Simple thoracostomy in prehospital trauma management is safe and effective: A 2-year experience by helicopter emergency medical crews

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and potential complications of simple thoracostomy, as first described by Deakin, as a method for prehospital treatment of traumatic pneumothorax. METHODS: Prospective observational study of all severe trauma patients rescued by our Regional Helicopter Emergency Medical Service and treated with on-scene simple thoracostomy, over a period of 25 months, from June 1, 2002 to June 30, 2004. RESULTS: Fifty-five consecutive severely injured patients with suspected pneumothorax and an average Revised Trauma Score of 9.6\ub12.7 underwent field simple thoracostomy. Oxygen saturation significantly improved after the procedure (from 86.4\ub110.2% to 98.5%\ub14.7%, P<0.05). No difference exists in the severity of thoracic lesions between patients with systolic arterial pressure and oxygen saturation below and above or equal to 90. A pneumothorax or a haemopneumothorax was found in 91.5% of the cases and a haemothorax in 5.1%. No cases of major bleeding, lung laceration or pleural infection were recorded. No cases of recurrent tension pneumothorax were observed. Forty (72.7%) patients survived to hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital treatment of traumatic pneumothorax by simple thoracostomy without chest tube insertion is a safe and effective technique. \ua9 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Influence of prehospital treatment on the outcome of patients with severe blunt traumatic brain injury: a single-centre study

Aim, patients, and methods To compare retrospectively the outcomes of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (Injury Severity Score, ISS total Z15; the Abbreviated ISS-head, aISShead Z9) admitted to our Intensive Care Unit by helicopter (helicopter emergency medical service, HEMS group= 89) with those transported by ambulance (GROUND group= 105) from January 2002 to December 2007. Results The groups were comparable for age, Glasgow Coma Scale, ISS total, and aISShead. The preadmission time of the HEMS group was significantly longer as compared with the GROUND group, but the interval from admission to definitive care was significantly shorter. In the prehospital phase, HEMS patients were more aggressively treated, as indicated by a significantly greater number of procedures performed (i.e. tracheal intubation and positioning of intravenous lines) and larger volumes of fluids infused. The overall mortality was lower in the HEMS than in the GROUND patients (21 vs. 25% respectively, P< 0.05). The survival with or without only minor neurological disabilities was higher in the HEMS than in the GROUND group (54 vs. 44% respectively, P< 0.05); among the survivors, the rate of severe neurological disabilities was lower in the HEMS than in the GROUND group (25 vs. 31%, P < 0.05). Conclusion In our experience, aggressive early treatment of patients with severe traumatic brain injury was associated with a better outcome likely because of the prevention of secondary brain injury and a shorter interval elapsing from the trauma to definitive care despite more time spent on the scene by the intervening team. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 16:312\u2013317 c 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Kreislaufstillstand in besonderen Situationen

Truhlář A, Deakin CD, Soar J, et al. Kreislaufstillstand in besonderen Situationen. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin. 2015;18(8):833-903