Neutralizing antibodies explain the poor clinical response to Interferon beta in a small proportion of patients with Multiple Sclerosis: a retrospective study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against Interferon beta (IFNβ) are reported to be associated with poor clinical response to therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. We aimed to quantify the contribution of NAbs to the sub-optimal response of IFNβ treatment.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We studied the prevalence of NAbs in MS patients grouped according to their clinical response to IFNβ during the treatment period. Patients were classified as: group A, developing ≥ 1 relapse after the first 6 months of therapy; group B, exhibiting confirmed disability progression after the first 6 months of therapy, with or without superimposed relapses; group C, presenting a stable disease course during therapy. A cytopathic effect assay tested the presence of NAbs in a cohort of ambulatory MS patients treated with one of the available IFNβ formulations for at least one year. NAbs positivity was defined as NAbs titre ≥ 20 TRU.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Seventeen patients (12.1%) were NAbs positive. NAbs positivity correlated with poorer clinical response (<it>p </it>< 0.04). As expected, the prevalence of NAbs was significantly lower in Group C (2.1%) than in Group A (17.0%) and Group B (17.0%). However, in the groups of patients with a poor clinical response (A, B), NAbs positivity was found only in a small proportion of patients.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The majority of patients with poor clinical response are NAbs negative suggesting that NAbs explains only partially the sub-optimal response to IFNβ.</p

Early high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: A successful recovery

We describe a patient with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) who was treated with high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone 2 days after onset of neurologic symptoms. Despite poor prognostic factors and extensive white matter lesions, the patient recovered dramatically with no need for maintenance steroid therapy. This case report of fulminant ADEM treated successfully with early high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone, although uncontrolled, suggests that this agent should be studied in other cases.</jats:p

Sclérose en plaques : peut-on interférer ?

Le récent développement de différents traitements immunomodulateurs dans la sclérose en plaques (SEP) a permis une meilleure compréhension de cette affection, tout en révélant sa complexité et les limites de ces thérapies. Les interférons- et l'acétate de glatiramère ont un effet, variable selon le type de SEP, sur la fréquence des poussées et pour certains, sur la progression des déficits neurologiques, La reconnaissance, en plus du caractère démyélinisant de la SEP, d'une atteinte de l'axone pouvant survenir dès le début de la SEP et responsable du développement de déficits neurologiques irréversibles implique de nouvelles attitudes thérapeutiques

Traitements immunomodulateurs/ suppresseurs en neurologie. [Immunomodulatory/suppressive treatments in neurology]

Immunomodulatory/suppressive treatments are frequently used in neurological disorders affecting the central and peripheral nervous system. Demyelinating disorders are a good example of a wide application of the various types of existing therapies. Although these therapies are still mostly not disease specific, their combination with more targeted molecules appears most relevant for diseases with multiple pathogenic mechanisms

Autoanticorps en neurologie: implications cliniques [Autoantibodies in neurological diseases: clinical implications]

Autoantibodies are defined as antibodies directed against self antigens, i.e., against a normal antigenic endogenous tissue constituent. They can be the immediate cause of the neurological syndrome or be detected as an epiphenomenon of the pathogenic process. Autoantibodies are often considered useful biomarkers for the improvement of diagnostic accuracy, for the staging of disease progression or for the follow up of a biological response to a therapeutic intervention. The purpose of this article is to review the autoantibodies that are available to investigate immune-mediated neurological conditions. The detection of some of these autoantibodies may help the clinician to establish a definite diagnosis which may further facilitate the therapeutic decision