Musculoskeletal Basics: The Shoulder and the Knee Workshop for Primary Care Residents

Introduction Although musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints are very common in ambulatory clinics, internal medicine residents report low confidence in performing MSK examinations and intra-articular steroid injections. Our goal is to strengthen residents' MSK competence by using visual, auditory, and kinesthetic educational modalities during an academic half-day session. Methods Our intervention was a workshop/academic half-day session that included multimodal educational materials on common shoulder and knee MSK complaints. The intervention featured a PowerPoint presentation highlighting three areas of MSK education: history taking, physical examination, and procedural skills. The curriculum contained a novel interactive charades game in which competitors demonstrated joint exams, an engaging anatomy quiz, and the performance of knee and subacromial bursae injections using interactive models and educational videos. Results The effectiveness of our session was measured using a pre- and postsurvey. In our 2017 resident survey to determine the level of comfort in performing knee and shoulder physical examination and intra-articular injections, the majority of respondents perceived themselves as inadequately trained. After the session, confidence in performing knee and shoulder examinations and in performing knee and subacromial bursae injections increased significantly. In addition, 100% of the residents who attended and evaluated the session either agreed or strongly agreed that the experience improved MSK knowledge and employed effective teaching strategies. Discussion The workshop/academic half-day session positively enhanced residents' perception of their knowledge of MSK medicine and their ability to perform joint injections

Designing Actionable Solutions and Curriculum for Pain Disparities Education

Abstract The Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) require medical schools to teach their students how to recognize and work toward eliminating health disparities. However, time constraints and a dearth of guidance for educators in teaching pain disparities curricula pose significant challenges. Herein we describe successes and lessons learned after designing, implementing, and evaluating an innovative pain disparities curriculum that was embedded in a longitudinal health equity curriculum for third year medical school students at an academic institution. Although the curriculum was developed for medical school students, the concepts may be broadly applicable to other training settings such as residency and fellowship programs.</jats:p

Effect of a Digital Health Intervention on Decreasing Barriers and Increasing Facilitators for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Patients

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, in part, because one third of Americans fail to get screened. In a prior randomized controlled trial, we found that an iPad patient decision aid called Mobile Patient Technology for Health-CRC (mPATH-CRC) doubled the proportion of patients who completed colorectal cancer screening. Methods: All data for the current analysis were collected as part of a randomized controlled trial to determine the impact of mPATH-CRC on receipt of colorectal cancer screening within 24 weeks. Participants were enrolled from six community-based primary care practices between June 2014 and May 2016 and randomized to either usual care or mPATH-CRC. Six potential mediators of the intervention effect on screening were considered. The Iacobucci method was used to assess the significance of the mediation. Results: A total of 408 patients had complete data for all potential mediators. Overall, the potential mediators accounted for approximately three fourths (76.3%) of the effect of the program on screening completion. Perceived benefits, self-efficacy, ability to state a screening decision, and patient–provider discussion were statistically significant mediators. Patient–provider discussion accounted for the largest proportion of the effect of mPATH-CRC (70.7%). Conclusions: mPATH-CRC increased completion of colorectal cancer screening by affecting patient-level and system-level mediators. However, the most powerful mediator was the occurrence of a patient–provider discussion about screening. Digital interventions like mPATH-CRC are an important adjunct to the patient–provider encounter. Impact: Understanding the factors that mediated mPATH-CRC's success is paramount to developing other effective interventions. </jats:sec