Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes

The increased popularity of tablets in general has led to uptake in education. We critically review the literature reporting use of tablets by primary and secondary school children across the curriculum, with a particular emphasis on learning outcomes. The Systematic Review methodology was used and our literature search resulted in 33 relevant studies meeting the inclusion criteria. A total of 23 met the minimum quality criteria and were examined in detail (16 reporting positive learning outcomes, 5 no difference and 2 negative learning outcomes). Explanations underlying these observations were analysed, and factors contributing to successful uses of tablets are discussed. While we hypothesise how tablets can viably support children in completing a variety of learning tasks (across a range of contexts and academic subjects), the fragmented nature of the current knowledge base, and the scarcity of rigorous studies, make it difficult to draw firm conclusions. The generalisability of evidence is limited and detailed explanations as to how, or why, using tablets within certain activities can improve learning remain elusive. We recommend that future research moves beyond exploration towards systematic and in-depth investigations building on the existing findings documented here.We gratefully acknowledge a donation from ARM Holdings Ltd. that partially supported this literature review.This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.1212

New geographies of Australian sovereignty

No abstract availabl

The Use of Direct Tension Monitoring of Mooring Lines in Reducing Conservatisms in Design and Analysis Models

The offshore oil and gas industry is continuing to push intodeeper water and onerous environments, using increasingly complicated vessels and equipment. This, combined with changing global weather patterns has increased uncertainty in offshore production operations. Monitoring mooring lines can help reduce this uncertainty by calculating fatigue damage estimates during major storm events. This greater understanding helps to optimise inspection and maintenance schedules and assess the likelihood of future mooring line failures. Added to this, if the deterioration or failure of a single mooring line is not detected, increasing loads on the remaining lines may result in additional failures. This is regarded as a system failure and could lead to significant consequences for both well control and riser integrity, resulting in huge costs for operators. Unless the operator inspects on a regular basis or monitors the mooring system in real time it is impossible to know for certain whether all mooring lines are in place. A popular technique for monitoring mooring systems is tomeasure mooring line angle (using accelerometer based inclinometers), to infer theoretical mooring line tension. Whilst these systems are effective at alerting operators to a line failure, the fact that tension must be inferred requires a certain amount of conservatism in the estimate. This conservatism can be difficult to quantify. This paper documents the sea trial of a well proven mooring connector combined with new mooring line technology capable of measuring both mooring line angle and direct line tension. This allows for a unique comparison between the two measurements. This paper will detail the results of this comparison, showing the accuracy of inclination based monitoring systems and the level of conservatism factored in when tension is inferred. The data published in this comparison can be used to reduce levels of uncertainty in offshore operations and thus reduce future levels of conservatism in design and analysis models. This can help save costs and increase efficiency for future operations, whilst also helping support safetystrategies.</jats:p