5 research outputs found

    Telepsychiatry: Advancing Mental Health Support through Evolving Paradigms

    No full text
    Telemedicine has revolutionized the healthcare landscape, offering numerous advantages such as cost-effectiveness, convenience, and reduced infection risks. The editorial aims to highlight the potential concern of telehealth in exacerbating psychiatric conditions. While telemedicine has its merits, the importance of in-person doctor-patient relationships cannot be understated. The bond formed in face-to-face settings fosters trust, empathy, and understanding, which are crucial in supporting patients during vulnerable moments. Limitations of telepsychiatry, including the challenge of capturing non-verbal cues and prompt crisis management, are explored. Socioeconomic disparities, privacy issues, and limited access to reliable internet connections further add to the complexity of telepsychiatric care. To enhance telepsychiatry, hybrid models of care are proposed, combining in-person and telemedicine consultations to establish trust and maintain continuity of care. Innovative approaches, such as Good Psychiatric Management (GPM), Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS), and Mentalization-Based Therapy (MBT), have emerged, addressing the limitations of telemedicine. GPM's emphasis on closely monitoring patients' progress and incorporating psychopharmacological interventions and psychotherapy makes it well-suited for telepsychiatry. CAMS stands out in crisis management, and MBT's focus on enhancing interpersonal skills is valuable in maintaining meaningful connections with patients. Telemedicine offers significant potential in psychiatry, but balancing medical advancements and preserving the human element of care is essential. Policymakers and healthcare professionals must prioritize establishing trusting relationships in face-to-face consultations while leveraging telemedicine for follow-up care. By skillfully integrating telemedicine and evidence-based treatment approaches, we can enhance patient outcomes and maintain the crucial human touch in mental health care.https://psyarxiv.com/vua9x

    Morbidity and Mortality of COVID in Relation to Age, Sex and BMI

    No full text
    The United States (US) has been the epicenter of the Coronavirus disease pandemic (COVID-19). The underrepresented minorities which tend to have a higher prevalence of obesity are affected disproportionately. The objective of this study was to assess the early outcomes and characteristics of COVID-19 patients in the US and also investigate whether age, gender, and obesity are associated with worse outcomes. To determine the effect of body mass index, sex, and age on risk for morbidity and mortality of COVID-19. Compressive systematic research was conducted to pool every relevant article that evaluated COVID’s effect on patients with regard to BMI, age, sex, and mortality. Search for articles was conducted in the most widely-used databases such as PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Search terms used for article retrieval included: “BMI,” OR “Obesity,” OR “BMI,” OR “Sex,” OR “Age.” AND “COVID-19 related mortality.” Severe obesity, male sex, and increasing age are associated with a high rate of in-hospital mortality and generally, worse in-hospital prognosis.  </jats:p
    corecore