2,797 research outputs found
Mifepristone reduces insulin resistance in patient volunteers with adrenal incidentalomas that secrete low levels of cortisol : a pilot study
Background: Incidental adrenal masses are commonly detected during imaging for other pathologies. 10% of the elderly
population has an ‘adrenal incidentaloma’, up to 20% of these show low-grade autonomous cortisol secretion and 60% of
patients with autonomous cortisol secretion have insulin resistance. Cortisol excess is known to cause insulin resistance, an
independent cardiovascular risk marker, however in patients with adrenal incidentalomas it is unknown whether their
insulin resistance is secondary to the excess cortisol and therefore potentially reversible. In a proof of concept study we
examined the short-term effects of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonism in patients with an adrenal incidentaloma to
determine whether their insulin resistance was reversible.
Methodology/Principal Findings: In a prospective open-label pilot study, six individuals with adrenal incidentalomas and
autonomous cortisol secretion were treated with mifepristone (a GR antagonist) 200 mg twice daily and studied for 4 weeks
on a Clinical Research Facility. Insulin resistance at four weeks was assessed by insulin resistance indices, lnHOMA-IR and
lnMatsuda, and AUC insulin during a 2-hour glucose tolerance test. Biochemical evidence of GR blockade was shown in all
individuals and across the group there was a significant reduction in insulin resistance: lnHOMA-IR (1.0vs0.6; p = 0.03),
lnHOMA-%beta (4.8vs4.3; p = 0.03) and lnMatsuda (1.2vs1.6; p = 0.03). Five out of six individuals showed a reduction in
insulin AUC .7237 pmol/l.min, and in two patients this showed a clinically significant cardiovascular benefit (as defined by
the Helsinki heart study).
Conclusions: Short-term GR antagonism is sufficient to reduce insulin resistance in some individuals with adrenal
incidentalomas and mild cortisol excess. Further assessment is required to assess if the responses may be used to stratify
therapy as adrenal incidentalomas may be a common remediable cause of increased cardiovascular risk
Effect of age and gender on serum periostin: Relationship to cortical measures, bone turnover and hormones
Periostin is an extracellular matrix protein, and in bone is expressed most highly in the periosteum. It increases bone formation through osteoblast differentiation, cell adhesion, Wnt signalling and collagen cross-linking.
We hypothesised that serum periostin would be high at times of life when cortical modeling is active, in early adulthood and in older age, and that it would correlate with cortical bone measures, bone turnover and hormones that regulate cortical modeling.
We conducted a cross-sectional observational study of 166 healthy men and women at three skeletal stages; the end of longitudinal growth (16–18 years), peak bone mass (30–32 years) and older age (over 70 years). We measured serum periostin with a new ELISA optimised for human serum and plasma which recognises all known splice variants (Biomedica). We measured the distal radius and distal tibia with HR-pQCT, and measured serum PINP, CTX, sclerostin, PTH, IGF-1, estradiol and testosterone.
Periostin was higher at age 16–18 than age 30–32 (1253 vs 842 pmol/l, p < 0.001), but not different between age 30–32 and over age 70. Periostin was inversely correlated with tibia cortical thickness and density (R − 0.229, − 0.233, both p = 0.003). It was positively correlated with PINP (R 0.529, p < 0.001), CTX (R 0.427, p < 0.001) and IGF-1 (R 0.440, p < 0.001). When assessed within each age group these correlations were only significant at age 16–18, except for PINP which was also significant over age 70.
We conclude that periostin may have a role in IGF-1 driven cortical modeling and consolidation in young adults, but it may not be an important mediator in older adults
Thyroid Function within the Upper Normal Range Is Associated with Reduced Bone Mineral Density and an Increased Risk of Nonvertebral Fractures in Healthy Euthyroid Postmenopausal Women
Diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers and imaging for bone turnover in renal osteodystrophy
Background Renal osteodystrophy is common in advanced CKD, but characterization of bone turnover status can only be achieved by histomorphometric analysis of bone biopsy specimens (gold standard test). We tested whether bone biomarkers and high-resolution peripheral computed tomography (HR-pQCT) parameters can predict bone turnover status determined by histomorphometry.MethodsWe obtained fasting blood samples from 69 patients with CKD stages 4-5, including patients on dialysis, and 68 controls for biomarker analysis (intact parathyroid hormone [iPTH], procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide [PINP], bone alkaline phosphatase [bALP], collagen type 1 crosslinked C-telopeptide [CTX], and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b [TRAP5b]) and scanned the distal radius and tibia of participants by HR-pQCT. We used histomorphometry to evaluate bone biopsy specimens from 43 patients with CKD.ResultsLevels of all biomarkers tested were significantly higher in CKD samples than control samples. For discriminating low bone turnover, bALP, intact PINP, and TRAP5b had an areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.82, 0.79, and 0.80, respectively, each significantly better than the iPTH AUC of 0.61. Furthermore, radius HR-pQCT total volumetric bone mineral density and cortical bone volume had AUCs of 0.81 and 0.80, respectively. For discriminating high bone turnover, iPTH had an AUC of 0.76, similar to that of all other biomarkers tested.ConclusionsThe biomarkers bALP, intact PINP, and TRAP5b and radius HR-pQCT parameters can discriminate low from nonlow bone turnover. Despite poor diagnostic accuracy for low bone turnover, iPTH can discriminate high bone turnover with accuracy similar to that of the other biomarkers, including CTX
Metabolic effects of pamidronate in patients with metastatic bone disease
We have evaluated the value of specific bone resorption markers in monitoring metastatic bone disease to define the duration of action of a single high-dose pamidronate infusion. Twenty patients received a single infusion of pamidronate 120 mg for painful bone metastases. Ten out of these 20 patients also received a second infusion. They were evaluated at baseline, 2, 4 and 8 weeks after each infusion. A composite pain questionnaire, serum and urine tests were carried out at these time points. Bone resorption markers measured included urinary calcium, hydroxyproline and two new markers: pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline. Reference values were defined by 20 healthy controls matched by age and sex. Pamidronate induced a profound fall in bone resorption with a maximal effect within the first month after therapy. Changes in urinary calcium levels were confounded by a rise of 100% in the parathyroid hormone levels. Before treatment, pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline were increased in 70% of patients, while urinary calcium was increased in only 40% of them. Thirteen patients had a > or = 50% fall in deoxypyridinoline levels and were considered as biochemical responders. These patients had a mean reduction in pain score of about 30% of baseline levels, which was significantly higher than the seven non-biochemical responders. In conclusion, urinary calcium is not a precise marker of bone resorption. Deoxypyridinoline seems to be the most specific bone resorption marker in cancer patients. Biochemical responders have the most benefit from pamidronate in terms of pain relief. This suggests that patients may benefit from more potent or repeated infusions of bisphosphonates
Relationship of changes in total hip bone mineral density to vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with once-yearly zoledronic acid 5 mg: The HORIZON-Pivotal Fracture Trial (PFT)
Measurements of change in bone mineral density (BMD) are thought to be weak predictors of treatment effect on the reduction of fracture risk. In this study we report an alternative year-on-year approach for the estimation of treatment effect explained by BMD in which we examine the relationship between fracture risk and the most recent change in BMD. We studied 7736 postmenopausal women (ages 65 to 89 years) who were participants in the Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly–Pivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON-PFT) and were randomized to either intravenous administration of zoledronic acid or placebo. The percentage of treatment effect explained by change in total hip BMD was estimated using the alternative year-on-year approach and the standard approach of looking at change over 3 years. We also studied a subset of 1132 women in whom procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (PINP) was measured at baseline and 12 months, to estimate the percentage of treatment effect explained by change in PINP. Regardless of the method used, the change in total hip BMD explained a large percentage of the effect of zoledronic acid in reducing new vertebral fracture risk (40%; 95% CI, 30% to 54%; for the 3-year analysis). The treatment effects for nonvertebral fracture were not statistically significant for the year-on-year analysis but 3-year change in BMD explained 61% (95% CI, 24% to 156%) of treatment effect. Change in PINP explained 58% (95% CI, 15% to 222%) of the effect of zoledronic acid in reducing new vertebral fracture risk. We conclude that our estimates of the percentage of treatment effect explained may be higher than in previous studies because of high compliance with zoledronic acid (due to its once-yearly intravenous administration). Previous studies may have underestimated the relationship between BMD change and the effect of treatment on fracture risk. © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
Risk of hip, subtrochanteric, and femoral shaft fractures among mid and long term users of alendronate: nationwide cohort and nested case-control study
Objectives To determine the skeletal safety and efficacy of long term (≥10 years) alendronate use in patients with osteoporosis.
Design Open register based cohort study containing two nested case control studies.
Setting Nationwide study of population of Denmark.
Participants 61 990 men and women aged 50-94 at the start of treatment, who had not previously taken alendronate, 1996-2007.
Interventions Treatment with alendronate.
Main outcome measures Incident fracture of the subtrochanteric femur or femoral shaft (ST/FS) or the hip. Non-fracture controls from the cohort were matched to fracture cases by sex, year of birth, and year of initiation of alendronate treatment. Conditional logistic regression models were fitted to calculate odds ratios with and without adjustment for comorbidity and comedications. Sensitivity analyses investigated subsequent treatment with other drugs for osteoporosis.
Results 1428 participants sustained a ST/FS (incidence rate 3.4/1000 person years, 95% confidence interval 3.2 to 3.6), and 6784 sustained a hip fracture (16.2/1000 person years, 15.8 to 16.6). The risk of ST/FS was lower with high adherence to treatment with alendronate (medication possession ratio (MPR, a proxy for compliance) >80%) compared with poor adherence (MPR 80% was associated with a decreased risk of hip fracture (0.73, 0.68 to 0.78; P<0.001) as was longer term cumulative use for 5-10 dose years (0.74, 0.67 to 0.83; P<0.001) or ≥10 dose years (0.74, 0.56 to 0.97; P=0.03).
Conclusions These findings support an acceptable balance between benefit and risk with treatment with alendronate in terms of fracture outcomes, even for over 10 years of continuous use
Establishing reference intervals for bone turnover markers in healthy postmenopausal women in a nonfasting state.
In order to interpret bone turnover markers (BTMs), we need to establish healthy reference intervals. It is difficult to establish reference intervals for older women because they commonly suffer from diseases or take medications that affect bone turnover. The aims of this study were: (1) to identify diseases and drugs that have a substantial effect on BTMs; (2) to establish reference intervals for premenopausal and postmenopausal women; and (3) to examine the effects of other factors on BTMs in healthy postmenopausal women. We studied women aged 30-39 years (n=258) and women aged 55-79 years (n=2419) from a five-European centre population-based study. We obtained a nonfasting serum and second morning void urine samples at a single baseline visit. BTMs were measured using automated immunoassay analysers. BTMs were higher in patients with vitamin D deficiency and chronic kidney disease. Three or more BTMs were higher in women who were osteoporotic and at least two BTMs were lower in women who were oestrogen replete, taking osteoporosis treatments or having diseases known to affect bone turnover. These were used as exclusion criteria for selecting the populations for the reference intervals. The reference intervals for BTMs were higher in postmenopausal than premenopausal women. Levels of BTMs were not dependent on geographical location and increased with age
- …
