Conservative versus invasive strategy in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the international POPular age registry

This registry assessed the impact of conservative and invasive strategies on major adverse clinical events (MACE) in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Patients aged ≥75 years with NSTEMI were prospectively registered from European centers and followed up for one year. Outcomes were compared between conservative and invasive groups in the overall population and a propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort. MACE included cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndrome, and stroke. The study included 1190 patients (median age 80 years, 43% female). CAG was performed in 67% (N = 798), with two-thirds undergoing revascularization. Conservatively treated patients had higher baseline risk. After propensity score matching, 319 patient pairs were successfully matched. MACE occurred more frequently in the conservative group (total population 20% vs. 12%, adjHR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37–0.77, p = 0.001), remaining significant in the PSM cohort (18% vs. 12%, adjHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31–0.81, p = 0.004). In conclusion, an early invasive strategy was associated with benefits over conservative management in elderly patients with NSTEMI. Risk factors associated with ischemia and bleeding should guide strategy selection rather than solely relying on age

External validation of PRECISE-DAPT score and PARIS bleeding risk score in a real-world cohort of patients with acute coronary syndrome

Abstract Background In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) shortened duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) should be considered in those at high risk of bleeding. Risk scores may be used to assess the bleeding risk, but their predictive value remains unclear. Purpose To externally validate and compare the PRECISE-DAPT and the PARIS bleeding risk scores in patients with ACS. Methods From January 2015 to June 2018, all patients admitted with ACS were consecutively included in a single center, observational, prospective registry with follow-up of at least one year. In all patients, the PRECISE-DAPT and the PARIS risk-score were retrospectively assessed. Primary endpoint was moderate or severe bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 or 5 bleeding within one year after ACS. Kaplan-Meier curves showed the probabilty of bleeding during follow-up as assessed by both scores. Score discrimination using c-statistic were calculated and calibration curves were visually assessed. Results 2,729 patients were included for analysis. 93.6% were discharged with ≥2 antithrombotic drugs. At one year follow-up, the event rate of moderate or severe bleeding was 5.5%. High bleeding risk as stratified by both risk scores was associated with higher bleeding rates. Discriminative values for BARC 3 or 5 bleeding at one year were 0.67 [95% CI 0.61–0.72] for the PRECISE-DAPT score and 0.62 [95% CI 0.57–0.68] for the PARIS bleeding score (p=0.31). Conclusion The PRECISE-DAPT and the PARIS bleeding scores both showed adequate discriminative performances in predicting moderate or severe bleeding in this study. Kaplan-meier and ROC-curves Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None </jats:sec

The current treatment and predictors of outcome in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in an all comers population: the POPular Age registry

Abstract Background Elderly patients form a large and growing part of the patients presenting with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Choosing the optimal antithrombotic treatment in these elderly patients is more complicated because they frequently have characteristics indicating both a high ischaemic and high bleeding risk. Purpose We describe the treatment of elderly patients (&amp;gt;75 years) admitted with NSTEMI, present the outcomes (major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding) and aim to find predictors for adverse events. Methods The POPular AGE registry is an investigator initiated, prospective, observational, multicentre study of patients aged 75 years or older presenting with NSTEMI. Patients were recruited between August 1st, 2016 and May 7th, 2018 at 21 sites in the Netherlands. The primary composite endpoint of MACE included cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke at one-year follow-up. Results A total of 757 patients were enrolled. During hospital stay 76% underwent coronary angiography, 34% percutaneous coronary intervention and 12% coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). At discharge 78.6% received aspirin (non-users mostly because of the combination of oral anticoagulant and clopidogrel), 49.7% were treated with clopidogrel, 34.2% with ticagrelor and 29.6% were prescribed oral anticoagulation. Eighty-three percent of patients received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or dual therapy consisting of oral anticoagulation and at least one antiplatelet agent for a duration of 12 months. At one year, the primary outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke occurred in 12.3% of patients and major bleeding (BARC 3 or 5) occurred in 4.8% of the patients. The risk of MACE and major bleeding was highest during the first month and stayed high over time for MACE while the risk for major bleeding levelled off. Independent predictors for MACE were age, renal function, medical history of CABG, stroke and diabetes. The only independent predictor for major bleeding was haemoglobin level on admission. Conclusion In this all-comers registry, most elderly patients (≥75 years) with NSTEMI are treated with DAPT and undergoing coronary angiography the same way as younger NSTEMI patients from the SWEDEHEART registry. Aspirin use was lower as was the use of the more potent P2Y12 inhibitors compared to the SWEDEHEART which is very likely due to the concomitant use of oral anticoagulation in 30% of patients. The fact that ischemic risk stays constant over 1 year of follow-up, while the bleeding risk levels off after one month may suggest the need of dual antiplatelet therapy until at least one year after NSTEMI. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): AstraZeneca </jats:sec