Sixty-four multislice computed tomography after transcutaneous implantation of a Cribier-Edwards bioprosthesis in the aortic position.

International audienc

Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: immediate results and 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate

AbstractObjectives. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the immediate results and the 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis.Background. Despite excellent immediate and mid-term results, 20% to 30% of patients with coronary stent implantation will present an angiographic restenosis and may require additional treatment. The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis is still unclear.Methods. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analyses were performed before and after stent implantation, before and after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis and on a 6-month systematic coronary angiogram to assess the recurrent angiographic restenosis rate.Results. Balloon angioplasty was performed in 52 patients presenting in-stent restenosis. In-stent restenosis was either diffuse (≥ 10 mm) inside the stent (71%) or focal (29%). Mean stent length was 16 ± 7 mm. Balloon diameter of 2.98 ± 0.37 mm and maximal inflation pressure of 10 ± 3 atm were used for balloon angioplasty. Angiographic success rate was 100% without any complication. Acute gain was lower after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis than after stent implantation: 1.19 ± 0.60 mm vs. 1.75 ± 0.68 mm (p = 0.0002). At 6-month follow-up, 60% of patients were asymptomatic and no patient died. Eighteen patients (35%) had repeat target vessel revascularization. Angiographic restenosis rate was 54%. Recurrent restenosis rate was higher when in-stent restenosis was diffuse: 63% vs. 31% when focal, p = 0.046.Conclusions. Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis can be safely and successfully performed, it leads to less immediate stenosis improvement than at time of stent implantation and carries a high recurrent angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months, in particular in diffuse in-stent restenosis lesions

[Indications for MRI in coronary disease]

International audienceMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a useful, even essential, examination in recent years, for the exploration of patients with coronary disease. MRI has several different roles, even though it remains insufficiently requested because insufficiently available. Today it is the reference examination for assessing indicators of ventricular function (volume, ejection fraction, ventricular mass); their prognostic value and importance in determining treatment are well recognized. In the postinfarction period, MRI using late enhancement techniques allows a precise analysis of the extent of necrosis, in terms of segments and transmural involvement. MRI is indicated, especially preoperatively, in cases of ventricular remodeling and its consequences (functional impairment, aneurysms, parietal thrombus). MRI with pharmacological stress may also be used as a tool for detecting myocardial ischemia; in this case, perfusion or first-pass sequences should be used. On the other hand, cardiac MRI for morphologic exploration of the coronary network and measurement of stenosis is not yet routine