Eine Nase für 1000 Pfund : Burleske in einem Akt /

Mode of access: Internet

Superior semi-circular canal dehiscence syndrome: quantifying the effectiveness of treatment from the patient's perspective

AbstractBackgroundSuperior semi-circular canal dehiscence syndrome is a disorder characterised by auditory and vestibular symptoms that can significantly impact quality of life, and yet it has no disease-specific quality of life instrument.MethodThirty-six patients who underwent transmastoid superior semicircular canal resurfacing and plugging were included from an initial cohort of 60 surgically managed patients. A sub-cohort of 19 consecutive patients completed validated symptom and quality of life questionnaires before and after surgery. Of the 36 patients, 31 participated in a telephone semi-structured interview post-operatively.ResultsFollowing surgery, there was a statistically significant improvement in autophony index score (p = 0.02), symptom severity score (p &lt; 0.001) and sound hypersensitivity (p = 0.01). Thematic analysis of telephone interviews suggested three main symptom themes: auditory hypersensitivity, dysequilibrium, headache and concentration difficulties. Dysequilibrium was found to persist post-operatively.ConclusionSurgery improves overall symptoms and quality of life. However, important symptom themes may be overlooked using the outcome measures that are currently available. A unified disease-specific outcome measure is urgently required to better understand the impact of symptoms and measure treatment effects.</jats:sec

Penetrance of adrenocortical tumours associated with the germline TP53 R337H mutation

Background: An inherited germline P53 mutation has been identified in cases of childhood adrenocortical carcinoma (ACT), a neoplasm with a high incidence in southern Brazil. The penetrance of ACT in carriers of the point mutation, which encodes an arginine-to-histidine substitution at codon 337 of TP53 (R337H), has not been determined. Objective: To investigate the penetrance of childhood ACT in carriers of the R337H TP53 mutation. Methods: The family histories of 30 kindreds of 41 southern Brazilian children with ACT were obtained. A PCR based assay was used to detect this P53 mutation in a large number of relatives of children with ACT. In all, 927 individuals were tested for the mutation, 232 from the non-carrier and 695 (including the 40 probands) from the carrier parental lines. Results: 40 children with ACT carried the TP53 R337H mutation; the remaining child with ACT was not tested. There was no evidence of Li-Fraumeni syndrome in any of the kindreds; however, seven met the criteria for Li-Fraumeni-like syndrome. The carrier parental line was identified in each kindred. Of the 695 individuals tested in the carrier parental line, 240 (34.5%) were positive for the mutation, while none of the 232 individuals in the other parental line carried the mutation. The penetrance of ACT was 9.9% (95% confidence interval, 8.7% to 11.1%). Conclusions: The TP53 R337H mutation dramatically increases predisposition to childhood ACT but not to other cancers, and explains the increased frequency of ACT observed in this geographic region

Anticoagulation Timing in Acute Stroke With Atrial Fibrillation According to Chronic Kidney Disease: The OPTIMAS Trial

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of ischemic stroke (IS) and intracerebral hemorrhage, so the safety and efficacy of early direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) initiation in those with CKD are of clinical relevance. METHODS: OPTIMAS (Optimal Timing of Anticoagulation After Acute Ischemic Stroke With Atrial Fibrillation) was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label trial with blinded outcome assessment, recruiting patients with IS and atrial fibrillation from 100 UK hospitals between 2019 and 2024. Participants were randomized 1:1, stratified by stroke severity, to early (within 4 days of onset) or delayed (at days 7-14) DOAC initiation. CKD was defined as a past medical history of known CKD, collected according to trial protocol as part of the case report form. For this prespecified subgroup analysis, the trial cohorts were classified according to the presence or absence of CKD. Whether CKD modified the treatment effect of early DOAC initiation was determined by fitting mixed effects logistic regression models with interaction terms between CKD and treatment group. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of recurrent IS, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and systemic arterial embolism. Key secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: We included 3601 patients (mean age, 78±10 years; 45% female), 543 with CKD. There were 116 primary outcome events: 97 (3.2%) in the normal kidney function group and 19 (3.5%) in the CKD group. There was no difference between early and delayed DOAC initiation for the primary outcome in either the normal kidney function group (odds ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.67-1.51]) or the CKD group (odds ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.36-2.25]; Pinteraction=0.822). Similarly, for the secondary outcomes, we detected no modification of the treatment effect according to CKD (Pinteraction values of 0.637, 0.386, and 0.107 for IS, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that CKD does not modify the effects of early versus delayed DOAC initiation after acute IS. Based on these results, early DOAC initiation should not be withheld in patients with CKD

Optimal timing of anticoagulation after acute ischaemic stroke with atrial fibrillation (OPTIMAS): a multicentre, blinded-endpoint, phase 4, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of anticoagulation for patients with acute ischaemic stoke with atrial fibrillation is uncertain. We investigated the efficacy and safety of early compared with delayed initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We performed a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, parallel-group, phase 4, randomised controlled trial at 100 UK hospitals. Adults with atrial fibrillation and a clinical diagnosis of acute ischaemic stroke and whose physician was uncertain of the optimal timing for DOAC initiation were eligible for inclusion in the study. We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to early (ie, ≤4 days from stroke symptom onset) or delayed (ie, 7-14 days) anticoagulation initiation with any DOAC, using an independent online randomisation service with random permuted blocks and varying block length, stratified by stroke severity at randomisation. Participants and treating clinicians were not masked to treatment assignment, but all outcomes were adjudicated by a masked independent external adjudication committee using all available clinical records, brain imaging reports, and source images. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischaemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, unclassifiable stroke, or systemic embolism incidence at 90 days in a modified intention-to-treat population. We used a gatekeeper approach by sequentially testing for a non-inferiority margin of 2 percentage points, followed by testing for superiority. OPTIMAS is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN17896007) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03759938), and the trial is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between July 5, 2019, and Jan 31, 2024, 3648 patients were randomly assigned to early or delayed DOAC initiation. 27 participants did not fulfil the eligibility criteria or withdrew consent to include their data, leaving 3621 patients (1814 in the early group and 1807 in the delayed group; 1981 men and 1640 women) in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome occurred in 59 (3·3%) of 1814 participants in the early DOAC initiation group compared with 59 (3·3%) of 1807 participants in the delayed DOAC initiation group (adjusted risk difference [RD] 0·000, 95% CI -0·011 to 0·012). The upper limit of the 95% CI for the adjusted RD was less than the non-inferiority margin of 2 percentage points (p(non-inferiority)=0·0003). Superiority was not identified (p(superiority)=0·96). Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 11 (0·6%) participants allocated to the early DOAC initiation group compared with 12 (0·7%) participants allocated to the delayed DOAC initiation group (adjusted RD 0·001, -0·004 to 0·006; p=0·78). INTERPRETATION: Early DOAC initiation within 4 days after ischaemic stroke associated with atrial fibrillation was non-inferior to delayed initiation for the composite outcome of ischaemic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, unclassifiable stroke, or systemic embolism at 90 days. Our findings do not support the current common and guideline-supported practice of delaying DOAC initiation after ischaemic stroke with atrial fibrillation. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation.RDUH staff can access the full-text of this article by clicking on the 'Additional Link' above and logging in with NHS OpenAthens if prompted

Anticoagulation Timing in Acute Stroke With Atrial Fibrillation According to Chronic Kidney Disease: The OPTIMAS Trial

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of ischemic stroke (IS) and intracerebral hemorrhage, so the safety and efficacy of early direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) initiation in those with CKD are of interest. METHODS: OPTIMAS was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label trial with blinded outcome assessment, recruiting patients with IS and atrial fibrillation from 100 UK hospitals between 2019 and 2024. Participants were randomized 1:1, stratified by stroke severity, to early (within 4 days of onset) or delayed (at days 7-14) DOAC initiation. CKD was defined as a past medical history of known CKD, collected according to trial protocol as part of the case report form. For this prespecified subgroup analysis, the trial cohorts were classified according to the presence or absence of CKD. Whether CKD modified the treatment effect of early DOAC initiation was determined by fitting mixed effects logistic regression models with interaction terms between CKD and treatment group. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of recurrent IS, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and systemic arterial embolism. Key secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: We included 3601 patients (mean age, 78±10 years; 45% female), 543 with CKD. There were 116 primary outcome events: 97 (3.2%) in the normal kidney function group and 19 (3.5%) in the CKD group. There was no difference between early and delayed DOAC initiation for the primary outcome in either the normal kidney function group (odds ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.67-1.51]) or the CKD group (odds ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.36-2.25]; P(interaction)=0.822). Similarly, for the secondary outcomes, we detected no modification of the treatment effect according to CKD (P(interaction) values of 0.637, 0.386, and 0.107 for IS, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that CKD does not modify the effects of early versus delayed DOAC initiation after acute IS. Based on these results, early DOAC initiation should not be withheld in patients with CKD. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03759938.CC BY 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution