Whole-Inactivated and Virus-Like Particle Vaccine Strategies for Chikungunya Virus

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a global public health threat, having been identified in >60 countries in Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas. There is no cure for or licensed vaccine against CHIKV infection. Initial attempts at CHIKV vaccine development began in the early 1960s. Whole-inactivated and virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines are 2 of the current approaches being evaluated. Success of these approaches is dependent on a safe, well-tolerated vaccine that is immunogenic and deployable in regard to manufacturing, stability, and delivery characteristics

P525 Rheumatoid arthritis treatment with filgotinib: Week 156 safety and efficacy data from a phase 2b open-label extension study

Abstract Background Filgotinib (FIL) is an oral, selective Janus kinase inhibitor, shown to be effective and well tolerated in patients (pt) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory diseases (IBD/AS/PsA). DARWIN 3, an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension of phase 2b studies evaluates the longer-term safety and efficacy of FIL in RA. Methods The study evaluated pt outcomes for methotrexate (MTX) inadequate responders completing the 24-week DARWIN 1 (FIL+MTX) and DARWIN 2 (FIL monotherapy) studies. We present an interim analysis at week 156 following FIL 200 or 100 mg/day treatment. Event rate: total events/total years of exposure of FIL; Exposure: until data cut-off in patients on the study at the time of analysis. Results Eight hundred and seventy-seven patients completed the parent studies. Seven hundred and thirty-nine enrolled in DARWIN 3 (497 DARWIN 1, 242 DARWIN 2); most DARWIN 1 and 2 patients were female (81.5%, 81.8%), white (75.3%, 74.8%); mean age was 53 and 52 years, respectively. Mean baseline MTX dose in the FIL+MTX group: 16.8mg/week. At week 156, 59.9% of patients remained on study. Most common reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (26.5%) and subject request (9.1%). Total exposure to FIL was 2203 pt-years; mean exposure ± standard deviation (SD): 3.04 ± 1.22 years for FIL+MTX and 2.86 ± 1.21 years for FIL monotherapy. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs): 419 (84.3%) patients on FIL+MTX and 203 (83.9%) patients on FIL monotherapy; serious TEAEs occurred in 45 (9.1%) and 33 (13.6%), respectively. Adverse event of special interest (AESI) rates remained low at week 156 (Table 1). Grade ≥3 toxicities in &amp;gt;1% of patients were decreased lymphocytes (4.2%/1%), decreased neutrophils (1.0/1.2%), increased fasting triglycerides (2.2/0%) and decreased fasting triglycerides (0/3.3%) for FIL+MTX/FIL monotherapy respectively. 5 deaths occurred (FIL+MTX: 2, FIL monotherapy: 3) none after week 132. Clinical efficacy was shown at week 156 in both FIL+MTX and FIL monotherapy groups, using observed cases as measured by ACR20 (87.2% and 89.7%)/ACR50 (72.4 and 63.0)/ACR70 (45.5 and 40.0) DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2 (69.0 and 64.7) and DAS28(CRP) &amp;lt;2.6 (53.4 and 45.6). Conclusion FIL was generally well tolerated; no new safety signals emerged. No safety differences observed in patients receiving FIL+MTX or FIL monotherapy. Efficacy was sustained up to week 156 in both treatment groups. </jats:sec

Pluridisciplinary programmes for innovation: Realities and limits of a promising form of learning

International audienceHigher education has adopted an innovation imperative that has driven significant transformations in the sector. A new kind of learning programme, based on problem-solving, design thinking, creativity and “pluridisciplinarity” has emerged in the last two decades and become an emblematic form of learning to cope with current “complex” economic and societal problems by examining their roots at ground level. The French case study allows one to understand the distance between general policy orientations for innovation and actors' capacity and the need to take into account the local context