Influence of limestone on the hydration of ternary slag cement

The hydration kinetics, microstructure and pore solution composition of ternary slag-limestone cements have been investigated. Commercial CEM I 52.5 R was blended with slag and limestone; maintaining a clinker to SCM ratio of 50:50 with up to 20% slag replaced by limestone. The sulphate content was maintained at 3% in all composite systems. Hydration was followed by a combination of isothermal calorimetry, chemical shrinkage, scanning electron microscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. The hydration of slag was followed by the implementation of QXRD/PONKCS method. The accuracy of the calibrated PONKCS phase was assessed on slag and corundum mixes of varying ratios, at different w/s ratios. Thus, the method was used to analyse hydrated cements without dehydrating the specimens. The results show that the presence of limestone enhanced both clinker and slag hydration. The pore volume and pore solution chemistry were further examined to clarify to the synergistic effects. The nucleation effects account for enhanced clinker hydration while the space available for hydrate growth plus lowering of the aluminium concentration in the pore solution led to the improved slag hydration

Changing the Allocation Rules in the EU ETS: Impact on Competitiveness and Economic Efficiency

We assess five proposals for the future of the EU greenhouse gas Emission Trading Scheme (ETS): pure grandfathering allocation of emission allowances (GF), output-based allocation (OB), auctioning (AU), auctioning with border adjustments (AU-BA), and finally output-based allocation in sectors exposed to international competition combined with auctioning in electricity generation (OB-AU). We look at the impact on production, trade, CO2 leakage and welfare. We use a partial equilibrium model of the EU 27 featuring three sectors covered by the EU ETS - cement, steel and electricity - plus the aluminium sector, which is indirectly impacted through a rise in electricity price. The leakage ratio, i.e. the increase in emissions abroad over the decrease in EU emissions, ranges from around 8% under GF and AU to -2% under AU-BA and varies greatly among sectors. Concerning the overall economic cost, OB appears to be the least efficient policy, even when taking into account its ability to prevent CO2 leakage. On the other hand, this policy minimises production losses and wealth transfers among stakeholders, which is likely to soften oppositions. GF and AU are the most efficient policies from an EU perspective, even when leakage is accounted for. From a world welfare perspective and whatever the emission reduction, AU-BA is the least costly policy, while OB-AU, AU and GF entail similar costs