176 research outputs found

    How to Display Group Information on Node-Link Diagrams: An Evaluation

    Get PDF
    We present the results of evaluating four techniques for displaying group or cluster information overlaid on node-link diagrams: node coloring, GMap, BubbleSets, and LineSets. The contributions of the paper are three fold. First, we present quantitative results and statistical analyses of data from an online study in which approximately 800 subjects performed 10 types of group and network tasks in the four evaluated visualizations. Specifically, we show that BubbleSets is the best alternative for tasks involving group membership assessment; that visually encoding group information over basic node-link diagrams incurs an accuracy penalty of about 25 percent in solving network tasks; and that GMap's use of prominent group labels improves memorability. We also show that GMap's visual metaphor can be slightly altered to outperform BubbleSets in group membership assessment. Second, we discuss visual characteristics that can explain the observed quantitative differences in the four visualizations and suggest design recommendations. This discussion is supported by a small scale eye-tracking study and previous results from the visualization literature. Third, we present an easily extensible user study methodology

    Fauxvea: Crowdsourcing Gaze Location Estimates for Visualization Analysis Tasks

    Get PDF
    We present the design and evaluation of a method for estimating gaze locations during the analysis of static visualizations using crowdsourcing. Understanding gaze patterns is helpful for evaluating visualizations and user behaviors, but traditional eye-tracking studies require specialized hardware and local users. To avoid these constraints, we developed a method called Fauxvea, which crowdsources visualization tasks on the Web and estimates gaze fixations through cursor interactions without eye-tracking hardware. We ran experiments to evaluate how gaze estimates from our method compare with eye-tracking data. First, we evaluated crowdsourced estimates for three common types of information visualizations and basic visualization tasks using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). In another, we reproduced findings from a previous eye-tracking study on tree layouts using our method on MTurk. Results from these experiments show that fixation estimates using Fauxvea are qualitatively and quantitatively similar to eye tracking on the same stimulus-task pairs. These findings suggest that crowdsourcing visual analysis tasks with static information visualizations could be a viable alternative to traditional eye-tracking studies for visualization research and design

    SEVERAL ISSUES REGARDING THE CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION OF VULNERABLE PSAMMOPHYLOUS SPECIES POLYGONUM MARITIMUML. AND SILENE THYMIFOLIASIBTH. ET SM. AT THE ROMANIAN BLACK SEA COAST

    Get PDF
    The phenomenon of vegetation dynamics and the fragile balance of the coastalecosystems and also the large number of endangered plant species from these areas represent a permanent challenge to which many specialists have to respond. In this paper we present some issues regarding the ecology, chorology, current conservation status of the species populations within their specific habitats related to the main factors of anthropic and natural impact that affect the populations of the studied plant species and identification and description of measures that can betaken for their conservation and protection. By means of the results obtain through out this study, we present the current status of Polygonum maritimum and Silene thymifolia, as well as their habitats, specific to the Romanian Black Sea coastal area

    Revisited experimental comparison of node-link and matrix representations

    Get PDF
    Visualizing network data is applicable in domains such as biology, engineering, and social sciences. We report the results of a study comparing the effectiveness of the two primary techniques for showing network data: node-link diagrams and adjacency matrices. Specifically, an evaluation with a large number of online participants revealed statistically significant differences between the two visualizations. Our work adds to existing research in several ways. First, we explore a broad spectrum of network tasks, many of which had not been previously evaluated. Second, our study uses a large dataset, typical of many real-life networks not explored by previous studies. Third, we leverage crowdsourcing to evaluate many tasks with many participants
    corecore