Proceedings from Scand-LAS Animal scientific symposium, Bergen, Norway, June 1994

No abstract availabl

The structure of a dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A-PKC412 complex reveals disulfide-bridge formation with the anomalous catalytic loop HRD(HCD) cysteine

The following article, Alexeeva, M., Åberg, E., Engh, R.A. & Rothweiler, U. (2015). The structure of a dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A-PKC412 complex reveals disulfide-bridge formation with the anomalous catalytic loop HRD(HCD) cysteine. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, 71, 1207-1215, can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1107/S1399004715005106.Dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) is a protein kinase associated with neuronal development and brain physiology. The DYRK kinases are very unusual with respect to the sequence of the catalytic loop, in which the otherwise highly conserved arginine of the HRD motif is replaced by a cysteine. This replacement, along with the proximity of a potential disulfide-bridge partner from the activation segment, implies a potential for redox control of DYRK family activities. Here, the crystal structure of DYRK1A bound to PKC412 is reported, showing the formation of the disulfide bridge and associated conformational changes of the activation loop. The DYRK kinases represent emerging drug targets for several neurological diseases as well as cancer. The observation of distinct activation states may impact strategies for drug targeting. In addition, the characterization of PKC412 binding offers new insights for DYRK inhibitor discovery

Recommendations for health monitoring of pig, cat, dog and gerbil breeding colonies: Report of the Scandinavian Federation for Laboratory Animal Science (Scand-LAS) Working Group of Animal Health

No abstract availabl

Data from FMS-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3–Internal Tandem Duplication Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Display a Nonoverlapping Profile of Resistance Mutations <i>In vitro</i>

&lt;div&gt;Abstract&lt;p&gt;FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors have shown activity in the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Secondary mutations in target kinases can cause clinical resistance to therapeutic kinase inhibition. We have previously shown that sensitivity toward tyrosine kinase inhibitors varies between different activating FLT3 mutations. We therefore intended to determine whether different FLT3 inhibitors would produce distinct profiles of secondary, FLT3 resistance mutations. Using a cell-based screening approach, we generated FLT3–internal tandem duplication (ITD)–expressing cell lines resistant to the FLT3 inhibitors SU5614, PKC412, and sorafenib. Interestingly, the profile of resistance mutations emerging with SU5614 was limited to exchanges in the second part of the kinase domain (TK2) with exchanges of D835 predominating. In contrast, PKC412 exclusively produced mutations within tyrosine kinase domain 1 (TK1) at position N676. A mutation at N676 recently has been reported in a case of PKC412-resistant AML. TK1 mutations exhibited a differential response to SU5614, sorafenib, and sunitinib but strongly impaired response to PKC412. TK2 exchanges identified with SU5614 were sensitive to PKC412, sunitinib, or sorafenib, with the exception of Y842D, which caused a strong resistance to sorafenib. Of note, sorafenib also produced a highly distinct profile of resistance mutations with no overlap to SU5614 or PKC412, including F691L in TK1 and exchanges at position Y842 of TK2. Thus, different FLT3 kinase inhibitors generate distinct, nonoverlapping resistance profiles. This is in contrast to Bcr-Abl kinase inhibitors such as imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib, which display overlapping resistance profiles. Therefore, combinations of FLT3 inhibitors may be useful to prevent FLT3 resistance mutations in the setting of FLT3-ITD–positive AML. [Cancer Res 2009;69(7):3032–41]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</jats:p

Sorafenib and Nilotinib Are Candidates to Overcome Imatinib Resistance in Myeloproliferation with FIP1L1-PDGFRA.

Abstract Abstract 2912 Poster Board II-888 Constitutively activated variants of PDGFRA, PDGFRB can be found in a subset of patients with myeloid neoplasms associated with eosinophilia. The most common is FIP1L1-PDGFRA (FP). Patients with PDGFR-A and -B rearranged myeloproliferation respond to treatment with imatinib. However, single cases of clinical resistance due to a secondary FP/T674I mutation have been reported. In CML, more than 40 different exchanges have been described that confer imatinib resistance, and sequential treatment with imatinib and novel Abl kinase inhibitors has become reality. Nilotinib and sorafinib are potent alternative inhibitors of PDGFR-A and -B. We therefore hypothesized that available PDGFR kinase inhibitors might produce specific profiles of secondary FP kinase domain mutations mediating inhibitor resistance. To this aim, we selected clones of FP expressing Ba/F3 cells resistant to rising concentrations of imatinib, nilotinib, and sorafinib. In these, we identified 27 different PDGFRA kinase domain mutations. Imatinib, nilotinib and sorafenib produced distinct profiles of resistance mutations. During selection with imatinib, FP/T674I predominated with rising concentrations. FP/T674I corresponds to Bcr-Abl/T315I, which is frequently found in imatinib resistant CML. In contrast to imatinib, nilotinib and sorafenib produced a significantly lower frequency of resistant cell clones. Also, T674I disappeared at therapeutic nilotinib concentrations in favour of T674I+T874I and D842V. Sorafinib displayed a distinct profile of mutations including D842V, but not T674I. Following cloning and expression of all FP variants, dose-response analysis indicated that full cross-resistance to all three inhibitors was limited to D842V, whereas the gatekeeper T674I exchange retained sensitivity to sorafenib and nilotinib, and T674I+T874I was responsive to sorafenib only. In silico structure modelling indicated that differences in inhibitor response observed in distinct clusters of FP mutations identified in drug-resistant clones are based on differences of sorafenib versus imatinib and nilotinib in key drug - protein target interactions in PDGFR family kinases. Besides direct inhibitor binding effects, we propose that the identified exchanges shift an inactive-active conformation equilibrium and thereby affect binding of type II inhibitors like imatinib, nilotinib and sorafenib. Our results predict PDGFR variants that might come up in patients with myeloproliferation positive for PDGFR-A or -B fusions treated with imatinib, nilotinib or sorafenib. These findings will help in selection of an appropriate second line PDGFR kinase inhibitor when resistance to imatinib emerges, and will guide drug design. Moreover, our data can be translated to other neoplasms driven by activated forms of PDGFR-A or -B including GIST, CMML, and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Use of sorafenib and nilotinib in myeloproliferation with prominent eosinophilia. </jats:sec