9,690 research outputs found
That Some of Sol Lewitt's Later Wall Drawings Aren't Wall Drawings
Sol LeWitt is probably most famous for wall drawings. They are an extension of work he had done in sculpture and on paper, in which a simple rule specifies permutations and variations of elements. With wall drawings, the rule is given for marks to be made on a wall. We should distinguish these algorithmic works from impossible-to-implement instruction works and works realized by following preparatory sketches. Taking the core feature of a wall drawing to be that it is algorithmic, some of LeWitt's later works are wall drawings in name only
Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science
This paper gives a characterization of distributed cognition (d-cog) and explores ways that the framework might be applied in studies of science. I argue that a system can only be given a d-cog description if it is thought of as performing a task. Turning our attention to science, we can try to give a global d-cog account of science or local d-cog accounts of particular scientific projects. Several accounts of science can be seen as global d-cog accounts: Robert Merton's sociology of scientific norms, Philip Kitcher's 20th-century account of cognitive labor, and Kitcher's 21st-century notion of well-ordered science. Problems that arise for them arise just because of the way that they attribute a function to science. The paper concludes by considering local d-cog accounts. Here, too, the task is the crux of the matter
Science, Values, and the Priority of Evidence
It is now commonly held that values play a role in scientific judgment, but many arguments for that conclusion are limited. First, many arguments do not show that values are, strictly speaking, indispensable. The role of values could in principle be filled by a random or arbitrary decision. Second, many arguments concern scientific theories and concepts which have obvious practical consequences, thus suggesting or at least leaving open the possibility that abstruse sciences without such a connection could be value-free. Third, many arguments concern the role values play in inferring from evidence, thus taking evidence as given. This paper argues that these limitations do not hold in general. There are values involved in every scientific judgment. They cannot even conceivably be replaced by a coin toss, they arise as much for exotic as for practical sciences, and they are at issue as much for observation as for explicit inference
Miracles, Trust, and Ennui in Barnes’ Predictivism
Eric Barnes’ The Paradox of Predictivism is concerned primarily with two facts: predictivism and pluralism. In the middle part of the book, he peers through these two lenses at the tired realist scarecrow of the no-miracles argument. He attempts to reanimate this weatherworn realist argument, contra suggestions by people like me that it should be abandoned. In this paper, I want to get clear on Barnes’ contribution to the debate. He focuses on what he calls the miraculous endorsement argument, which explains not the success of a specific theory but instead the history of successes for an entire research program. The history of successes is explained by reliable and improving methods, which are the flipside of approximately true background theories. Yet, as Barnes notes, the whole story must begin with methods that are at least minimally reliable. Barnes demands that the realist explain the origin of the minimally reliable take-off point, and he suggests a way that the realist might do so. I contend that his explanation still relies on contingent developments and so fails to completely explain the development of take-off theories. However, this line of argument digs into familiar details of the no-miracles argument and overlooks what’s new in Barnes’ approach. By calling attention to pluralism, he reminds us that we need an account of scientific expertise. This is important, I suggest, because expertise is not indefinite. We do not trust specific experts for everything, but only for things within the bounds of their expertise. Drawing these boundaries relies on our own background theories and is only likely to be reliable if our background theories are approximately true. I argue, then, that pluralism gives us reason to be realists
That Some of Sol Lewitt's Later Wall Drawings Aren't Wall Drawings
Sol LeWitt is probably most famous for wall drawings. They are an extension of work he had done in sculpture and on paper, in which a simple rule specifies permutations and variations of elements. With wall drawings, the rule is given for marks to be made on a wall. We should distinguish these algorithmic works from impossible-to-implement instruction works and works realized by following preparatory sketches. Taking the core feature of a wall drawing to be that it is algorithmic, some of LeWitt's later works are wall drawings in name only
An analogue of the Magnus problem for associative algebras
We prove an analogue of the Magnus theorem for associative algebras without
unity over arbitrary fields. Namely, if an algebra is given by n+k generators
and k relations and has an n-element system of generators, then this algebra is
a free algebra of rank n
Judging Covers
Cover versions form a loose but identifiable category of tracks and performances. We distinguish four kinds of covers and argue that they mark important differences in the modes of evaluation that are possible or appropriate for each: mimic covers, which aim merely to echo the canonical track; rendition covers, which change the sound of the canonical track; transformative covers, which diverge so much as to instantiate a distinct, albeit derivative song; and referential covers, which not only instantiate a distinct song, but for which the new song is in part about the original song. In order to allow for the very possibility of transformative and referential covers, we argue that a cover is characterized by relation to a canonical track rather than merely by being a new instance of a song that had been recorded previousl
Distributed Collision-Free Motion Coordination on a Sphere: A Conic Control Barrier Function Approach
This letter studies a distributed collision avoidance control problem for a group of rigid bodies on a sphere. A rigid body network, consisting of multiple rigid bodies constrained to a spherical surface and an interconnection topology, is first formulated. In this formulation, it is shown that motion coordination on a sphere is equivalent to attitude coordination on the 3-dimensional Special Orthogonal group. Then, an angle-based control barrier function that can handle a geodesic distance constraint on a spherical surface is presented. The proposed control barrier function is then extended to a relative motion case and applied to a collision avoidance problem for a rigid body network operating on a sphere. Each rigid body chooses its control input by solving a distributed optimization problem to achieve a nominal distributed motion coordination strategy while satisfying constraints for collision avoidance. The proposed collision-free motion coordination law is validated via simulation
Characterization of the complex ion dynamics in lithium silicate glasses via computer simulations
We present results of molecular dynamics simulations on lithium metasilicate
over a broad range of temperatures for which the silicate network is frozen in
but the lithium ions can still be equilibrated. The lithium dynamics is studied
via the analysis of different correlation functions. The activation energy for
the lithium mobility agrees very well with experimental data. The correlation
of the dynamics of adjacent ions is weak. At low temperatures the dynamics can
be separated into local vibrational dynamics and hopping events between
adjacent lithium sites. The derivative of the mean square displacement displays
several characteristic time regimes. They can be directly mapped onto
respective frequency regimes for the conductivity. In particular it is possible
to identify time regimes dominated by localized dynamics and long-range
dynamics, respectively. The question of time-temperature superposition is
discussed for the mean square displacement and the incoherent scattering
function.Comment: to be published in Phys. Chem. Chem. Phy
Gaussian process models for periodicity detection
We consider the problem of detecting and quantifying the periodic component
of a function given noise-corrupted observations of a limited number of
input/output tuples. Our approach is based on Gaussian process regression which
provides a flexible non-parametric framework for modelling periodic data. We
introduce a novel decomposition of the covariance function as the sum of
periodic and aperiodic kernels. This decomposition allows for the creation of
sub-models which capture the periodic nature of the signal and its complement.
To quantify the periodicity of the signal, we derive a periodicity ratio which
reflects the uncertainty in the fitted sub-models. Although the method can be
applied to many kernels, we give a special emphasis to the Mat\'ern family,
from the expression of the reproducing kernel Hilbert space inner product to
the implementation of the associated periodic kernels in a Gaussian process
toolkit. The proposed method is illustrated by considering the detection of
periodically expressed genes in the arabidopsis genome.Comment: in PeerJ Computer Science, 201
- …
