3,040 research outputs found

    Interference Mitigation Through Limited Receiver Cooperation: Symmetric Case

    Full text link
    Interference is a major issue that limits the performance in wireless networks, and cooperation among receivers can help mitigate interference by forming distributed MIMO systems. The rate at which receivers cooperate, however, is limited in most scenarios. How much interference can one bit of receiver cooperation mitigate? In this paper, we study the two-user Gaussian interference channel with conferencing decoders to answer this question in a simple setting. We characterize the fundamental gain from cooperation: at high SNR, when INR is below 50% of SNR in dB scale, one-bit cooperation per direction buys roughly one-bit gain per user until full receiver cooperation performance is reached, while when INR is between 67% and 200% of SNR in dB scale, one-bit cooperation per direction buys roughly half-bit gain per user. The conclusion is drawn based on the approximate characterization of the symmetric capacity in the symmetric set-up. We propose strategies achieving the symmetric capacity universally to within 3 bits. The strategy consists of two parts: (1) the transmission scheme, where superposition encoding with a simple power split is employed, and (2) the cooperative protocol, where quantize-binning is used for relaying.Comment: To appear in IEEE Information Theory Workshop, Taormina, October 2009. Final versio

    Interference Mitigation through Limited Transmitter Cooperation

    Full text link
    Interference limits performance in wireless networks, and cooperation among receivers or transmitters can help mitigate interference by forming distributed MIMO systems. Earlier work shows how limited receiver cooperation helps mitigate interference. The scenario with transmitter cooperation, however, is more difficult to tackle. In this paper we study the two-user Gaussian interference channel with conferencing transmitters to make progress towards this direction. We characterize the capacity region to within 6.5 bits/s/Hz, regardless of channel parameters. Based on the constant-to-optimality result, we show that there is an interesting reciprocity between the scenario with conferencing transmitters and the scenario with conferencing receivers, and their capacity regions are within a constant gap to each other. Hence in the interference-limited regime, the behavior of the benefit brought by transmitter cooperation is the same as that by receiver cooperation.Comment: Submitted to Special Issue of the IEEE Transactions on Information Theory on Interference Networks

    A tool for metadata analysis

    Get PDF
    We describe a Web-based metadata quality tool that provides statistical descriptions and visualisations of Dublin Core metadata harvested via the OAI protocol. The lightweight nature of development allows it to be used to gather contextualized requirements and some initial user feedback is discussed

    Interference Mitigation Through Limited Receiver Cooperation

    Full text link
    Interference is a major issue limiting the performance in wireless networks. Cooperation among receivers can help mitigate interference by forming distributed MIMO systems. The rate at which receivers cooperate, however, is limited in most scenarios. How much interference can one bit of receiver cooperation mitigate? In this paper, we study the two-user Gaussian interference channel with conferencing decoders to answer this question in a simple setting. We identify two regions regarding the gain from receiver cooperation: linear and saturation regions. In the linear region receiver cooperation is efficient and provides a degrees-of-freedom gain, which is either one cooperation bit buys one more bit or two cooperation bits buy one more bit until saturation. In the saturation region receiver cooperation is inefficient and provides a power gain, which is at most a constant regardless of the rate at which receivers cooperate. The conclusion is drawn from the characterization of capacity region to within two bits. The proposed strategy consists of two parts: (1) the transmission scheme, where superposition encoding with a simple power split is employed, and (2) the cooperative protocol, where one receiver quantize-bin-and-forwards its received signal, and the other after receiving the side information decode-bin-and-forwards its received signal.Comment: Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 69 pages, 14 figure

    Two-way Interference Channels

    Full text link
    We consider two-way interference channels (ICs) where forward and backward channels are ICs but not necessarily the same. We first consider a scenario where there are only two forward messages and feedback is offered through the backward IC for aiding forward-message transmission. For a linear deterministic model of this channel, we develop inner and outer bounds that match for a wide range of channel parameters. We find that the backward IC can be more efficiently used for feedback rather than if it were used for sending its own independent backward messages. As a consequence, we show that feedback can provide a net increase in capacity even if feedback cost is taken into consideration. Moreover we extend this to a more general scenario with two additional independent backward messages, from which we find that interaction can provide an arbitrarily large gain in capacity.Comment: submitted to the IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory 201

    LOCK CONGESTION AND ITS IMPACT ON GRAIN BARGE RATES ON THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER

    Get PDF
    An anticipated increase in lock delays on the upper Mississippi River has generated concern about its future navigational efficiency. The objective of this paper is to identify selected factors affecting lock delay on the River's busiest locks and to examine the impact of lock delay on grain barge rates. Results show that lock unavailability, traffic level, and delay at nearby locks affect lock delay. Further, barge rates are affected by lock delay, however, the impact is modest.Public Economics,
    corecore