International Variation in Severe Exacerbation Rates in Patients With Severe Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Exacerbation frequency strongly influences treatment choices in patients with severe asthma. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the extent of the variability of exacerbations rate across countries and its implications in disease management? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrieved data from the International Severe Asthma Registry, an international observational cohort of patients with a clinical diagnosis of severe asthma. We identified patients ≥ 18 years of age who did not initiate any biologics prior to baseline visit. A severe exacerbation was defined as the use of oral corticosteroids for ≥ 3 days or asthma-related hospitalization/ED visit. A series of negative binomial models were applied to estimate country-specific severe exacerbation rates during 365 days of follow-up, starting from a naïve model with country as the only variable to an adjusted model with country as a random-effect term and patient and disease characteristics as independent variables. RESULTS: The final sample included 7,510 patients from 17 countries (56% from the United States), contributing to 1,939 severe exacerbations (0.27/person-year). There was large between-country variation in observed severe exacerbation rate (minimum, 0.04 [Argentina]; maximum, 0.88 [Saudi Arabia]; interquartile range, 0.13-0.54), which remained substantial after adjusting for patient characteristics and sampling variability (interquartile range, 0.16-0.39). INTERPRETATION: Individuals with similar patient characteristics but coming from different jurisdictions have varied severe exacerbation risks, even after controlling for patient and disease characteristics. This suggests unknown patient factors or system-level variations at play. Disease management guidelines should recognize such between-country variability. Risk prediction models that are calibrated for each jurisdiction will be needed to optimize treatment strategies

Disease Burden and Access to Biologic Therapy in Patients with Severe Asthma, 2017–2022: An Analysis of the International Severe Asthma Registry

Tham T Le,1 David B Price,2– 4 Clement Erhard,5 Bill Cook,6 Anna Quinton,7 Rohit Katial,8 George C Christoff,9 Luis Perez-de-Llano,10 Alan Altraja,11,12 Celine Bergeron,13 Arnaud Bourdin,14 Mariko Siyue Koh,15,16 Lauri Lehtimäki,17,18 Bassam Mahboub,19 Nikolaos G Papadopoulos,20,21 Paul Pfeffer,22,23 Chin Kook Rhee,24 Victoria Carter,2,3 Neil Martin,25,26 Trung N Tran1 On behalf of the EVEREST Study Working Group1BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 2Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore; 3Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, UK; 4Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; 5BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK; 6Respiratory and Immunology, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 7BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK; 8Global Medical Respiratory, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 9Faculty of Public Health, Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria; 10Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain; 11Department of Pulmonology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; 12Lung Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia; 13Centre for Lung Health, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 14PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; 15Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; 16Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; 17Allergy Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; 18Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland; 19Rashid Hospital, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; 20Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; 21Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece; 22Department of Respiratory Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; 23Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; 24Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea; 25Respiratory and Immunology, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK; 26University of Leicester, Leicester, UKCorrespondence: Trung N Tran, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, Respiratory and Immunology, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, Email [email protected]: Patients with severe asthma may be prescribed biologic therapies to improve disease control. The EVEREST study aimed to characterize the global disease burden of patients with severe asthma without access to biologics and those who have access but do not receive biologics, as well as the remaining unmet need despite use of these therapies.Methods: This was a historical cohort study of patients with severe asthma (aged ≥ 18 years) in the International Severe Asthma Registry receiving Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2018 step 5 treatment, or with uncontrolled disease at GINA step 4. Prospective data on patient clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and medication use over a 12-month period between December 2017 and May 2022 were assessed for the following five groups: biologics accessible (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, or dupilumab); biologics inaccessible; biologics accessible but not received; biologics accessible and received; and biologic recipients whose asthma remained suboptimally controlled.Results: Overall, 9587 patients from 21 countries were included. Among patients in the biologics accessible (n=5073), biologics inaccessible (n=3041), and biologics accessible but not received (n=382) groups, 41.4%, 18.7%, and 49.6% experienced at least two exacerbations, 11.5%, 10.5%, and 6.2% required at least one hospitalization, 47.9%, 54.6%, and 71.2% had uncontrolled asthma, and 23.9%, 8.6%, and 11.0% received long-term oral corticosteroids (LTOCS), respectively. Following biologic therapy, among patients who received biologics overall (n=2666) and among those whose asthma remained suboptimally controlled (n=1780), 19.1% and 23.0% experienced at least two exacerbations, 2.7% and 2.9% required at least one hospitalization, and 16.7% and 22.0% received LTOCS, respectively.Conclusion: There is a substantial disease burden in both patients without access to biologics and those with access who do not receive these therapies, although specific outcomes may vary between these groups. There also remains a high unmet need among biologic recipients, many of whom have a suboptimal response to treatment.Keywords: biologic, disease burden, healthcare resource utilization, severe asthm

The Function and Organization of Lateral Prefrontal Cortex: A Test of Competing Hypotheses

The present experiment tested three hypotheses regarding the function and organization of lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC). The first account (the information cascade hypothesis) suggests that the anterior-posterior organization of lateral PFC is based on the timing with which cue stimuli reduce uncertainty in the action selection process. The second account (the levels-of-abstraction hypothesis) suggests that the anterior-posterior organization of lateral PFC is based on the degree of abstraction of the task goals. The current study began by investigating these two hypotheses, and identified several areas of lateral PFC that were predicted to be active by both the information cascade and levels-of-abstraction accounts. However, the pattern of activation across experimental conditions was inconsistent with both theoretical accounts. Specifically, an anterior area of mid-dorsolateral PFC exhibited sensitivity to experimental conditions that, according to both accounts, should have selectively engaged only posterior areas of PFC. We therefore investigated a third possible account (the adaptive context maintenance hypothesis) that postulates that both posterior and anterior regions of PFC are reliably engaged in task conditions requiring active maintenance of contextual information, with the temporal dynamics of activity in these regions flexibly tracking the duration of maintenance demands. Activity patterns in lateral PFC were consistent with this third hypothesis: regions across lateral PFC exhibited transient activation when contextual information had to be updated and maintained in a trial-by-trial manner, but sustained activation when contextual information had to be maintained over a series of trials. These findings prompt a reconceptualization of current views regarding the anterior-posterior organization of lateral PFC, but do support other findings regarding the active maintenance role of lateral PFC in sequential working memory paradigms

Exploring Definitions and Predictors of Severe Asthma Clinical Remission Post-Biologic in Adults.

RATIONALE: There is no consensus on criteria to include in an asthma remission definition in real-life. Factors associated with achieving remission post-biologic-initiation remain poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the proportion of adults with severe asthma achieving multi-domain-defined remission post-biologic-initiation and identify pre-biologic characteristics associated with achieving remission which may be used to predict it. METHODS: This was a longitudinal cohort study using data from 23 countries from the International Severe Asthma Registry. Four asthma outcome domains were assessed in the 1-year pre- and post-biologic-initiation. A priori-defined remission cut-offs were: 0 exacerbations/year, no long-term oral corticosteroid (LTOCS), partly/well-controlled asthma, and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second ≥80%. Remission was defined using 2 (exacerbations + LTOCS), 3 (+control or +lung function) and 4 of these domains. The association between pre-biologic characteristics and post-biologic remission was assessed by multivariable analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 50.2%, 33.5%, 25.8% and 20.3% of patients met criteria for 2, 3 (+control), 3 (+lung function) and 4-domain-remission, respectively. The odds of achieving 4-domain remission decreased by 15% for every additional 10-years asthma duration (odds ratio: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.00). The odds of remission increased in those with fewer exacerbations/year, lower LTOCS daily dose, better control and better lung function pre-biologic-initiation. CONCLUSIONS: One in 5 patients achieved 4-domain remission within 1-year of biologic-initiation. Patients with less severe impairment and shorter asthma duration at initiation had a greater chance of achieving remission post-biologic, indicating that biologic treatment should not be delayed if remission is the goal. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Comparative effectiveness of Anti-IL5 and Anti-IgE biologic classes in patients with severe asthma eligible for both.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe asthma may present with characteristics representing overlapping phenotypes, making them eligible for more than one class of biologic. Our aim was to describe the profile of adult patients with severe asthma eligible for both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R and to compare the effectiveness of both classes of treatment in real life. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study that included adult patients with severe asthma from 22 countries enrolled into the International Severe Asthma registry (ISAR) who were eligible for both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R. The effectiveness of anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R was compared in a 1:1 matched cohort. Exacerbation rate was the primary effectiveness endpoint. Secondary endpoints included long-term-oral corticosteroid (LTOCS) use, asthma-related emergency room (ER) attendance, and hospital admissions. RESULTS: In the matched analysis (n = 350/group), the mean annualized exacerbation rate decreased by 47.1% in the anti-IL5/5R group and 38.7% in the anti-IgE group. Patients treated with anti-IL5/5R were less likely to experience a future exacerbation (adjusted IRR 0.76; 95% CI 0.64, 0.89; p < 0.001) and experienced a greater reduction in mean LTOCS dose than those treated with anti-IgE (37.44% vs. 20.55% reduction; p = 0.023). There was some evidence to suggest that patients treated with anti-IL5/5R experienced fewer asthma-related hospitalizations (IRR 0.64; 95% CI 0.38, 1.08), but not ER visits (IRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61, 1.43). CONCLUSIONS: In real life, both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R improve asthma outcomes in patients eligible for both biologic classes; however, anti-IL5/5R was superior in terms of reducing asthma exacerbations and LTOCS use

Global variability in administrative approval prescription criteria for biologic therapy in severe asthma

Background Regulatory bodies have approved five biologics for severe asthma. However, regional differences in accessibility may limit the global potential for personalized medicine. Objective To compare global differences in ease of access to biologics. Methods In April 2021, national prescription criteria for omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab were reviewed by severe asthma experts collaborating in the International Severe Asthma Registry. Outcomes (per country, per biologic) were (1) country-specific prescription criteria and (2) development of the Biologic Accessibility Score (BACS). The BACS composite score incorporates 10 prescription criteria, each with a maximum score of 10 points. Referenced to European Medicines Agency marketing authorization specifications, a higher score reflects easier access. Results Biologic prescription criteria differed substantially across 28 countries from five continents. Blood eosinophil count thresholds (usually ≥300 cells/μL) and exacerbations were key requirements for anti-IgE/anti–IL-5/5R prescriptions in around 80% of licensed countries. Most countries (40% for dupilumab to 54% for mepolizumab) require two or more moderate or severe exacerbations, whereas numbers ranged from none to four. Moreover, 0% (for reslizumab) to 21% (for omalizumab) of countries required long-term oral corticosteroid use. The BACS highlighted marked between-country differences in ease of access. For omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab, only two, one, four, and seven countries, respectively, scored equal or higher than the European Medicines Agency reference BACS. For reslizumab, all countries scored lower. Conclusions Although some differences were expected in country-specific biologic prescription criteria and ease of access, the substantial differences found in the current study present a challenge to implementing precision medicine across the world

Biomarker-defined clusters by level of Type 2 inflammatory involvement in severe asthma

Introduction/Background: Biomarker-defined clusters of severe asthma patients were previously identified via hierarchical cluster analysis; a cluster of older females with low-to-medium Type 2 (T2) biomarkers was characterized (Denton, E. et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2021;9:2680-8.e7). Aims and Objectives: To describe biomarker-defined clusters (blood eosinophil counts [BEC], FeNO, and serum IgE [IgE]) in severe asthma patients, and characterize T2-low asthma using a model-based approach to clustering. Methods: Patients in the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR) with biomarker data were included, regardless of biologic use. A Gaussian finite mixture model was used to perform cluster analyses using BEC, FeNO and IgE standardized by z score. The prespecified thresholds for low biomarkers were BEC <300cells/µL, FeNO <25ppb and IgE <75 IU/mL. Results: Of 4459 patients, five clusters were identified. Cluster 1 had females with low T2 biomarkers. Cluster 2 had high BEC and FeNO; Cluster 3, triple T2 biomarker high; Cluster 4, high BEC; Cluster 5, high IgE. Figure: Median (IQR) biomarker levels and characteristics of clusters. Conclusions: In line with previous findings, a cluster with females and low biomarkers suggested low T2 involvement. The other 4 clusters varied in biomarker elevations, highlighting the complexity of T2 inflammatory involvement in severe asthma.No Full Tex