$ given trivial input. The main open question in [Rin14] asks about the size of the least such ordinal $\delta$. We answer this by providing various characterizations. For instance, $\delta$ is the least ordinal with any of the following properties: (a) For some $\xi<\alpha$, there is a $T_\xi$-writable but not $T_\alpha$-writable subset of $\omega$. (b) There is a gap in the $T_\alpha$-writable ordinals. (c) $\alpha$ is uncountable in $L_{\lambda_\alpha}$. Here $\lambda_\alpha$ denotes the supremum of $T_\alpha$-writable ordinals, i.e. those with a $T_\alpha$-writable code of length $\alpha$. We further use the above characterizations, and an analogue to Welch's submodel characterization of the ordinals $\lambda$, $\zeta$ and $\Sigma$, to show that $\delta$ is large in the sense that it is a closure point of the function $\alpha \mapsto \Sigma_\alpha$, where $\Sigma_\alpha$ denotes the supremum of the $T_\alpha$-accidentally writable ordinals

Canonical Truth

We introduce and study a notion of canonical set theoretical truth, which means truth in a `canonical model', i.e. a transitive class model that is uniquely characterized by some $\in$-formula. We show that this notion of truth is `informative', i.e. there are statements that hold in all canonical models but do not follow from ZFC, such as Reitz' ground model axiom or the nonexistence of measurable cardinals. We also show that ZF+$V=L[\mathbb{R}]$+AD has no canonical models. On the other hand, we show that there are canonical models for `every real has sharp'. Moreover, we consider `theory-canonical' statements that only fix a transitive class model of ZFC up to elementary equivalence and show that it is consistent relative to large cardinals that there are theory-canonical models with measurable cardinals and that theory-canonicity is still informative in the sense explained above